DRAFT OFFER DOCUMENT
(Dated [·])(will become Offer Document on the date of filing with the RoC)
AZTEC SOFTWARE AND TECHNOLOGY SERVICES LIMITED
(Incorporated as Aztec Software and Technology Services Pvt. Ltd. at Bangalore on October 4, 1995 and subsequently renamed Aztec Software and Technology Services Limited on June 12, 2000)
Registered Office: #23, 3rd A Cross, 18th Main, Koramangala Block 6,
Bangalore 560 095 India
Tel. No.: (+91-80) 5532036, 5522892, 5522893
Fax. No.: (+91-80) 5521987
Email: ipo@aztecsoft.com
Website: www.aztec.soft.net
(Formerly situated at 121/4, 8th Block, 8th Cross, 20'C' Main, K.R. Gardens, Koramangala, Bangalore 560 095 and prior to that at 1-A, Elgin Court, 3 Eagle Street, Richmond Town, Bangalore 560 025 and prior to that at 121, Victorian Avenue, 6 'D' Main, 13th Cross, Indiranagar II Stage, Bangalore 560 038)
Public Issue of [· ] Equity Shares ("Issue") of Rs. 3/- each issued for cash at a premium of Rs. [· ] per share aggregating at least Rs. 520 million. The Issue consists of Book Built Portion of [· ] Equity shares (90% of the Issue size) and a Fixed Price Portion of [· ] Equity Shares (10% of the Issue Size).
In case the price determined pursuant to Book Building results in a less than 10% dilution of the post Issue capital of the Company, then the Company would issue 3,800,000 Equity Shares at the Issue Price to ensure at least 10% post Issue dilution and in such case the Issue size would increase accordingly and will be updated in the Offer Document to be filed with the RoC.
This issue is being made through 90% Book Building Route wherein at least 15% of the Issue shall be allocated on a proportionate basis each to Non-Institutional Investors and Retail Bidders, subject to valid Bids being received at or above the Issue Price, and the balance Book Built Portion shall be allocated to Institutional Investors on a discretionary basis. The Fixed Price Portion for the remaining 10% of the Issue size shall be allocated on a proportionate basis.
RISK IN RELATION TO FIRST OFFER
This being the first Offer of the Equity Shares of Aztec Software and Technology Services Limited, there has been no formal market for the shares of the Company. The Issue Price (as has been determined by the Company in consultation with Book Running Lead Manager, on the basis of assessment of market demand for the offered securities by way of Book Building) should not be taken to be indicative of the market price of the Equity Shares after the Equity Shares are listed. No assurance can be given regarding an active and/or sustained trading in the Equity Shares of the Company nor regarding the price at which the Equity Shares will be traded after listing.
GENERAL RISK
Investment in Equity and Equity related securities involve a degree of risk and investors should not invest any funds in this Issue unless they can afford to take the risk of losing their investment. Investors are advised to read the risk factors carefully before taking an investment decision in this offering. For taking an investment decision, investors must rely on their own examination of the Issuer and the Issue including the risk involved. The Equity Shares offered in the Issue have not been recommended or approved by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) nor does SEBI guarantee the accuracy or adequacy of this document. Specific attention of the investors is invited to the statement of Risk Factors on Page No. ____of the Draft Offer Document.
ISSUER’S ABSOLUTE RESPONSIBILITY
The Company, having made all reasonable inquiries, accepts responsibility for, and confirms that this Draft Offer Document contains all information with regard to the Issuer and the Issue, which is material in the context of the Issue, that the information contained in this Draft Offer Document is true and correct in all material respects and is not misleading in any material respect, that the opinions and intentions expressed herein are honestly held and that there are no other facts, the omission of which makes this document as a whole or any of such information or the expression of any such opinions or intentions misleading in any material respect.
LISTING ARRANGEMENT
The Equity Shares are proposed to be listed on Bangalore Stock Exchange Limited (Regional Stock Exchange), The Stock Exchange, Mumbai and the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. The Company has received in-principle approval for listing from these Stock Exchanges.
The Present growth rates and valuation of the companies in the IT/Software Industry may be very high and may not be sustained in the future.
BOOK RUNNING LEAD MANAGER
|
JM MORGAN STANLEY LTD |
141, Maker Chambers III, Nariman Point, Mumbai 400 021 Email: ankush.pitale@msdw.com mailto:gaurav.gupta@msdw.com |
|
|
|
REGISTRARS TO THE ISSUE
|
MCS Limited |
Unit: Aztec Public Issue |
|
Sri Padmavati Bhavan, Plot No 93, Road No 16, M.I.D.C. Andheri (East), Mumbai 400 093 Tel: (91 22) 820 5741/42, 820 1785 Fax: (91 22) 820 1783 Email: mcsmum@bom2.vsnl.net.in |
ISSUE PROGRAMME
BID OPENS ON |
|
BID CLOSES ON |
|
FIXED PRICE PORTION AND BOOK BUILT ISSUE OPENS ON |
|
FIXED PRICE PORTION AND BOOK BUILT ISSUE CLOSES ON |
|
Caution :
This Draft Offer Document would be updated and modified to incorporate the comments of Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) and Stock Exchanges. The Draft Offer Document will be suitably modified to incorporate changes recommended by regulatory bodies and updated before filing with the Registrar of Companies, Karnataka at Bangalore under Section 60 of the Companies Act, 1956. This Draft Offer Document does not constitute an offer or an invitation to any person to subscribe to the Equity Shares of Aztec Software and Technology Services Limited.("Aztec") and is being issued for the sole purpose of ascertaining the demand for the Equity Shares. The contents of this Draft Offer Document are intended to be used exclusively by the persons to whom it is distributed. This document is not and should not be construed as a Prospectus under Section 60 of the Companies Act, 1956.
END OF COVER PAGE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page No(s)
Definitions and Abbreviations
Risk Factors
Highlights
Part I
I General Information
II Capital Structure
III Terms of Present Issue
IV Particulars of the Issue
V Company and Management
VI Operational and Financial Information
VII Y2K Disclosure
VIII Stock Market Data for Equity of the Company
IX Basis of Issue Price
X Particulars regarding previous issues
XI Companies under the same management
XII Mechanism evolved for redressal of investor grievances
XIII Outstanding litigations, defaults and material developments
XIV Risk factors
Part II
A. General Information
B. Financial Information
C. Statutory and Other Information
Relevant provisions of the Articles of Association of
Aztec Software and Technology Services Limited
D. Material contracts and documents for inspection
Part III
Declaration
DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS
Application Form |
The form in terms of which the investors shall apply for the Equity Shares of the Company issued in the Fixed Price Portion |
Articles |
Articles of Association of Aztec Software and Technology Services Limited |
ASP |
Application Service Providers. |
Aztec or the Company or the Issuer
|
Aztec Software and Technology Services Limited, a public limited company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956. |
BA |
Beneficiary Account. |
BgSE |
The Bangalore Stock Exchange Limited, Bangalore |
Bid |
An indication to make an offer in the Book Built Portion by a prospective investor to subscribe to Equity Shares of the Company at a designated price at or above the Floor Price, during the Bidding Period and includes all revisions and modifications thereto. |
Bid Amount |
Highest value of the optional Bid indicated in the Bid Form and payable by the Bidder on submission of the Bid in the Book Built Portion. |
Bid Closing Date |
The date after which the Syndicate Members to the offer would not accept any bids; and such date shall be notified through a notice in an English national newspaper, Hindi national newspaper and Regional language newspaper (where the registered office of Aztec is situated) with wide circulation. |
Bid Form/Bid cum Application Form |
The form in terms of which the Bidder shall Bid for the Equity Shares of the Company in Book Built Portion and shall, upon allocation of the Equity Shares by the BRLM and the filing of the Prospectus with the RoC, be deemed to be the application for allotment of the Equity Shares. Such application shall be irrevocable for a period of 35 days from the Issue Opening Date. |
Bid Opening Date |
The date on which the Syndicate Members to the offer would start accepting Bids; such date shall be the date notified and communicated through a notice in an English national newspaper, Hindi national newspaper and Regional language newspaper (where the registered office of Aztec is situated) with wide circulation. |
Bidder |
Any prospective investor who makes a Bid in terms of this Draft Offer Document. |
Bidding Period |
The period between the Bid Opening Date and the Bid Closing Date inclusive of both days and during which period prospective investors can submit their Bids. |
Board |
Board of Directors of Aztec or a Committee thereof. |
Book Built Portion |
Issue of [· ] Equity Shares of Rs 3/- each for cash at a premium of Rs. [· ] each through the process of book building. The Book Built Portion shall be the Public Issue less the Fixed Price Portion. |
BRLM/ Book Runner |
Book Running Lead Manager, in this case being JM Morgan Stanley Ltd. |
BSE |
The Stock Exchange, Mumbai |
CAGR |
Compounded Annual Growth Rate |
CAN |
Confirmation of Allocation Note, means the note or advice or intimation of allocation of Shares sent to the Bidders who have been allocated Shares in the Book Built Portion. |
CDSL |
Central Depository Services Limited |
CEPS |
Cash Earning per Equity Share |
CTO |
Chief Technology Officer |
Deemed Date of Allotment |
Date of Allotment for the Book Built Portion, which shall be the deemed date of allotment for all shares issued pursuant to the Offer Document. The Allotment in this Issue shall for all purposes be deemed to have been made on such date. |
DP |
Depository Participant |
Draft Offer Document |
Means this document which is not a Prospectus under Section 60 of the Act |
EPS |
Earning Per Equity Share |
Escrow Account of the Company/ Escrow Account |
Account opened with the Escrow Collection Bank and in whose favour the Bidder will issue cheques in respect of the Bid and in which account the cheques/demand drafts will be deposited by the Syndicate Members |
Escrow Collection Bank(s) |
The banks at which the Escrow Account of the Company will be opened and which act as such, in terms of this Draft Offer Document and the Escrow Agreement |
FCD |
Fully Convertible Debentures |
FII(s) |
Foreign Institutional Investors registered with SEBI under applicable laws |
Fixed Price Portion |
Issue of [· ] Equity Shares of Rs. 3/- each for cash at a premium of Rs. [· ] per share. This premium would be determined through the Book building process. The Fixed Price Portion shall be that portion of the Public Issue as is equivalent to 10% of the Public Issue which is reserved for allotment to individual investors who have not participated in the Book Built Portion or to those individual investors who did not obtain any allocation in the Book Built Portion. |
Floor Price |
The Price advertised by the Company, below which Issue Price will not be finalized and below which no bids will be accepted. The Floor Price may be revised from time to time by giving adequate public notice. |
FY |
Financial Year |
GoI |
Government of India |
I.T. Act |
The Income-tax Act, 1961 |
IPR |
Intellectual Property Rights |
Issue Closing Date for Book Built Portion |
The date on which the Book Built Portion closes for subscription from the public. |
Issue Closing Date for Fixed Price Portion |
The date on which the Fixed Price Portion closes for subscription from the public |
Issue Opening Date |
The date on which the Book Built Portion opens for automatic subscription by Bidders who have received allocation and have paid at least the Issue Price for their allocation into the Escrow Account of the Company. This date shall also mean the date on which the Fixed Price Portion opens for subscription by the public. Such date shall be notified and communicated through an advertisement in an English national newspaper, Hindi national newspaper and a regional language paper with wide circulation. |
Issue Period |
The period between the Issue Opening Date and Issue Closing Date including both these dates. |
Issue/ Offer |
Public Issue of [· ] Equity Shares ("Issue") of Rs. 3/- each issued for cash at a premium of Rs. [· ] per share aggregating at least Rs. 520 million. The Issue consists of Book Built Portion of [· ] Equity shares (90%) and a Fixed Price Portion of [· ] Equity Shares (10%). |
Issue/ Offer Price |
Price determined by the Company in consultation with the BRLM on the Pricing Date after the Bidding period and which shall be set forth in the Offer Document to be filed with the RoC, at which price the Equity Shares of the Company shall be allotted. |
Institutional Investors |
Bidders who are Public Financial Institutions as specified in Section 4A of the Act, FIIs registered with SEBI, scheduled commercial banks, mutual funds registered with SEBI, multilateral and bilateral development financial institutions and venture capital funds registered with SEBI. |
Memorandum |
Memorandum of Association of Aztec |
NCD |
Non Convertible Debenture |
NRI(s) |
Non-Resident Indian (s) |
NSDL |
National Securities Depository Limited |
NSE |
National Stock Exchange of India Limited |
Non-Institutional Investors |
All Investors which are not Institutional Investors or Retail Bidders. |
OCB(s) |
Overseas Corporate Body(ies) as defined under Indian laws |
Pay-in-Period |
For the Book Built Portion, Pay-in-Period means the period commencing on the Bid Opening Date and extending till the Bid Closing Date, during which the Bidders have to pay the maximum Bid Amount into the Escrow Account of the Company, unless such requirement is waived by the Syndicate Members. In case of requirement of payment during the Bidding Period is waived by the Syndicate Members, the Pay-in Period means the period commencing on the Bid Opening Date and extending till the closure of the Pay-in Period, which shall be the date specified in the CAN and which shall be subject to a minimum period of two days from the communication of the allocation list of respective Syndicate Member to them by the BRLM. |
Pricing Date |
The date on which the Company in consultation with the BRLM(s) finalises the Issue Price |
Prospectus / Offer Document |
The Prospectus filed with the RoC containing inter alia the Issue Price that is determined at the end of the Book Building process, and the number of Equity Shares to be issued, and other incidental information. |
Public Issue Account |
Account opened with Bankers to the Issue for the purpose of transfer of monies from the Escrow Account of the Company on or after the Issue Opening Date. |
RBI |
The Reserve Bank of India |
Regional Stock Exchange |
Bangalore Stock Exchange Limited, Bangalore |
Registrars |
Registrars to the Issue, MCS Limited |
Retail Bidders |
Means the Bidders who are individuals (including HUFs and NRIs) and who have not Bid for more than 1000 Equity Shares in any of their options in the Book Built Portion. |
Revision Form |
The form used by the Bidders to modify the quantity of Equity Shares or the Bid Price in any of the Bid options as per their Bid Forms and as modified by their subsequent Revision Form(s), if any. |
RoC |
Registrar of Companies, Karnataka at Bangalore |
SEBI |
Securities and Exchange Board of India constituted under the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (as amended) |
SEBI Guidelines |
The Guidelines for Disclosure and Investor Protection issued by SEBI on January 19, 2000 read with clarifications issued subsequent to that date and Clarification XXVII issued prior to that date and also includes instructions issued by the Board from time to time. |
Syndicate |
The Book Running Lead Manager and Syndicate Member(s) |
Syndicate Member(s) |
Enam Financial Consultants Private Limited |
The Act |
The Companies Act, 1956 (as amended from time to time) |
TRS or Order confirmation note |
Transaction Registration Slip, means the slip or document registering the Bids, issued by the Syndicate Member to the Bidder as proof of registration of the Bid upon submission of the Bid Form in terms of this Draft Offer Document |
US or USA |
The United States of America |
In this Draft Offer Document, all reference to "Rs." refer to Rupees, the lawful currency of India, "USD" or "US$" refer to the United States Dollar, the lawful currency of the USA, reference to one gender also refers to another gender, wherever applicable and the word "Lakh" or "Lac" means "one hundred thousand" and the word "million" means "ten lakh" and the word "crore" means "ten million"
RISK FACTORS AND MANAGEMENT PERCEPTION THEREOF
The investors should consider the following risk factors carefully in evaluating the Company and its business before making any investment decision. Any projections, forecasts and estimates contained herein are forward looking statements and are based on certain assumptions that the Company considers reasonable. Projections are necessarily speculative in nature and it can be expected that some or all of the assumptions underlying the projections will not materialise or will vary significantly from actual results. Accordingly, the projections are only estimates. This Draft Offer Document contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Such statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "may", "will", "expect", "anticipate", "estimate", continue", "plan", "likely" or other similar words. The Company’s actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth in the following risk factors and elsewhere in this Draft Offer Document. None of the company, the BRLM, the Syndicate Members or their respective affiliates has any obligation to update or otherwise revise any projections, including revisions, if any, to reflect changes in economic conditions or other circumstances arising after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, even if the underlying assumptions do not come to fruition.
This Draft Offer Document also includes statistical data regarding software, ASP and Internet industries. This data was obtained from industry publications and reports that the Company believes to be reliable sources. The Company, BRLM or Syndicate Members have not independently verified such data.
In accordance with the extant SEBI Guidelines, in order to ensure a minimum of 10% dilution, the Company may raise an amount, which is higher than its immediate identified requirements. However the Company will disclose the plans for use of these proceeds before filing the Offer document with RoC.
Internal Factors
Management Perception: The Company believes that it has the professional expertise to estimate its capital expenditure plan. In-house qualified and experienced team of professionals has worked out the fund requirement. At this time the Company does not foresee any borrowing requirements under this plan and thus has not approached any bank or financial institution for appraisal.
Management Perception: Based on Company’s historical high rate of growth and its ability to manage such growth and attract qualified personnel in the past, the Company believes that it can manage its growth. The Company has recruited, and is in the process of recruiting senior people to effectively manage its growth. The Company is also implementing internal control and quality control processes to ensure the quality of its services. However, no assurance can be given that the Company will be successful in meeting new challenges arising out of the growth in its business.
Management Perception: Since inception only one of its key managerial personnel has resigned. The Company has in place an informal work atmosphere, an intense technology focus, competitive salaries, performance based reward system and a generous stock option plan. The Company believes that these measures should enable the Company to attract new talent as well as retain its existing talent base. In the year 1999-00, the employee attrition rate for the Company was 6.5%.
Management Perception: The Company has expertise in some fundamental areas of technology like Database internals, Warehousing and messaging. This expertise ensures that the Company can adapt to changes in the programming tools easily. The Technology Development team of the Company lead by its CTO is on proactive look-out for replacement technologies. Also, the fact that the Company works at the cutting edge of technology ensures that the Company is in constant touch with the very latest trends in evolving industry standards, making the process of adapting to changes in them easier.
Management Perception: The Company has made significant progress in signing on new clients and thus reducing the dependence on a few clients. In the quarter ended June 30, 2000, the Company signed 6 new clients.
Management Perception: The Company gets constant feedback from clients on the quality of the solutions delivered, thus preventing a situation wherein a contract is terminated prematurely. The Company has processes in place to ensure proper effort estimation and prevent cost overruns in case of fixed price contracts. Due to effective quality control measures, so far the Company has neither faced any premature unilateral termination of its projects nor any material cost overruns.
Management Perception: The Company relies on a combination of non-disclosure and other contractual agreements and copyright, trademark and trade secret laws to protect its proprietary rights in software and other IP tools. The Company also requires its professionals and contractual workers to enter into non-disclosure and assignment of rights arrangements to limit access to and distribution of proprietary information. Although IPRs are essential for competitive advantage, the Company gets only a small percentage of its revenues (about 5%) from direct sales/license of its IP components. The Company will try and get patents to protect its IPRs, wherever possible, but no assurance can be given that that the steps taken by the Company in this regard will be adequate to deter misappropriation of proprietary information or that the Company will be able to detect unauthorized use.
Management Perception: The Company is evaluating various alternatives for potential acquisition targets or alliance partners. The Company recognizes the challenge involved in carrying out and completing a successful acquisition and thus would analyze the strategic fit of the potential target. The Company will employ experience and talent (both from within the Company and independent experts) to ensure that the acquisitions or alliances are completed successfully.
Management Perception: The Company would seek to ensure that the requirements of funds are met in line with the acquisition needs. As the Company currently has a low debt, it can potentially leverage itself to meet any additional funds requirement.
Management Perception: The debt mentioned above is a part of the normal business activities of the Company. Out of this Rs. 13.3 million have already been recovered by July 21, 2000.
Management Perception: The Company is in the process of identifying suitable locations for the proposed development center and Phase II of expansion. The Company will apply for the necessary regulatory approvals once the possession of the premises is taken. Since the Company is yet to identify the new premises, it is not in a position to list out all the regulatory approvals that would be required for the new premises. The markets for the equipments for which the orders are not placed are very competitive, with many suppliers. Majority of equipment is indigenously available. So the Company does not foresee any difficulty in procuring the equipments as and when the need arises.
Management Perception: The Company has entered into an Master Services Agreement with Aztec Software, Inc by which the Company pays commission to Aztec Software, Inc for the services rendered by it on behalf of the Company. This steady stream of revenue is expected to improve the financial condition of Aztec Software, Inc. Losses of e4e Holdings Ventures are not likely to affect Aztec.
Date
|
Name of Shareholder
|
No. of Shares |
Face value
|
Issue Price Rs. |
18/10/99 |
e4e Holdings Limited |
2,364,367 |
3.0 |
9.2 |
03/05/00 |
Chandrasekar.S |
14,490 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
03/05/00 |
Shankar Mahalingam |
3,710 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
03/05/00 |
Krishnaprasad |
7,263 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
03/05/00 |
Bharat Sethuraman |
10,893 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
23/05/00 |
Aztec Software & Technology Services Limited Employees' Welfare Trust |
4,493,334 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
23/05/00 |
Venkat Subramania Raju |
8,000 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
07/09/00 |
Aztec Software & Technology Services Limited Employees' Welfare Trust |
1,500,000 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
External Factors
Management Perception: The Company’s capabilities in technology and project delivery and the fact that the Company has built up IP library over the years will protect its revenues and margins even in face of new entrants into the market. Please refer to page [· ] on Competition.
Management Perception: The GoI has identified Software as a major thrust area for Exports and incentives are being provided to encourage this industry. The Company believes that it is unlikely that the GoI would initiate any policy, which could be detrimental to the growth of this sector in near future.
Management Perception: The Company works at the cutting edge of technology and is constantly exposed to the developments in technology. The Company works as a co-development partner with some product companies like Microsoft, Viador and Embarcadero. This ensures that the Company is exposed to futuristic technology, thereby mitigating to certain extent, the threat of obsolescence. The Company also seeks to improve the skill set of its employees through training and upgrades its infrastructure to keep pace with the technological needs. The Company is setting-up Aztec Learning Center for the purpose of training.
Management perception: Exchange rate fluctuation is an attendant business risk for all software exporters. Historically the dollar has been stronger than rupee.
Notes
Name of the Party |
Nature of relationship |
Subject matter of contract |
Expenditure /Income |
Amount (Rs. in millions) |
Jam Cracker Inc (formerly known as Vital Tone inc) |
A company in which Mr K B Chandrasekhar, Director is interested |
Software Development Services |
Income |
47.67 |
Reez.Com |
A company in which Mr K B Chandrasekhar, Director is interested |
Software Development Services |
Income |
8.21 |
Aztec Software Inc |
Wholly Owned Subsidiary |
Consultancy Charges – On site |
Expenditure |
20.62 |
Aztec Software Inc |
Wholly Owned Subsidiary |
Agency Commission |
Expenditure |
16.86 |
Aztec Software Inc |
Wholly Owned Subsidiary |
Accommodation /travel related expenses payable |
Expenditure |
4.88 |
Aztec Software and Technology Services Private Limited Employees Welfare Trust. |
A Trust formed for the administration and implementation of the Company’s 1998 Stock Options Plan (India) |
Interest Free Loan |
- |
13.39 |
Name of the Party |
Nature of relationship |
Subject matter of contract |
Expenditure /Income |
Amount (Rs. in millions) |
M. Chandrasekaran |
Director |
Professional fees |
Expenditure |
0.25 |
Aztec Software Inc |
Wholly Owned Subsidiary |
Professional charges and travel related expenses |
Expenditure |
9.31 |
Jam Cracker Inc (formerly known as Vital Tone inc) |
A company in which Mr K B Chandrasekhar, Director is interested |
Software Development Services |
Income |
45.60 |
HIGHLIGHTS
AZTEC SOFTWARE AND TECHNOLOGY SERVICES LIMITED
(Incorporated as Aztec Software and Technology Services Pvt. Ltd. at Bangalore on October 4, 1995 and subsequently renamed Aztec Software and Technology Services Limited on June 12, 2000)
Registered Office: #23, 3rd A Cross, 18th Main, Koramangala Block 6,
Bangalore 560 095 India
Tel. No.: (+91-80) 5532036, 5522892, 5522893
Fax. No.: (+91-80) 5521987
Email: ipo@aztecsoft.com
Website: www.aztec.soft.net
(Formerly situated at 121/4, 8th Block, 8th Cross, 20'C' Main, K.R. Gardens, Koramangala, Bangalore 560 095 and prior to that at 1-A, Elgin Court, 3 Eagle Street, Richmond Town, Bangalore 560 025 and prior to that at 121, Victorian Avenue, 6 'D' Main, 13th Cross, Indiranagar II Stage, Bangalore 560 038)
Public Issue of [· ] Equity Shares ("Issue") of Rs. 3/- each issued for cash at a premium of Rs. [· ] per share aggregating at least Rs. 520 million. The Issue consists of Book Built Portion of [· ] Equity shares (90% of the Issue size) and a Fixed Price Portion of [· ] Equity Shares (10% of the Issue Size).
In case the price determined pursuant to Book Building results in a less than 10% dilution of the post Issue capital of the Company, then the Company would issue 3,800,000 Equity Shares at the Issue Price to ensure at least 10% post Issue dilution and in such case the Issue size would increase accordingly and will be updated in the Offer Document to be filed with the RoC
This issue is being made through 90% Book Building Route wherein at least 15% of the Issue shall be allocated on a proportionate basis each to Non-Institutional Investors and Retail Bidders, subject to valid Bids being received at or above the Issue Price, and the balance Book Built Portion shall be allocated to Institutional Investors on a discretionary basis. The Fixed Price Portion for the remaining 10% of the Issue size shall be allocated on a proportionate basis.
PART I
I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
Aztec is offering for subscription [· ] Equity Shares ("Issue") of Rs.3/- each for cash at a premium of Rs. [· ] per share aggregating Rs. 520 million.
AUTHORITY FOR THE PRESENT ISSUE
The Issue has been authorized by a Special Resolution passed, pursuant to Section 81(1A) of the Act, at the Extra Ordinary General Meeting of the members of the Company held on May 11, 2000 and a resolution passed by the Board of Directors at its meeting held on May 15, 2000.
The Company, its directors or any of the Company’s associates or group companies have not been prohibited from accessing the capital market under any order or direction passed by SEBI.
Government Approvals
No further approval is required from any Government authority for this Issue except the permission from Reserve Bank of India for FIIs to apply in this Issue.
The Company requires no further approvals from the Government for its existing activities.
The Company has received following Government approvals:
The Company will require registration with Assistant Commissioner of Customs as Bonded Warehouse for its proposed new premises. It will also require permission from Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited for the power supply and for use of Generators for the new premises. Since the Company is yet to identify the new premises, it is not in a position to list out all the regulatory approvals that would be required for the new premises.
DISCLAIMER CLAUSE:
As required, a copy of the Draft Offer Document has been submitted to SEBI. It is to be distinctly understood that submission of the Draft Offer Document to SEBI should not, in any way, be deemed or construed that the same has been cleared or approved by SEBI. SEBI does not take any responsibility either for the financial soundness of any scheme or the project for which the Issue is proposed to be made or for the correctness of the statements made or opinions expressed in the Draft Offer Document. The Book Running Lead Manager, JM Morgan Stanley Limited, has certified that the disclosures made in the Draft Offer Document are generally adequate and are in conformity with SEBI Guidelines for Disclosures and Investor Protection as for the time being in force. This requirement is to facilitate investors to take an informed decision for making investment in the proposed issue. It should also be clearly understood that while the Company is primarily responsible for the correctness, adequacy and disclosure of all relevant information in the Draft Offer Document, the Book Running Lead Manager is expected to exercise due diligence to ensure that the Company discharges its responsibility adequately in this behalf and towards this purpose, the Book Running Lead Manager, JM Morgan Stanley Limited, has furnished to SEBI, a due diligence certificate dated September 7, 2000 in accordance with the SEBI (Merchant Bankers) Regulations, 1992 which reads as follows:
"(1) We have examined various documents including those relating to litigation like commercial disputes, patent disputes, disputes with collaborators etc. and other materials in connection with the finalisation of the Draft Offer Document pertaining to the said Issue.
(2) On the basis of such examination and the discussions with the Company, its directors and other officers, other agencies, independent verification of the statements concerning the objects of the Issue, projected profitability, price justification and the contents of the documents mentioned in the annexure and other papers furnished by the Company.
WE CONFIRM that:
(a) The Draft Offer Document forwarded to SEBI is in conformity with the documents, materials and papers relevant to the Issue;
(b) All the legal requirements connected with the said Issue as also the guidelines, instructions, etc. issued by SEBI, the government and any other competent authority in this behalf have been duly complied with; and
(c) The disclosures made in the Draft Offer Document are true, fair and adequate to enable the investors to make a well informed decision as to the investment in the proposed issue.
(3) We confirm that besides ourselves, all the intermediaries named in the Draft Offer Document are registered with SEBI and that till date such registrations are valid.
(4) When underwritten, we shall satisfy ourselves about the worth of the underwriters to fulfil their underwriting commitments."
All legal requirements pertaining to the Issue will be complied with at the time of registration of the Offer Document with the RoC in terms of Section 56 of the Act.
The filing of Draft Offer Document does not, however, absolve the Company from any liabilities under Section 63 of the Act or from the requirement of obtaining such statutory and other clearances as may be required for the purpose of the proposed Issue. SEBI further reserves the right to take up at any point of time, with the Book Running Lead Manager, any irregularities or lapses in the Draft Offer Document.
CAUTION
The Company and the Book Running Lead Manager(s) accept no responsibility for statements made otherwise than in the Draft Offer Document or in the advertisements or any other material issued by or at the instance of the Company and that anyone placing reliance on any other source of information would be doing so at his/ her own risk.
The BRLM(s) accepts no responsibility, save to the limited extent as provided in terms of the Memorandum of Understanding entered into by the Company and itself and the Syndicate and Underwriting agreement entered into by the Company and BRLM and the Syndicate members. The BRLM/Syndicate members shall not be responsible to the bidders for any failure in downloading of the bids either due to faults in the hardware/software systems or otherwise.
DISCLAIMER IN RESPECT OF JURISDICTION
This Offer is being made in India to persons resident in India (including Indian nationals resident in India who are majors, Hindu Undivided Families, companies, corporate bodies and societies registered under the applicable laws in India and authorised to invest in shares, Indian mutual funds registered with SEBI, Indian financial institutions, commercial banks, regional rural banks, co-operative banks (subject to RBI permission), Trusts registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, or any other Trust law and who are authorised under their constitution to hold and invest in shares) and to NRIs, OCBs and FIIs as defined under the Indian laws. This Draft Offer Document does not, however, constitute an offer to sell or an invitation to subscribe to shares issued hereby in any other jurisdiction to any person to whom it is unlawful to make an offer or invitation in such jurisdiction. Any person into whose possession this Draft Offer Document comes is required to inform himself about and to observe any such restrictions. Any dispute arising out of this Issue will be subject to the jurisdiction of appropriate court(s) in India only.
No action has been or will be taken to permit a public offering in any jurisdiction where action would be required for that purpose, except that this Draft Offer Document has been submitted to the SEBI. Accordingly, the Equity Shares, represented thereby may not be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, and this Draft Offer Document may not be distributed, in any jurisdiction, except in accordance with the legal requirements applicable in such jurisdiction. Neither the delivery of this Draft Offer Document nor any sale hereunder shall, under any circumstances, create any implication that there has been no change in the affairs of Aztec since the date hereof or that the information contained herein is correct as of any time subsequent to this date.
DISCLAIMER CLAUSE OF THE STOCK EXCHANGE, MUMBAI
The Stock Exchange, Mumbai has vide its letter dated [·] given its permission to Aztec to use its name in this Offer Document as one of the stock exchanges on which Aztec securities are proposed to be listed. The BSE has scrutinised this Offer Document for their limited internal purpose of deciding on the matter of granting the aforesaid permission to Aztec. BSE does not in any manner: -
It should not, for any reason be deemed or construed that this Offer Document has been cleared or approved by the BSE. Every person who desires to apply for or otherwise acquires any securities of Aztec may do so pursuant to independent inquiry, investigation and analysis and shall not have any claim against the BSE whatsoever by reason of any loss which may be suffered by such person consequent to or in connection with such subscription/ acquisition whether by reason of anything stated or omitted to be stated herein or for any other reason whatsoever.
DISCLAIMER CLAUSE OF THE NATIONAL STOCK EXCHANGE OF INDIA LIMITED:
As required, a copy of this Offer Document has been submitted to National Stock Exchange of India Limited (hereinafter referred to as NSE). NSE has given vide its letter dated [·], permission to the Issuer to use the Exchange’s name in this Offer Document as one of the Stock Exchanges on which this Issuer’s securities are proposed to be listed. The Exchange has scrutinised this Offer Document for its limited purpose of deciding on the matter of granting the aforesaid permission to this Issuer. It is to be distinctly understood that the aforesaid permission given by NSE should not in any way be deemed or construed that the Offer Document has been cleared or approved by NSE; nor does it in any manner warrant, certify or endorse the correctness or completeness of any of the contents of this Offer Document; nor does it warrant that this Issuer’s securities will be listed or continue to be listed on the Exchange: nor does it take responsibility for the financial or other soundness of this Issuer, its promoters, its management or any scheme or project of this Issuer.
Every person who desires to apply for or otherwise acquire any securities of this issuer may do so pursuant to an independent inquiry, investigation and analysis and shall not have any claim against the Exchange whatsoever by reason of any loss which may be suffered by such person consequent to or in connection with such subscription/acquisition whether by reason of anything stated or omitted to be stated herein or any other reason whatsoever.
DISCLAIMER CLAUSE OF THE BANGALORE STOCK EXCHANGE LIMITED
The Bangalore Stock Exchange Limited, Bangalore has vide its letter dated [·] given its permission to Aztec to use its name in this Offer Document as one of the stock exchanges on which Aztec securities are proposed to be listed. The BgSE has scrutinized this Offer Document for their limited internal purpose of deciding on the matter of granting the aforesaid permission to Aztec. BgSE does not in any manner: -
It should not, for any reason be deemed or construed that this Offer Document has been cleared or approved by the BgSE. Every person who desires to apply for or otherwise acquires any securities of Aztec may do so pursuant to independent inquiry, investigation and analysis and shall not have any claim against the BgSE whatsoever by reason of any loss which may be suffered by such person consequent to or in connection with such subscription/ acquisition whether by reason of anything stated or omitted to be stated herein or for any other reason whatsoever.
FILING:
A copy of the Draft Offer Document having attached there to the documents required to be filed under Section 60 of the Act would be delivered for registration to the Registrar of Companies, Karnataka, at Bangalore. A copy of the Draft Offer Document would be filed with SEBI at Ground Floor, Mittal Court, "A" Wing, Nariman Point, Mumbai 400 021.
LISTING:
Applications have been made to The Bangalore Stock Exchange Limited (Regional Stock Exchange), The Stock Exchange, Mumbai and The National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. for permission to deal in and for an official quotation of the Equity Shares of the Company.
If the permissions to deal in and for an official quotation of the Equity Shares are not granted by any of the Stock Exchanges mentioned above, the Company shall forthwith repay, without interest, all moneys received from the applicants in pursuance of this Draft Offer Document. If such money is not repaid within eight days after the Company becomes liable to repay it (i.e. from the date of refusal or within 70 days from the date of closing of the subscription list, whichever is earlier), then the Company and every director of the Company who is an officer in default shall, on and from expiry of eight days, will be jointly and severally liable to repay the money, with interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum on application money, as prescribed under Section 73 of the Act.
The Company shall ensure that all steps for the completion of the necessary formalities for listing and commencement of trading at all the Stock Exchanges where the Equity Shares are proposed to be listed are taken within seven working days of finalization and adoption of the Basis of Allotment for the Fixed Price Portion.
IMPERSONATION
Attention of the applicants is specifically drawn to the provisions of sub-section (1) of Section 68 A of the Act, which is reproduced below:
"Any person who
(a) makes in a fictitious name, an application to a company for acquiring or subscribing for, any shares therein, or
(b) otherwise induces a company to allot, or register any transfer of shares therein to him, or any other person in a fictitious name,
shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years."
MINIMUM SUBSCRIPTION
The minimum subscription to be raised by this Issue is [· ] Equity Shares being 90% of the [· ] Equity Shares offered through this Draft Offer Document.
If the Company does not receive the minimum subscription of 90% of the net offer to public including devolvement of Syndicate Members, if any, within 60 days from the Issue Closing Date for Fixed Price Portion, the Company shall forthwith refund the entire subscription amount received. If there is a delay beyond eight days after the Company becomes liable to pay the amount, the Company shall pay interest prescribed under Section 73 of the Companies Act, 1956.
LETTERS OF ALLOTMENT / REFUND ORDERS
The Company shall dispatch Share Certificate(s)/Refund Order/cancelled Stockinvest and give demat credit to the Beneficiary Account with Depository Participants and submit the listing documents to the Stock Exchange within two working days of finalisation and adoption of the Basis of Allotment for Fixed Price Portion. The Company will dispatch Letter(s) of Allotment, Share Certificate(s), Letter(s) of Regret, cancelled Stockinvest and Refund Orders, if any, in excess of Rs. 1,500/-, as the case may be, by Registered Post/Speed Post at the sole/first applicant’s sole risk. Refund orders up to Rs.1,500/- will be sent under certificate of posting.
In accordance with the Act, the Stock Exchange requirements and SEBI Guidelines the Company further undertake that:
The Company will provide adequate funds to the Registrars to the Issue, for this purpose.
ISSUE PROGRAMME
Book Built Portion
Bidding Period
BID OPENING DATE |
|
BID CLOSING DATE |
|
Bids and any revision in bids shall be accepted only between 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. during the Bidding period as mentioned above at the bidding centres mentioned on the Bid cum Application Form except that on the Bid the Bid Closure Date, the Bids shall be accepted only between 10 a.m. and 12 noon.
The Book Building Issue shall remain open at the commencement of banking hours and shall close at the close of banking hours on the days as mentioned below :
BOOK BUILT PORTION OPENS ON |
|
BOOK BUILT PORTION CLOSES ON |
|
During this period the Escrow Collection Bank shall transfer the funds from the Escrow Account to the Public Issue Account with the Bankers to the Issue.
FIXED PRICE PORTION
The subscription list shall remain open at the commencement of banking hours and shall close at the close of banking hours on the days as mentioned below:
FIXED PRICE PORTION OPENS ON |
|
FIXED PRICE PORTION CLOSES ON |
BOOK RUNNING LEAD MANAGER
JM Morgan Stanley Limited
141, Maker Chambers III,
Nariman Point,
Mumbai 400 021.
Tel. No.: (022) 230 3030/ 283 1237
Fax. No.: (022) 204 2137/ 230 1694
Email:ankush.pitale@msdw.com
SYNDICATE MEMBERS
Enam Financial Consultants Private Limited
801/802 Dalamal Towers, Nariman Point,
Mumbai 400 021
Tel. No.: (022) 282 8554/57
Fax. No.: (022) 284 6824
Email: enam@giasbom01.vsnl.net.in
ADVISORS TO THE ISSUE
Bank of America
P.O. Box No 10080,
Express Towers, Nariman Point,
Mumbai 400 021
Tel. No.: (022) 285 2882
Fax. No.: (022) 285 5186
REGISTRARS TO THE ISSUE
MCS Limited
Sri Padmavati Bhavan, Plot No 93, Road No 16,
M.I.D.C. Andheri (East),
Mumbai 400 093
Tel. No.: (022) 820 5741/42
Fax. No.: (022) 820 1783
LEGAL ADVISOR TO THE issuer
Messers. N. Jayaraman
Advocates
#112/12, 11th Cross, Malleswaram,
Bangalore 560 003
Tel. No.: (080) 3363823
Fax. No.: (080) 3361196
Kanga & Co
Advocates, Solicitors and Notaries
Readymoney Mansion,
43 Veer Nariman Road,
Mumbai 400 001
Tel. No.: (022) 288 6541-52
Fax. No.: (022) 204 3726
LEGAL ADVISOR TO THE Book running lead managers
Amarchand & Mangaldas & Suresh A. Shroff & Co.
Solicitors & Advocates
Lentin Chambers
Dalal Street
Fort, Mumbai 400 023
Tel. No.: (022) 2650500
Fax No.: (022) 2633891
AUDITORS
BSR & Co.
Chartered Accountants
20/2 Vittal Mallya Road
Bangalore 560 001
Tel. No.: (080)
Fax. No.: (080)
ESCROW COLLECTION BANKS
Citibank, N.A.
Plot C-61, Bandra Kurla Complex, G-Block,
Bandra (East),
Mumbai 400 051
Deutsche Bank AG
Mumbai Branch, Kodak House,
222, Dr. DN Road, Post Box 1142, Fort,
Mumbai 400 001
BANKERS TO THE ISSUE
Bank of America
P.O. Box No 10080,
Express Towers, Nariman Point,
Mumbai 400 021
Bank of Punjab Limited
7, Surya Mahal,
118, Nagindas Master Road, Fort,
Mumbai 400 023
Citibank, N.A.
Plot C-61, Bandra Kurla Complex, G-Block,
Bandra (East),
Mumbai 400 051
Deutsche Bank AG
Mumbai Branch, Kodak House,
222, Dr. DN Road, Post Box 1142, Fort,
Mumbai 400 001
INVESTOR RELATIONS OFFICER
A.G. Muralikrishnan
Aztec Software and Technology Services Limited
#23, 3rd A Cross, 18th Main, Koramangala Block 6,
Bangalore 560 095
Tel. No.: (080) 5532036, 5522892, 5522893
Fax. No.: (080) 5521987
Email.: murali@aztecsoft.com
COMPANY SECRETARY AND COMPLIANCE OFFICER
A.S. Keshava Murthy
Aztec Software and Technology Services Limited
#23, 3rd A Cross, 18th Main, Koramangala Block 6,
Bangalore 560 095
Tel. No.: (080) 5532036, 5522892, 5522893
Fax. No.: (080) 5521987
Email.: keshavam@aztecsoft.com
Investors can contact the Compliance Officer in case of any pre-issue / post-issue related problems such as non-receipt of letters of allotment / share certificates / refund orders / cancelled stockinvests etc.
CREDIT RATING:
Since the present issue is of Equity Shares, credit rating is not required.
TRUSTEES
Since the present issue is of Equity Shares, appointment of Trustees is not required.
BOOK BUILDING PROCESS
Book building refers to the collective bids from investors, the Issue Price being fixed after the Bid Closing Date. The principal intermediaries involved in a book building process are:
SEBI vide its Guidelines for Disclosure and Investor Protection has permitted the Issuer proposing to offer securities to public to have an option to offer 90% of net public offer through book-building facility wherein at least 15% of the Issue shall be allocated on a proportionate basis each to Non-institutional investors and Retail Bidders, subject to valid bids being received at or above the Issue Price, and the balance shall be allocated to institutional investors on a discretionary basis and to issue the balance 10% of the net offer to the public at the fixed price determined by book building exercise. The Company has decided to follow this option. In this regard, the Company has appointed JM Morgan Stanley Ltd. as the Book Running Lead Manager to the Issue to procure subscription to the Issue.
The process of Book Building under SEBI guidelines is relatively new and Investors are advised to make their own judgement about investment through this process prior to making a Bid or application in the Issue.
Steps to be taken by the Investor for Bidding :
UNDERWRITING AGREEMENTS
Book Built Portion
After the determination of the Issue Price and prior to filing of the Offer Document with RoC, the Company would enter into an Underwriting Agreement with the BRLM and the Syndicate Members for the Equity Shares proposed to be offered through the Book Building Portion. It is proposed that in terms of the Underwriting Agreement, the BRLM shall be responsible for bringing in the amount devolved in the event that the Syndicate Members do not fulfil their underwriting obligations.
The Underwriters have indicated their intention to underwrite the following number of shares.
(This portion has been intentionally left blank and will be filled in before filing of the Offer Document with RoC)
Name and Address of the Underwriter |
Indicated No. of Shares to be Underwritten |
Amount Underwritten (Rs. Crore) |
JM Morgan Stanley Ltd. 141, Maker Chambers III, Nariman Point, Mumbai 400 021 |
|
|
The above mentioned is indicative underwriting and this would be finalised after the pricing and actual allocation.
The above underwriting agreement is dated [·].
In the opinion of the Board of the Company (based on a certificate given to it by BRLM(s)) and in the opinion of the BRLM(s) on the basis of the declarations given by the Underwriters, the resources of all the above mentioned Underwriters are sufficient to enable them to discharge their respective underwriting obligations in full. All the above mentioned Underwriters are registered with SEBI under Section 12(i) of the SEBI Act. All the above Underwriting Agreements have been accepted by the Board of the Company at their meeting held on [·] 2000 and the Company has issued letters of acceptance to the underwriters.
Allocation amongst BRLM/Syndicate Members may not necessarily be in proportion to the underwriting commitments. Allocation to Bidders is discretionary as per the terms of the Draft Offer Document and may not be proportionate in any way and the patterns of allocation to the Bidders could be different across the BRLM and Syndicate Members.
FIXED PRICE PORTION
The Equity Shares proposed to be offered through the Fixed Price Portion are fully underwritten. The Underwriters have indicated their intention to underwrite the following number of shares.
(This portion has been intentionally left blank and will be filled in before filing of the Offer Document with RoC)
Name and Address of the Underwriter |
Indicated No. of Shares to be Underwritten |
Amount Underwritten (Rs. Crore) |
JM Morgan Stanley Ltd. 141, Maker Chambers III, Nariman Point, Mumbai 400 021 |
|
|
Enam Financial Consultants Private Limited 801/802 Dalamal Towers, Nariman Point, Mumbai 400 021 |
|
|
The above mentioned is indicative underwriting and this would be finalised after the pricing and actual allocation.
The above underwriting agreement is dated [·].
In the opinion of the Board of the Company and in the opinion of the BRLM, based on the declaration given by the Underwriters, the resources of all the above mentioned Underwriters are sufficient to enable them to discharge their respective underwriting obligations in full. All the above mentioned Underwriters are registered with SEBI under Section 12(i) of the SEBI Act. All the above Underwriting Agreements have been accepted by the Board of the Company at their meeting held on ______ 2000 and the Company has issued letters of acceptance to the underwriters.
II. CAPITAL STRUCTURE
SHARE CAPITAL |
Rs in million |
||
Face Value |
Aggregate Value |
||
AUTHORISED CAPITAL |
|
|
|
42,500,000 |
Equity Shares of Rs 3/- each |
127.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
ISSUED AND SUBSCRIBED CAPITAL |
|
|
|
33,895,120 |
Equity Shares of Rs 3/- each |
101.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
PAID-UP CAPITAL |
|
|
|
32,446,120 |
Equity Shares of Rs 3/- each fully Paid up |
97.34 |
|
1,449,000 |
Equity Shares of Rs 3/- each, Rs. 1/- Paid up@ |
1.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
PRESENT ISSUE TO THE PUBLIC IN TERMS OF THIS DRAFT OFFER DOCUMENT# |
|
|
|
[· ] |
Equity Shares of Rs 3/- each |
[· ] |
520.0* |
|
|
|
|
EQUITY CAPITAL AFTER THE ISSUE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[· ] |
Equity Shares of Rs 3/- each |
[· ] |
|
|
|
|
|
SHARE PREMIUM ACCOUNT |
|
|
|
|
Before the Issue |
[· ] |
|
|
After the Issue |
[· ] |
|
# Includes Book Built Portion of [· ] Equity Shares of Rs. 3/- each aggregating Rs. [· ] million (90% of the Issue Size) and Fixed Price Portion of [· ] Equity Shares (10% of the Issue Size) of Rs. 3/- each aggregating at least Rs. 520 million.
* In case the price determined pursuant to Book Building results in a less than 10% dilution of the Post Issue capital of the Company, then the Company would issue 3,800,000 Equity Shares at the Issue Price to ensure at least 10% post Issue dilution and in such case the Issue size would increase accordingly and will be updated in the Offer Document to be filed with the RoC.
@
The Shares have been issued at the price to be determined through this Issue and will be made fully paid-up on determination of the Issue Price subsequent to the Book Building exercise and prior to the RoC filing.The addition to Share Premium Account on account of the Public Issue and the balance in the Share Premium Account after the Issue can be determined only after the Issue Price is known after the Book Building Process.
Notes to the Capital Structure
S No |
Date of Allotment |
Date on which made fully paid-up |
No of Shares |
Face Value |
Issue Price |
Nature of Payment |
Cumulative Share Premium |
1 |
04-10-95 |
04-10-95 |
600 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
Cash |
Nil |
2 |
31-08-96 |
31-08-96 |
1,005,595 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
Cash |
Nil |
3 |
18-01-97 |
18-01-97 |
52,779 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
Cash |
Nil |
4 |
27-10-97 |
27-10-97 |
103,209 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
Cash |
Nil |
5 |
08-07-98 |
08-07-98 |
49,088 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
Cash |
Nil |
6 |
11-01-99 |
11-01-99 |
1,360,030 |
10.00 |
29.98 |
Cash |
27,178,005 |
7 |
18-10-99 |
18-10-99 |
709,310 |
10.00 |
30.69 |
Cash |
41,854,905 |
|
|
|
10,935,370@ |
3.00 |
|
|
|
8 |
03-05-00 |
03-05-00 |
36,356 |
3.00 |
3.00 |
Cash |
41,854,905 |
9 |
23-05-00 |
23-05-00 |
4,501,334 |
3.00 |
3.00 |
Cash |
41,854,905 |
10 |
30-05-00 |
12-06-00 |
15,473,060 |
3.00 |
- |
Bonus* |
Nil |
11 |
07-09-00 |
07-09-00 |
1,500,000 |
3.00 |
3.00 |
Cash |
Nil |
11 |
07-09-00 |
# |
1,449,000 |
3.00 |
Issue Price |
Cash |
|
Total |
|
3.00 |
|
|
|
# The shares have been allotted at the Issue Price. These shares will be made fully paid up before filing the Offer Document with the RoC, after determination of Issue Price through Book Building exercise. These shares are currently partly paid-up with Rs. 1/- paid-up per share towards the Share Capital. In case the Company decides to cancel its IPO, these shares would be made fully paid-up at a price to be decided by the Board.
@ The Members of the Company vide their resolution passed at the Extra-Ordinary General Meeting held on January 09, 2000 approved the reduction of par value of Equity Share from Rs.10/- to Rs.3/- per share. Consequently, the number of Equity Shares issued as on date of the EGM stands increased from 3,280,611 Equity Shares of Rs.10/- each to 10,935,370 equity shares of Rs.3/- each.
* Pursuant to the Resolution passed by the members of the Company at AGM held on May 30, 2000, the Board of Directors vide their resolution dated June 12, 2000 have allotted 15,473,060 fully paid-up Equity Shares by way of bonus in the ratio of one Equity share for every Equity share held by the then existing shareholders. The Bonus shares have been issued by capitalisation of General Reserves and Share Premium account.
Sr. No. |
Name of the promoter |
Date of Allotment |
Date when Made Fully Paid-up |
Consideration (Cash, bonus, kind, etc.) |
No. of Shares |
Face Value (Rs.) |
Issue Price (Rs.) |
% of Post- Issue paid-up Capital |
Lock-in Period |
1 |
S. Parthasarathy |
12-06-2000 |
12-06-2000 |
Bonus |
3/- |
Nil |
# |
||
2 |
V. Swaminathan |
12-06-2000 |
12-06-2000 |
Bonus |
3/- |
Nil |
# |
||
3 |
e4e Holdings Limited |
12-06-2000 |
12-06-2000 |
Bonus |
3/- |
Nil |
# |
||
4 |
e4e Holdings Limited |
07-09-2000 |
Post Book Building |
Cash |
3/- |
Issue Price |
# |
||
Total |
20.0% |
# 20% of the post issue capital as mentioned herein above would be locked in for a period of three years from the date of Allotment in this Public Issue.
Promoters have undertaken to offer in aggregate 20% of the Post Issue Capital for Lock-in.
Sr. No. |
Name of the Option holder |
No. of Options/Shares |
Face Value (Rs.) |
Issue Price (Rs.) |
% of Post- Issue paid-up Capital |
Lock-in Period |
1 |
V. R. Govindarajan |
381,667 |
3 |
3 |
|
# |
2 |
K.N. Kumar |
29,334 |
3 |
3 |
|
# |
3 |
Shuvankar Banerjee |
74,667 |
3 |
3 |
|
# |
4 |
Debasish Chakraborty |
161,334 |
3 |
3 |
|
# |
5 |
Nirmalaya Sen |
74,667 |
3 |
3 |
|
# |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
# Equity Shares as mentioned herein above would be locked in for a period of three years from date of Allotment in this Public Issue.
No. |
Name of the Promoter |
No of shares |
Nature of Transfer |
Price |
1 |
S. Parthasarathy |
120,000 |
Sale |
Nil (Gift) |
(to be updated by incorporating the information in this regard till the time of filing the Offer Document with the RoC)
Sr. No. |
Name of the Shareholders |
No. of shares |
1 |
e4e Holdings Limited, Mauritius |
15,627,280 |
2 |
Aztec Software & Technology Services Employees' Welfare Trust |
10,486,668 |
3 |
Parthasarathy. S |
4,879,000 |
4 |
Swaminathan. V |
2,018,786 |
5 |
Thomas Joseph |
233,132 |
6 |
Satyendra Hombali |
120,012 |
7 |
JM Morgan Stanley Limited |
100,000 |
8 |
Radhika Gulati |
66,670 |
9 |
Sunil Gulati |
34,860 |
10 |
Chandrasekhar. S |
28,980 |
Sr. No. |
Name of the Shareholders |
No. of shares |
1 |
e4e Holdings Limited, Mauritius |
14,377,280 |
2 |
Aztec Software & Technology Services Pvt. Ltd. Employee Welfare Trust |
8,986,668 |
3 |
S. Parthasarthy |
4,879,000 |
4 |
V. Swaminathan |
2,018,786 |
5 |
Thomas Joseph |
233,132 |
6 |
Satyendra Hombali |
120,012 |
7 |
Radhika Gulati |
66,670 |
8 |
Sunil Gulati |
34,860 |
9 |
S Chandrasekar |
28,980 |
10 |
Bharat Sethuraman |
21,786 |
Sr. No. |
Name of the Shareholder |
No. of Shares |
1 |
Mr. S.Parthasarathy |
2,501,000 |
2 |
Mr. V.Swaminathan |
1,009,393 |
3 |
Mr. Thomas Joseph |
116,566 |
4 |
Mr. S. Chandrashekaran |
115,923 |
5 |
Mr. Bharat Sethuraman |
87,150 |
6 |
Mr. Satyendra Hombali |
60,006 |
7 |
Mr. Krishna Prasad |
58,100 |
8 |
Mrs. Radhika Gulati |
33,335 |
9 |
Mr. Shankar Mahalingam |
29,667 |
10 |
Mr. Sunil Gulati |
17,430 |
Save as stated elsewhere, none of the above shareholders hold any warrants, options or rights to convert debentures, loans or other instruments as on the date.
Category |
Pre-Issue |
Post-Issue |
||
|
No. of Shares |
%age |
No. of Shares |
%age |
Promoter Group |
22,645,066 |
66.81 |
22,645,066 |
|
Employees (Trust) |
10,486,668 |
30.94 |
10,486,668 |
|
Others |
763,386 |
2.25 |
763,386 |
|
Public |
Nil |
- |
|
|
Total |
33,895,120 |
100.00 |
|
|
Name |
Date of Allotment / Acquisition |
Nature |
Face Value (Rs.) |
Issue Price/ Consideration (Rs.) |
No. of Shares |
S. Parthasarathy |
04-Oct-95 |
Cash |
3.00 |
3.00 |
1000 |
S. Parthasarathy |
30-Aug-96 |
Cash |
3.00 |
3.00 |
2,375,000 |
V. Swaminathan |
30-Aug-96 |
Cash |
3.00 |
3.00 |
501,737 |
V. Swaminathan |
27-Oct-97 |
Cash |
3.00 |
3.00 |
344,030 |
V. Swaminathan |
08-Jul-98 |
Cash |
3.00 |
3.00 |
163,626 |
S. Parthasarathy |
13-Nov-98 |
Purchase |
3.00 |
3.00 |
1000 |
E4e Holdings Limited |
11-Jan-99 |
Cash |
3.00 |
9.00 |
4,533,433 |
E4e Holdings Limited |
06-Jun-99 |
Purchase |
3.00 |
6.00 |
87,150 |
E4e Holdings Limited |
06-Jun-99 |
Purchase |
3.00 |
6.00 |
58,100 |
E4e Holdings Limited |
06-Jun-99 |
Purchase |
3.00 |
6.00 |
29,667 |
E4e Holdings Limited |
06-Jun-99 |
Purchase |
3.00 |
6.00 |
115,923 |
E4e Holdings Limited |
18-Oct-99 |
Cash |
3.00 |
9.21 |
2,364,367 |
E4e Holdings Limited |
12-Jun-00 |
Bonus |
3.00 |
Nil |
7,188,640 |
S. Parthasarathy |
12-Jun-00 |
Bonus |
3.00 |
Nil |
2,502,000 |
V. Swaminathan |
12-Jun-00 |
Bonus |
3.00 |
Nil |
1,009,393 |
Anand Sunderrajan |
21-Aug-00 |
Purchase |
3.00 |
Nil |
20,000 |
Kannan S.R |
21-Aug-00 |
Purchase |
3.00 |
Nil |
10,000 |
Mythili Narasimhan |
21-Aug-00 |
Purchase |
3.00 |
Nil |
20,000 |
Ramesh Sundararajan |
21-Aug-00 |
Purchase |
3.00 |
Nil |
20,000 |
Ranganayaki S. |
21-Aug-00 |
Purchase |
3.00 |
Nil |
10,000 |
Srinivasan K.Suresh |
21-Aug-00 |
Purchase |
3.00 |
Nil |
20,000 |
Sundararajan G. |
21-Aug-00 |
Purchase |
3.00 |
Nil |
10,000 |
Vasanthi Kannan |
21-Aug-00 |
Purchase |
3.00 |
Nil |
10,000 |
E4e Holdings Limited |
07-Sep-00 |
Cash |
3.00 |
Issue Price |
1,250,000 |
Total |
22,645,066 |
Name |
Associated with Body Corporate |
% Shareholding |
Mr. K.B. Chandrasekhar |
e4e Holdings Limited |
Nil* |
Mr. Lalitha Anundee |
e4e Holdings Limited |
Nil* |
Mr. Lee Kwee Tai Tsang Chung |
e4e Holdings Limited |
Nil* |
* e4e Holdings Limited, Mauritius is a 100% owned subsidiary of e4e Inc., USA
Name |
Date |
Face Value (Rs.) |
Issue Price (Rs.) |
No. of Shares |
Part of Promoter Group |
Reason |
e4e Holdings Limited |
18/10/99 |
3 |
9.2 |
2,364,367 |
Yes |
Fund Expansion |
Chandrasekar.S |
03/05/00 |
3 |
3 |
14,490 |
No |
Fund Expansion |
Shankar Mahalingam |
03/05/00 |
3 |
3 |
3,710 |
No |
Fund Expansion |
Krishnaprasad |
03/05/00 |
3 |
3 |
7,263 |
No |
Fund Expansion |
Bharat Sethuraman |
03/05/00 |
3 |
3 |
10,893 |
No |
Fund Expansion |
Venkat Subramania Raju |
23/05/00 |
3 |
3 |
8,000 |
No |
Fund Expansion |
Aztec Software & Technology Services Limited Employees Welfare Trust |
23/05/00 |
3 |
3 |
4,493,334 |
No |
Under Employee Stock Option Plan of the Company |
Aztec Software & Technology Services Limited Employees Welfare Trust |
07/09/00 |
3 |
3 |
1,500,000 |
No |
Under Employee Stock Option Plan of the Company |
(a) |
Options granted August 31, 2000 |
748,000 |
(b) |
The pricing formula |
At par value of Rs. 3/- per share |
(c) |
Options vested August 31, 2000 |
8,598 |
(d) |
Options exercised |
Nil |
(e) |
The total number of shares arising as a result of exercise of option |
Nil |
(f) |
Options lapsed |
Nil |
(g) |
Variation of terms of options |
Nil |
(h) |
Money realised by exercise of options |
Nil |
(i) |
Total number of options in force (through the Trust); |
1,500,000 |
(j) |
Employee wise details of options granted:- |
|
|
(i) Senior managerial personnel: Dick Crisman Chinni Kommi Raghuram.S Murugavel Selvan |
210,000 100,000 130,000 130,000 |
|
(ii) Any other employee who receives a grant in any one year of option amounting to 5% or more of option granted during that year. Dick Crisman (99-00) Chinni Kommi (99-00) Raghuram S. (99-00) Murugavel Selvan (99-00) Maneesh Reddy (99-00) Ravishankar.K (99-00) |
210,000 100,000 130,000 130,000 40,000 40,000 |
|
(iii) Identified employees who were granted option, during any one year, equal to or exceeding 1% of the issued capital (excluding outstanding warrants and conversions) of the company at the time of grant; |
Nil |
(k) |
Diluted Earnings Per Share (EPS) pursuant to issue of shares on exercise of option calculated in accordance with International Accounting Standard (IAS) 33. |
Not Meaningful |
All these options have been granted to the Employees and consultants of the subsidiary.
(a) |
Options granted August 31, 2000 |
7,719,968 |
(b) |
The pricing formula |
At par value of Rs. 3/- per share |
(c) |
Options vested as on August 31, 2000 |
2,703,930 |
(d) |
Options exercised |
Nil |
(e) |
The total number of shares arising as a result of exercise of option |
Nil |
(f) |
Options lapsed |
Nil |
(g) |
Variation of terms of options |
Nil |
(h) |
Money realised by exercise of options |
Nil |
(i) |
Total number of options in force (through the Trust) |
8,986,668 |
(j) |
Employee wise details of options granted:- |
|
|
(i) Senior managerial personnel: B.G.Balakrishna V.R.Govindarajan A.G.Muralikrishnan Srikanth Karra Ashok Krishnamoorthy |
350,000 1,908,334 211,400 100,000 287,266 |
|
(ii) Any other employee who receives a grant in any one year of option amounting to 5% or more of option granted during that year (not adjusted for Bonus): Debasish Chakraborty (98-99) Shuvankar Banerjee (98-99) Nirmalya Sen (98-99) Ashok Krishnamoorthy(Q.E - 30/06/2000) |
403,334 186,667 186,667 66,000 |
|
(iii) Identified employees who were granted option, during any one year, equal to or exceeding 1% of the issued capital (excluding outstanding warrants and conversions) of the company at the time of grant (not adjusted for Bonus): V.R.Govindarajan (98-99) Debasish Chakraborty (98-99) Shuvankar Banerjee (98-99) Nirmalya Sen (98-99) |
946,667 403,334 186,667 186,667 |
(k) |
Diluted Earnings Per Share (EPS) pursuant to issue of shares on exercise of option calculated in accordance with International Accounting Standard (IAS) 33. |
Not Meaningful |
III. TERMS OF THE PRESENT ISSUE
The Equity Shares now being offered are subject to the provisions of the Act, the Memorandum and Articles, conditions of the RBI approval, the terms of the Draft Offer Document, Bid Form, the Revision Form and Application Form and other terms and conditions as may be incorporated in the Share Certificates/Letters of Allotment and other documents/certificates that may be executed in respect of the Equity Shares. Further to the above, the Equity Shares shall also be subject to laws as applicable, guidelines, notifications and regulations relating to the issue of capital and listing of securities issued from time to time by SEBI/Government of India/Stock Exchange/RBI and/or other authorities, as in force on the date of the Issue and to the extent applicable.
AUTHORITY FOR THE ISSUE
The Issue has been authorised by a Special Resolution passed, pursuant to Section 81(1A) of the Act, at the Extra Ordinary General Meeting of the Members of the Company held on May 11, 2000 and a resolution passed by the Board of Directors at its meeting held on May 15, 2000.
RANKING OF EQUITY SHARES
The Equity Shares now being offered shall rank pari passu with the existing Equity Shares of the Company.
MODE OF PAYMENT OF DIVIDEND
Payment of dividend on Equity Shares will be made by cheques payable at par at such places as Aztec may deem fit. In case cheques payable at par facility is not available, Aztec reserves the right to adopt any other suitable mode of payment.
FACE VALUE AND ISSUE PRICE
The Equity Shares having a Face Value of Rs. 3/- each are being offered at a price of Rs. [· ] per share. At any given point of time there shall be only one denomination for the shares of the company and the company shall comply with disclosure and accounting norms specified by SEBI.
RIGHTS OF THE EQUITY SHAREHOLDER
a) Right to receive dividend, if declared
b) Right to attend general meetings and exercise voting powers, unless prohibited by law
c) Right to vote on a poll either in person or by proxy
d) Right to receive offers for rights shares and be allotted bonus shares
MARKET LOT
The market lot would be 50 shares. However, if the trades in Equity Shares of the Company are done in dematerialised form, then the tradable lot would be one share.
DENOMINATION OF CERTIFICATE
Consolidated Share Certificate(s) will be issued to investors applying for Equity Shares in physical form.
NOMINATION FACILITY TO INVESTOR
In accordance with Section 109A of the Act, the sole or first Bidder/Applicant, along with other joint Bidder/Applicants may nominate any one person in whom, in the event of the death of sole Bidder/Applicant or in case of joint Bidders/Applicants, death of all the Bidders/Applicants, as the case may be, the Equity Shares allotted, if any, shall vest. A person, being a nominee, becoming entitled to the Equity Shares by reason of the death of the original holder(s), shall in accordance with Section 109A of the Act, be entitled to the same advantages to which he would be entitled if he were the registered holder of the Equity Share(s). Where the nominee is minor, the holder(s) may make a nomination to appoint, in the prescribed manner, any person to become entitled to Equity Share(s) in the event of his/her death during the minority. A nomination shall stand rescinded upon a sale of Equity Share(s) by the person nominating. A buyer will be entitled to make a fresh nomination in the manner prescribed. Fresh nomination can be made only on the prescribed form available on request at the Registered Office of the Company/Registrar.
Any person who becomes a nominee by virtue of the provisions of Section 109A of the Act, shall upon the production of such evidence as may be required by the Board, elect either:-
a. To be registered himself as holder of Equity Shares or
b. To make such transfer of the Equity Shares, as the deceased holder could have made
Further, the Board may at any time give notice requiring any nominee to elect either to be registered himself or to transfer the Equity Shares, and if the notice is not complied with in 90 days, the Board may thereafter withhold payment of all dividends, bonuses or other moneys payable in respect of the Equity Shares, until the requirements of the notice have been complied with.
SUBSCRIPTION BY NON-RESIDENTS/FIIs/OCBs
The Company has received approval of the RBI vide their letter No.[· ] dated [· ], for issuing Equity Shares to non-residents of Indian nationality/origin (NRIs)/OCBs (predominantly owned by NRIs)/FIIs with repatriation benefits. Hence it will not be necessary for the investors to seek separate permission from RBI. However it is to be distinctly understood that there is no reservation for NRIs, OCBs and FIIs and all NRI, OCB and FII applicants will be treated on the same basis with other categories.
The allotment of the Equity Shares to Non-Residents shall be subject to RBI approval or any requisite permission as may be necessary under the existing Exchange Control Regulations.
ISSUE STRUCTURE
The Present Issue of [· ] Equity Shares of Rs. 3/- each for cash issued at a premium of Rs [·] per share aggregating Rs. 520 million, consisting of Book Built Portion of [· ] Equity Shares (90% of the Issue size) and a Fixed Price Portion of [· ] Equity Shares (10% of the Issue size).
|
Book Built Portion |
Fixed Price Portion |
||
Percentage of Issue Size |
90% |
10% |
||
|
Institutional Investors |
Non-Institutional Investors |
Retail Bidders |
|
No. of Shares |
Book Building Portion less allocation to non-institutional investors and Retail Bidders |
[ · ] |
[ · ] # |
[ · ] |
Percentage of Issue Size |
Book Building Portion less allocation to non-institutional investors and Retail Bidders |
Minimum 15% # |
Minimum 15% # |
10% |
Basis of Allocation/ Allotment |
Discretionary |
Proportionate |
Proportionate |
Proportionate |
Minimum Bid/ Application Size |
1,100 shares and in multiples of 50 shares thereafter |
1,100 shares and in multiples of 50 shares thereafter |
50 shares and in multiples of 50 shares thereafter |
50 shares and thereafter in multiples of 50 shares |
Maximum Bid/ Application size |
Restricted to maximum number of Equity shares that can be held by the investor(for details refer to para B & C below) |
Not exceeding the total Book Building Portion |
1000 Equity Shares |
1000 Equity Shares |
Allotment Mode |
Compulsory in Electronic Mode |
Compulsory in Electronic Mode |
Demat or Physical* |
Demat or Physical* |
Market lot |
50 |
50 |
50 |
50 |
Who can Apply |
Banks, Financial Institutions, Mutual Funds, Foreign Institutional Investors, multilateral development agencies and venture capital funds |
Resident Indian Individuals, HUF (in the name of Karta), Companies, Corporate Bodies, NRIs, OCBs, Societies and Trusts |
Individuals (including NRIs and HUFs) applying for up to 1000 Equity Shares |
Individual investors (including HUF (in the name of Karta) and NRIs) who have not participated in the Book Building Portion or did not receive an allocation in Book Building Portion. |
Terms of Payment |
Full Bid amount on Bidding unless waived by the BRLM |
Full Bid amount on Bidding unless waived by the BRLM |
Full Bid amount on Bidding unless waived by the BRLM |
Full Issue Price (as discovered through Book Building Process) multiplied by number of shares applied for on Application. |
# Subject to valid bids being received at or above the Issue Price.
* Pursuant to clause 6.34(c) of SEBI Guidelines 2000, the trading in the securities of the Company shall be in dematerialized form only for all investors. Thus, investors in their own interest are advised to apply for securities in dematerialized form.
Book Built Portion
The investors are required to submit their bids through Syndicate Members. Atleast 15% of the Issue shall be allocated on a proportionate basis each to Non-Institutional investors and Retail Biddders, subject to valid bids being received at or above Issue price, and the balance Book Built Portion shall be allocated to Institutional Investors who have bid at or above the Issue Price on a discretionary basis by the Company in consultation with the BRLM. The Company in consultation with the BRLM reserves the right to reject any Bid procured by any or all Syndicate Members without assigning any reason therefor.
Investors should note that Equity Shares would be issued to the successful allottes (other than the Retail Bidders desirous of obtaining shares in physical form), only in the dematerialized form.
Bidders shall only use the specified Bid Form bearing the stamp of a Syndicate Member for the purpose of making a Bid in terms of this Draft Offer Document. The Bidder shall have the option to make a maximum of three Bids in their Bid Form and such options shall not be considered as multiple applications. Upon the allocation of Equity Shares, dispatch of CAN and filing of Draft Offer Document with RoC, the Bid Form shall be considered as the Application Form. Upon filling of the Bid Form, the Bidder is deemed to have authorised the Company to make the necessary changes in this Draft Offer Document and Bid Form as would be required for filing the Draft Offer Document with RoC and as would be required by the RoC after such filing, without prior or subsequent notice of such changes to the Bidder.
The prescribed colour of the Bid Form for various categories, is as follows:
Category |
Colour of Bid cum Application Form |
Public and NRI/OCB applying on non-repatriation basis |
White |
NRI/OCB/FII applying on repatriation benefit |
Blue |
Note: Book Running Lead Manager, Syndicate Members and any associate of Book Running Lead Manager, Syndicate Members (except Asset Management Companies of Mutual Funds, banks and Indian Financial Institutions) cannot participate in the Book Built Portion where allocation is discretionary. Further BRLM shall not be entitled to subscribe to the Issue in any manner except by virtue of devolvement of underwriting.
Bidders are advised to ensure that single Bid from them should not exceed the investment Limits/maximum number of shares than can be held by them under the applicable regulations/statutory guidelines.
As per the current regulations the following restrictions are applicable for investments by different categories of the Bidder:
Mutual Funds:
No mutual fund scheme shall invest more than 10% of its Net Asset Value in the equity shares or equity related instruments of any Company provided that the limit of 10% shall not be applicable for investments in Index Funds or sector or industry specific fund.
No mutual fund under all its scheme should own more than 10% of any Company’s paid-up capital carrying voting rights.
Foreign Institutional Investors
The purchase of equity shares of each company by a Foreign Institutional Investor investing on his own account shall not exceed 10 percent of the total issued capital of that Company. In respect of a Foreign Institutional Investor investing in equity shares of a Company on behalf of his sub-accounts, the investment on behalf of each such sub-account shall not exceed 10 percent of the total issued capital of that Company. Total investment in equity or equity related instruments by a FII, in India shall comply with the conditions imposed by SEBI while granting the investment permission to FII.
The above information is given for the benefit of the Bidders. The Company/BRLM is not liable for any modification that may happen after the Date of this Draft Offer Document. Bidders are advised to make their independent investigations and ensure that their number of shares bid for doesn’t exceed the limits applicable to them in terms of the laws/regulations applicable to them.
For Retail Bidders
The Bid must be for a minimum of 50 Equity Shares and in multiples of 50 Equity Shares thereafter subject to a maximum of 1000 Equity Shares. In case the Bid is for more than 1000 Equity Shares, the same would be considered for allocation under Non Institutional category.
For Other Bidders
The Bid must be for a minimum of 1,100 Equity Shares and in multiples of 50 Equity Shares thereafter. A Bid cannot be submitted for an amount, which exceeds the amount offered for subscription under Book Building Portion i.e. Rs 468 million. However, maximum Bid size by an Institutional Investor should not exceed the investment limits prescribed for them by the regulatory/statutory authorities governing them.
The Company shall open Escrow Accounts of the Company with one or more Escrow Collection Banks in whose favour the Bidder shall make out the cheque or demand draft in respect of his or her bid and/or revision. The Escrow Collection Banks will act in terms of this Draft Offer Document and an Escrow Agreement of the Company to be entered into between the BRLM, the Company, the Escrow Collection Bank and the Registrars to the Issue. The monies in the Escrow Account of the Company shall be maintained by the Escrow Collection Bank for and on behalf of the Bidders. The Escrow Collection Bank shall not exercise any lien whatsoever over the monies deposited therein, and shall hold the monies therein in trust for the investors, and on or after the Book Building Issue Opening Date transfer the monies to the Public Issue Account with the Bankers to the Issue in terms of the Escrow Agreement of the Company. The Bidders may note that the Escrow Mechanism is not prescribed by SEBI and the same has been established as an arrangement between the Escrow Collection Bank(s), the Company, the Registrars to the Issue and BRLM, to facilitate collections from the Bidders.
Each Bidder shall, with the submission of the Bid cum Application Form draw a cheque/demand draft/Stockinvest for the maximum amount of his bid in favour of the Escrow Account of the Escrow Collection Bank (refer Payment Instructions for further details) and submit the same to the Syndicate Member (s). Bid form accompanied by cash shall not be accepted. The Bid Amount has to be paid at the time of bidding based on the highest bidding option of the Bidder. The Syndicate Member(s) shall deposit such cheque/demand draft/Stockinvest with the Escrow Collection Bank, which will hold the monies for the benefit of the Bidders till such time as the Issue Opening Date. During the Issue period, the Escrow Collection Bank shall transfer the funds from the Escrow Account, as per the terms of the Escrow Agreement, into the Public Issue Account with the Bankers to the Issue.
The Syndicate Member(s) may at their discretion waive such payment at the time of the submission of the Bid Form. Where such payment at the time of bidding is waived at the discretion of the Syndicate Member, the Issue Price, shall be payable for the allocated shares no later than the date specified in the CAN which shall be subject to a minimum period being not less than two days. If the payment is not made favouring the Escrow Account of the Company within the time stipulated above, the Bid of the Bidder is liable to be cancelled.
However, if the BRLM/Syndicate Member does not waive such payment, the full amount of payment has to be made.
Where the bidder has been allocated lesser number of Equity Shares than he or she had bid for, the excess amount paid on bidding, if any, after adjustment for allocation, will be refunded to such bidder within 15 days from the Date of Bid Closing.
The allocation of securities relating to the Book Built Portion shall be made within 15 days from the Offer Closing Date for Book Built Portion. The Company shall pay interest @ 15% p.a. if allocation is not made within 15 days from the Issue Closing Date for Book Built Portion and refund orders/cancelled stockinvests are not dispatched to the Bidders within 15 days of Bid Closing Date, for any delay beyond 15 days.
It is also to be distinctly understood that the approval given by NSE should not in any way be deemed or construed that the Draft Offer Document has been cleared or approved by NSE; nor does it in any manner warrant, certify or endorse the correctness or completeness of any of the contents of this Draft Offer Document; nor does it warrant that the securities will be listed or will continue to be listed on the Exchange.
Syndicate Member(s), Registrars, BRLM or the Company will have the right but not the obligation to reject any Bid on one or more of the following technical grounds:
Amount paid doesn’t tally with the highest number of shares bid for, Bank account details (for refund) are not given, Age of first applicant not given, Application by Minor, PAN/GIR No. not given if application is for Rs. 50,000/- or more, Bids at a price less than the floor price announced, Bids at cut-off price, Bids for number of shares which are not in multiples of 50. Category not ticked, Multiple application as defined elsewhere. In case of application under power of Attorney or by limited companies, corporates, trust etc., relevant documents are not submitted, Applications accompanied by Stockinvest purchased 10 days prior to Bid Opening Date, Applications accompanied by Stockinvest of value exceeding Rs. 50,000/- by Individuals, Applications accompanied by third party Stockinvest, Right hand side of the Stockinvest is filled up and Applications accompanied by cash exceeding Rs. 20,000/-. Applications by Bidders other than individuals and mutual funds accompanied by Stockinvest, Bid Form does not have the stamp of the Syndicate Member, if the number of Equity Shares bid for is lower than the minimum number of Equity Shares to be bid for in that category.
a) After the Bid Closing Date, the BRLM shall analyse the demand generated and pricing strategy with the Company.
b) The Company in consultation with BRLM will finalise the ‘Issue Price’, the number of Equity Shares to be issued and the allocation to successful Bidders.
c) The allocation for Institutional Investors up to 60% of the Issue size would be discretionary. The Allocation will be decided based on the quality of the bidder determined broadly by the size, price and date of the bid. The allocation for Non-Institutional Investors and Retail Bidders for not less than 15% of the Issue size, each, would be on a proportionate basis subject to valid bids being received at or above the Issue price. Allocation in these category would be made in consultation with the Regional Stock Exchange. For details refer to para on Basis of Allocation/Allotment on page [· ].
d) Undersubscription in any category, would be allowed to be met with spill over from other categories.
e) Allocation to NRIs/FIIs/OCBs applying on repatriation basis will be subject to the terms and conditions stipulated by the RBI while granting permission for Issue of shares to them.
f) The BRLM shall intimate the Syndicate Member of the Issue Price and allocations to their Bidders.
g) The Company reserves the right to cancel the Issue after bidding.
After the Company in consultation with the BRLM determines the Issue Price, a statutory advertisement will be issued by the Company either prior to or after the filing of the Offer Document with the RoC. This advertisement shall in addition to the information that has to be set out in the statutory advertisement indicate the price of the securities along with a table showing the number of securities and the amount payable by an investor. Such advertisement is likely to appear on [Date] 2000 in [Name of the Newspapers].
O. Conversion Option of Bid into a application in the Fixed Price Portion
Only Individual investors (including HUFs and NRIs) who for any reason(s) did not receive an allocation or CAN from the Syndicate Member through whom they participated, shall have the option of being considered for allotment in the Fixed Price Portion subject to their fulfilling the following conditions :
Individual Bidders who exercise the above conversion option, but do not fulfil any of the above conditions will receive refund from the Escrow Account in terms of this Draft Offer Document. The refunds payable for excess amounts deposited by the individual Bidders, who have exercised conversion options which fulfils the above conditions, shall be paid out of the Public Issue Account as per the terms of the Fixed Price Portion. In case of any delay in despatch of refund orders beyond 15 days of the Issue Closing Date for Fixed Price Portion, the Company shall pay interest at 15% per annum (for any delay beyond 15 days as mentioned above).
Bidders opting for the conversion option cannot make another application in the Fixed Price Portion as first/sole applicant. In case the Bidder makes such additional application(s), all the applications including the application resulting from the conversion of the Bid, would be treated as multiple applications and would be liable to be rejected.
Fixed Price Portion
The Equity Shares to be issued under the Fixed Price Portion shall be made available at the Issue Price.
The Fixed Price Portion shall be available for subscription during the Fixed Price Issue Period and not during the Bidding Period.
The trading in the securities of the Company shall be in dematerialised form only for all investors. Investors in their own interest are advised to apply for shares in demat form.
Individual investors (including HUFs and NRIs) who for any reason(s) could not participate in the Book Building Portion during the Bidding Period or did not receive an allocation or CAN from the Syndicate Member through whom they participated, can apply in the Fixed Price Portion. However, investors who have been successful in getting an allocation in the Book Built Portion, Book Running Lead Manager and Syndicate Member are barred from applying for the Fixed Price Portion.
The basis of allotment for the Fixed Price Portion will be finalised in consultation with the Regional Stock Exchange. In case of oversubscription, allotment will be on a proportionate basis and will be finalised in consultation with the Regional Stock Exchange. (For further details please refer to para on Basis of Allotment in case of Fixed Price portion on page [·]).
Equity Shares shall, after the receipt of the entire Issue proceeds, be allotted to the investors within 15 days of the Fixed Price Issue Closes Date. After allotment all allottees who have opted to receive the Equity Shares in the electronic form will receive credit for Equity Shares directly in their depository account. Those allottees who have opted to receive the Equity Shares in the physical form will receive the Equity Shares certificate from the Registrars.
Application must be for a minimum of 50 Equity Shares and in multiples of 50 Equity Shares thereafter. However the maximum application can be for 1,000 Equity Shares only.
The entire Issue price of Rs. [·] is payable at the time of application.
Where an applicant has been allotted lesser number of shares than he/she has applied for, the excess amount paid on application, if any, will be refunded by the Company to the applicants.
As far as possible, allotment of securities relating to the Fixed Price Portion shall be made within 15 days from the Offer Closing Date for Fixed Price Portion. The Company shall pay interest @ 15% p.a. (except to applicants applying through stock invest) if allotment is not made and refund orders are not dispatched to the investors within 15 days from the Issue Closing Date for Fixed Price Portion for any delay beyond 15 days.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
Do's:
Don'ts:
The name of the sole or first Bidder’s bank, branch, type of account and account numbers must be filled in the Bid cum Application Form. This is required for the Bidder’s own safety so that these details can be printed on the refund orders. Bids without these details are liable to be rejected.
It is mandatory for all the Institutional and Non Institutional Bidders to get their Equity Shares using the Depository mode. Retail Bidders have an option to get shares in physical or demat mode. All Bidders should mention their Depository Participant’s name, DP-ID and Beneficiary Account Number in the Bid Form. In case Bid Form is submitted in joint names, it may be ensured that the Depository Account is also held in the same joint names and are in the same sequence in which they appear in the Bid cum Application Form.
In case of bids made under Power of Attorney or by limited companies, corporate bodies, registered societies, etc., a certified copy of the Power of Attorney or the relevant resolution or authority, as the case may be along with a certified copy of the Memorandum and Articles of Association and/or Bye Laws must be lodged alongwith the Bid cum Application Form. Failing this, the Issuer reserves the right to accept or reject any bid in whole or in part, in either case, without assigning any reason therefor.
The bidder, being an individual or mutual fund, has the option to use the stockinvest instrument in lieu of cash/cheques/bank drafts for payment of application money, subject to applicable laws/guidelines. However, in respect of individual bidder, banks have imposed a ceiling of Rs. 50,000/- per individual per stockinvest. Stockinvest instruments are payable at par at all the branches of the issuing bank and as such, outstation stockinvest instruments can be attached to the Bid Form or Revision Form. The applicant may approach the banks concerned for obtaining stockinvest and detailed instructions for the same. Service charges, if any, for issuing the stockinvest must be borne by the bidder.
The bidder has to fill in the following particulars:
1. Title of the Account as mentioned in the Bid form
2. Number of Equity Shares bided for
3. The maximum amount payable as per the options in the Bid Form or Revision Form
4. Name and address of the bidder
The bidder should thereafter sign the instrument. It should also bear the stamp of the bank issuing the instrument and should be crossed "A/c Payee Only" and made payable only to "Aztec Software and Technology Services Ltd." The Bidder should not fill in the portion to be filled up by the Registrars to the Issue (right-hand portion of the instrument).
The Purchaser should use the stockinvest and the name of the Purchaser/one of the Purchasers should be indicated as the first bidder in the Bid Form or Revision Form. Thus, if the signature of the Purchaser on the stockinvest and the signature of the first bidder in the Bid Form or Revision Form do not tally, the bid would be treated as having been accompanied by a third party stockinvest and is liable to be rejected.
The stockinvest instrument should be used by the Purchaser within 10 days from the date of issue of the instrument, failing which such applications are liable to be rejected. For the purpose of calculating the 10 days, the last date for use of the stockinvest for submitting the Bid Form or Revision Form to the BRLM/Syndicate Members is indicated on the face of the stockinvest with a notation "to be used before _____________".
The Registrars to the Issue will fill up the right-hand side of the stockinvest indicating the Equity Shares allotted to the bidder, calculated as follows:
No refund order will be issued to the bidders using stockinvest for payment of the money due while submitting the Bid Form or Revision Form. In case of non-allotment of Equity Shares, the cancelled stockinvest instruments will be returned to the applicant, within 15 days of Issue Closing Date of the Book Building Portion by Registered Post/Speed Post. The bidder will have to approach the issuing bank branch for lifting the lien.
Registrars to the Issue have been authorised by the Company (through a resolution passed by the Board of Directors at its meeting held on June 12, 2000 to sign on behalf of the Company to realise the proceeds of the stockinvest from the issuing bank or to affix non-allotment advice on the instrument, or to cancel the stockinvest(s) of the non-allottees. Such cancelled stockinvest(s) shall be sent back by the Registrars directly to the investors. Stockinvest will be realised through Citibank, N.A. or Deutsche Bank.
Reserve Bank of India vide its Circular No. DBOD No. FSC. BC.100/24.47.001/94 dated September 2, 1994 has restricted the use of Stockinvests to Individual Investors and Mutual Funds only. Stockbrokers, Corporate Bodies, Banks and Financial Institutions are not allowed to apply through Stockinvests. A ceiling of Rs. 50,000/- per individual per Stockinvest by banks has been imposed.
All other conditions mentioned for making a bid through cheque or bank draft will also apply to bids made using Stockinvest.
Note: The above information is given for the benefit of investors and the Company is not liable for any modification of the terms of stockinvest or procedure thereof by the issuing bank.
For further instructions please read the Bid Form carefully
Application forms for the Fixed Price Portion along with the Memorandum containing salient features of Offer Document and copies of the Offer Document may be obtained from the Registered Office of the Company, offices of BRLM/Syndicate Members and Bankers to the Issue named elsewhere in the Offer Document as well as from the collection branches of these Banks listed in the Application form. Forms meant for NRIs can be obtained from the Registered Office of the Company.
(ii) Application must be made:
(iii) Applicant’s Bank Details
The name of the first or sole applicant’s bank, branch, type of account and account number must be filled in the Application Form. This is required for the applicant’s own safety so that these details can be printed on the refund orders. Applications without these details are liable to be rejected.
(iv) Applicant’s Depository Account Details
Applicants have an option to get their Equity Shares using the Depository mode. Applicants desirous of availing this facility should mention their Depository Participant’s name, DP-ID and Beneficiary Account Number in the Application Form. Applicants must indicate in the Application Form, the number of Equity Shares they wish to receive in the electronic form and in the physical form. Further it may be noted that in such cases the allotment of Equity Shares would first be done in electronic form and the remaining in physical form. However, if the same Applicant submits two Application Forms, one for Equity Shares in the physical form and the other for Equity Shares in electronic form, then Application in physical form will be treated as multiple application and would be rejected accordingly. In case of Application Forms submitted in joint names, it may be ensured that the Depository Account is also held in the same joint names and are in the same sequence in which they appear in the Application Form. (For details refer para on option to hold shares in electronic form with CDSL/NSDL). Investors should note that the Trading in the Equity shares of the Company would be in demat form only for all investors.
In the case of applications made under Power of Attorney, a certified copy of the Power of Attorney or the relevant authority to make the application, as the case may be lodged sepa rately, along with a photocopy of the Application form, at the office of the Registrars to the Issue simultaneously with the submission of the Application form (or later but so as to reach the Registrar within 15 days from the Issue Closing Date for Fixed Price Portion), indicating the name of the applicant along with the address, application serial number, date of submission of the Application Form, name of bank and branch where it was deposited, cheque/draft number and bank and branch on which the cheque/draft was drawn. Failing this, the Issuer reserves the right to accept or reject any application in whole or in part, in either case, without assigning any reason therefor.
b) NRIs on a repatriation basis
c) Payment by Stockinvest
An applicant, being an individual or mutual fund, has the option to use the stockinvest instrument in lieu of cash/cheques/bank drafts for payment of application money. However, in respect of individual applicants, banks have imposed a ceiling of Rs. 50,000/- per individual per stockinvest. Stockinvest instruments are payable at par at all the branches of the issuing bank and as such, outstation stockinvest instruments can be attached to the Application form. The applicant may approach the banks concerned for obtaining stockinvest and detailed instructions for the same. Service charges, if any, for issuing the stockinvest must be borne by the applicant.
The applicant has to fill in the following particulars:
1. Title of the Account as mentioned in the Application form.
2. Number of Equity Shares applied for
3. The amount payable on the Equity Shares applied for
4. Name and address of the applicant
The applicant should thereafter sign the instrument. It should also bear the stamp of the bank issuing the instrument and should be crossed "A/c Payee Only" and made payable only to "Aztec Software and Technology Services Ltd". The applicant should not fill in the portion to be filled up by the Registrars to the Issue (right-hand portion of the instrument).
The Purchaser should use the stockinvest and the name of the Purchaser/one of the Purchasers should be indicated as the first applicant in the Application form. Thus, if the signature of the Purchaser on the stockinvest and the signature of the first applicant in the Application Form do not tally, the application would be treated as having been accompanied by a third party stockinvest and is liable to be rejected.
The stockinvest instrument should be used by the Purchaser within 10 days from the date of issue of the instrument, failing which such applications are liable to be rejected. For the purpose of calculating the 10 days, the last date for use of the stockinvest for submitting the Application form to the bank is indicated on the face of the stockinvest with a notation "to be used before _____________".
The Registrars to the Issue will fill up the right-hand side of the stockinvest indicating the Equity Shares allotted to the applicants, calculated as follows:
No refund order will be issued to the applicants using stockinvest for payment of application money. In case of non-allotment of Equity Shares, the cancelled stockinvest instruments will be returned to the applicant, within 15 days of the Issue Closing Date of the Fixed Price Portion by Registered Post/Speed Post. The applicant will have to approach the issuing bank branch for lifting the lien.
Registrars to the Issue have been authorised by the Company (through a resolution passed by the Board of Directors at its meeting held on ________, 2000 to sign on behalf of the Company to realise the proceeds of the stockinvest from the issuing bank or to affix non-allotment advice on the instrument, or to cancel the stockinvest(s) of the non-allottees. Such cancelled stockinvest(s) shall be sent back by the Registrars directly to the investors. Stockinvests will be realised through [· ]Name of the Banker.
Reserve Bank of India vide its Circular No. DBOD No. FSC. BC.100/24.47.001/94 dated September 2, 1994 has restricted the use of Stockinvests by Individual Investors and Mutual Funds only. Stockbrokers, Corporate Bodies, Banks and Financial Institutions are not allowed to apply through Stockinvests. A ceiling of Rs. 50,000/- per individual per Stockinvest by banks has been imposed.
All other conditions mentioned for making an application through cheque or bank draft will also apply to applications made using Stockinvest.
Note: The above information is given for the benefit of investors and the Company is not liable for any modification of the terms of stockinvest or procedure thereof by the issuing bank.
For further instruction, please read the Application Form carefully.
COMMON INSTRUCTIONS (Applicable to both the Book Built Portion and the Fixed Price Portion)
Bids/Applications may be made in single or joint names (not more than three). In the case of joint bid/application, all payments will be made out in favour of the Bidder/Applicant whose name appears first in the Bid cum Application Form or Revision Form or Application form ("first applicant"). All communications will be addressed to the first Bidder/Applicant and will be despatched his/her address.
A bidder/applicant should submit only one bid/application (and not more than one) for the total number of Equity Shares required. Two or more bids/applications will be deemed to be multiple bids/applications if the sole/first bidder/applicant is one and the same.
In case of a mutual fund, a separate bid can be made in respect of each scheme of the mutual fund registered with SEBI and such bids in respect of more than one scheme of the mutual fund will not be treated as multiple bids provided that the bid made clearly indicate their intention as to each scheme concerned for which the bid has been made.
In case of separate bids/applications for Equity Shares in electronic and physical form by the same bidder/applicant, the application in physical form shall be considered as multiple bid/application and will be rejected accordingly.
The Fixed Price Portion is reserved for individual investors who have either not applied or not received allocation in the bidding process. In other words those who have participated in the bidding process and have received allocation shall not be eligible to make an application in the fixed price portion. Such applications will be treated as multiple applications and are liable to be rejected.
Bidders opting for the conversion option cannot make another application in the Fixed Price Portion as first/sole applicant. In case the Bidder makes such additional application(s), all the applications including the application resulting from the conversion of the Bid, would be treated as multiple applications and would be liable to be rejected.
The Board of Directors reserves the right to reject, in its absolute discretion, all or any multiple applications in any or all categories.
Where the maximum bid for Equity Shares by a Bidder/Applicant is for the total value of Rs. 50,000 or more, i.e. the actual numbers of securities bid for multiplied by the bid price, is Rs. 50,000 or more the Bidder or in the case of a bid in joint names, each of the Bidders should mention his or her Permanent Account Number (PAN) allotted under the Income-tax Act, 1961 or where the same has not been allotted, the GIR Number and the Income-Tax Circle/ Ward/District. In case, neither the PAN nor the GIR numbers has been allotted, the Bidders must mention "Not allotted" in the appropriate place. Bid cum Application Forms without this information will be considered incomplete and are liable to be rejected.
As per the provisions of Depositories Act, 1996 the shares of the Company can be held in a dematerialised form, i.e. not in the form of physical certificates but be fungible and be represented by the statement issued through electronic mode. The Company is also extending this facility to all the investors who wish to avail the same. Successful allottees in the Book Built Portion who are not Retail Bidders will be mandatorily allotted shares in dematerialised form. In this context:
Communications
All future communications in connection with bid/applications made in the Issue should be addressed to the Registrars to the Issue quoting full name of the sole/first Bidder/Applicant, Bid Form/Application No., number of shares applied for, date, bank and branch where the application was submitted and cheque/draft/stockinvest no. and issuing bank thereof.
Despatch of Refund Orders
The Company shall ensure despatch of refund orders of value over Rs. 1,500/- and share / debenture certificates by Registered Post / Speed Post only and adequate funds for the purpose shall be made available to the Registrars by the Issuer Company.
Undertaking by the Company
The Company undertakes:
UTILISATION OF ISSUE PROCEEDS
The Board of Directors of the Company certifies that:
The Company shall not have the access to the Issue proceeds till approval for dealing of Equity Shares from all the Stock Exchanges where listing is sought is received.
TAX BENEFITS
The Company has been advised by its Auditors M/s BSR & Co., Chartered Accountants, vide their report dated September 4, 2000 that under the current tax laws, the following tax benefits inter-alia, will be available to the Company and the shareholders of the Company. This advice is being issued on the basis of the statutory provisions applicable on the date of its issue A shareholder is advised to consider in his own case the tax implications of an investment in the shares.
I. BENEFITS TO THE COMPANY
is fully exempt from tax, under section 10(33) of the I.T. Act.
II. BENEFITS TO THE SHAREHOLDERS
In addition, surcharge would be applicable as detailed below:
The shares in the Company will not be subject to wealth-tax under the Wealth-tax Act, 1957.
At present, no gift-tax is levied on the gift of shares or any other assets.
In addition, surcharge would be applicable as detailed below:
In addition, surcharge would be applicable as detailed below:
The shares in the Company will not be subject to wealth-tax under the Wealth-tax Act, 1957.
At present, no gift-tax is levied on the gift of shares or any other assets.
The shares in the Company will not be subject to wealth-tax under the Wealth-tax Act, 1957.
At present, no gift-tax is levied on the gift of shares or any other assets.
IV. PARTICULARS OF THE ISSUE
OBJECTS OF THE ISSUE
The present issue of Equity Shares is being made:
The Main Objects Clause and Objects incidental or ancillary to the Main Objects Clause of the Memorandum of Association of the Company enables the Company to undertake its existing activities and the activities for which the funds are being raised, through the present Issue.
Requirements and Utilization of Funds
To meet the above objects of the Issue, the total fund requirement as estimated by the Company is as under:
Rs. million
Fund Requirement |
Amount |
Ongoing capital expenditure |
|
|
144.00 |
|
257.00 |
Acquisitions and Joint ventures |
84.00 |
Issue expense |
35.00 |
Total |
520.00 |
Means of Finance
The above requirement of funds is proposed to be funded as follows:
Rs. million
Public Issue of [· ] Equity Shares |
520.00 |
Total |
520.00 |
As per the Guidelines issued by the SEBI and the listing guidelines of the Stock Exchanges, the Company is required to issue at least 10% of its Post Issue capital to the public as part of the Public Issue. In case the price determined pursuant to the Book Building issue is such that it results in less than 10% post issue dilution, then the Company would issue 3,800,000 Equity Shares. In such case, the Issue amount would increase accordingly. Since this actual amount of issue proceeds will be determined only after the price discovery mechanism is completed, there is a possibility that the amount raised is greater than the funding requirement as mentioned above. In the eventuality of the issue proceeds being more than the funding requirements, the surplus funds may be used for (a) general corporate purposes including amongst others expansion of business development centre, employee training centre, marketing programs and addition of new service offerings; (b) meeting the additional expenses of the issue; (c) working capital and (d) for investing in possible joint ventures, strategic alliances or acquisitions, though there are no present commitments or agreements or crystallised proposals for any such joint venture, strategic alliance or acquisition. The fund requirement in such cases would be updated before filing the Offer Document with the Registrar of Companies.
Pending the deployment of funds towards the various objects of the Issue, the funds would be deployed in liquid instruments including but not restricted to deposits with banks for the necessary duration. The Board of Directors or a committee thereof, duly empowered in this regard, would authorize such investments.
Details of the Requirement of Funds
- Ongoing Capital expenditure
In anticipation of the increase in the operations of the Company in the near future, the Company intends to scale up its existing infrastructure. Currently the Company operates from 15,000 square feet premises, which can house close to 300 employees. The Company expects that its employee strength will increase in line with the increase in its operations. Thus the Company plans to part finance its ongoing capital expenditure to the extent of Rs. 144 million from the proceeds of this Public Issue. The expansion will include expansion of existing facilities in two phases as well as construction of a new building.
- Expansion of Existing facilities
The expansion would be undertaken in two phases. In Phase I, the Company will be refurbishing an additional 15,000 square feet of area in form of two more floors to its existing two storied leased building. The space would be used for seating new employees, a small cafeteria and health club for the employees. The Company has entered into a MoU with the Lessor for additional office space. This MoU shall be implemented in cognizance with the main lease agreement that the Company has entered into on December 31, 1998 for the leased premises for a period of ten years with effect from February 1, 1999.
In Phase II, the Company will be leasing and refurbishing a new premises of additional 50,000 square feet. This premises will be used as an additional development center. The Company is yet to identify this building and has not identified the suppliers for any equipment that would be required for this building.
The funding requirement for the capital expansion is given in the table below:
Rs. million
Description |
Phase I |
Phase II |
Total |
Computers and Accessories |
19.5 |
51.0 |
70.5 |
Furniture and Fixtures |
5.0 |
15.0 |
20.0 |
Electrical installation |
2.2 |
6.5 |
8.7 |
Other equipments |
3.0 |
10.0 |
13.0 |
Interiors |
3.7 |
10.8 |
14.5 |
Generator |
2.9 |
8.4 |
11.3 |
Air conditioners |
1.0 |
3.0 |
4.0 |
Contingencies |
0.6 |
1.4 |
2.0 |
Total |
37.9 |
106.1 |
144.0 |
The Company has placed orders for all the equipments required for Phase I of the expansion. The Company has not placed any orders nor has invited any quotations for Phase II of the expansion. The following table list the details of the orders placed towards Capital Expenditure for Phase I of the Project.
Imported Equipments
Computers and Accessories
Description |
Supplier |
Country Of Import |
Date of order |
Amount (Rs. million) |
Expected Date of Delivery |
PC's |
DELL Asia Pacific SDN |
Singapore |
05-06-2000 |
12.0 |
Received |
Notebooks |
DELL Asia Pacific SDN |
Singapore |
01-06-2000 |
2.3 |
Received |
Server |
DELL Asia Pacific SDN |
Singapore |
02-06-2000 |
2.4 |
20-09-2000 |
Other Equipments
Description |
Supplier |
Country Of Import |
Date of order |
Amount (Rs. million) |
Expected Date of Delivery |
UPS |
Best Power |
Singapore |
14-06-2000 |
2.0 |
07-09-2000 |
LCD Projector |
Epson Singapore Pvt. Ltd. |
Singapore |
11-07-2000 |
0.15 |
Received |
The cost of total imported equipment is Rs. 18.85 million, which is 50% of the cost of Phase I expenditure. The Company has opened L/C with the Union Bank of India for the above imports, wherever required.
Indigenous Equipments
Computers and Accessories
Description |
Supplier |
Date of order |
Amount (Rs. million) |
Expected Date of Delivery |
Networking |
Frontier |
19-04-2000 |
2.8 |
Received |
Furniture and fixtures
Description |
Supplier |
Date of order |
Amount (Rs. million) |
Expected Date of Delivery |
Modular Furniture |
V 3 Engineers |
25-04-2000 |
4.48 |
Received |
Chairs |
Feather Touch |
27-06-2000 |
0.52 |
Received |
Electrical Supplies
Description |
Supplier |
Date of order |
Amount (Rs. million) |
Expected Date of Delivery |
Electrical Supplies |
Vasuki Contracts |
03-05-2000 |
2.2 |
Received |
Other Equipment
Description |
Supplier |
Date of order |
Amount (Rs. million) |
Expected Date of Delivery |
Telematic Equipment |
Tata Telecom |
05-05-2000 |
0.61 |
Received |
Speaker Phones |
Hotline Communications |
12-06-2000 |
0.03 |
Received |
Fire Alarm Systems |
Alert Safety Equipments |
03-06-2000 |
0.25 |
Received |
Improvements to Building
Description |
Supplier |
Date of order |
Amount (Rs. million) |
Expected Date of Delivery |
False Ceiling |
Fine Interiors |
02-06-2000 |
0.46 |
Completed |
False Flooring |
Gee and Associates |
26-05-2000 |
0.05 |
Completed |
Vertical Blinds |
Noble Sales Corporation |
29-06-2000 |
0.19 |
Received |
Civil works |
Annadurai |
05-05-2000 |
0.35 |
Completed |
Carpentry works |
Arakeshwara |
23-05-2000 |
0.25 |
Completed |
Cafeteria |
Discoy Construction Division |
NA |
2.40 |
15-09-2000 |
Generators
Description |
Supplier |
Date of order |
Amount (Rs. million) |
Expected Date of Delivery |
Diesel Generators |
Canara Diesels |
12-05-2000 |
2.90 |
Received |
Air conditioners
Description |
Supplier |
Date of order |
Amount (Rs. million) |
Expected Date of Delivery |
Air conditioners |
Blue Star |
12-05-2000 |
1.02 |
Received |
Grand Total (Indigenous) |
18.51 |
- Construction of New Building
The Company is currently operating from leased premises. Thus as part of its on-going Capital expansion, the Company would like to build its own premises and expand its activities to a new development center and corporate office. The funding requirement that the Company expects for its new building on a built-up area of 200,000 square feet will be
Description |
Cost (Rs. million) |
Site |
11.2 |
Site Works |
3.6 |
Architectural and Structural work |
93.5 |
Interior works |
32.9 |
Safety and security system |
14.5 |
Public health system |
10.0 |
Electrical works |
49.5 |
Communication works |
22.7 |
Air conditioning works |
9.4 |
Landscape works |
2.0 |
Contingencies |
7.7 |
Total |
257.0 |
The Company is yet to identify the Premises for the proposed new building and is yet to place orders or identify suppliers for all the equipments. The Company believes that majority of equipments will be available indigenously and can be easily procured.
Implementation Schedule for Capital Expenditure
The implementation schedule for the on going capital expansion is given in the table below:
Item |
Phase I |
Phase II |
New building |
Acquisition of land |
- |
- |
November 2000 |
Possession of Premises |
Completed |
October 2000 |
- |
Development of Site |
- |
- |
February 2001 |
Civil Works |
- |
- |
July 2001 |
Equipments
|
Completed September 2000 |
October 2000 December 2000 |
May 2001 July 2001 |
Arrangement of utilities |
September 2000 |
December 2000 |
July 2001 |
Completion |
September 2000 |
January 2001 |
August 2001 |
The Company has to obtain all the requisite Government approvals for its Capital Expenditure for which funds are being raised through this Issue. Since the Company is yet to identify the new premises, it is not in a position to list out all the regulatory approvals that would be required for the new premises. The Company will require registration with Assistant commissioner of Customs as Bonded Warehouse for its proposed new premises. It will also require permission from Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited for the power supply and for use of Generators for the new premises.
- Consolidation of Business through Acquisitions
The Company believes that the rapid growth being witnessed in the e-engineering solutions business, particularly in B2B space with the growth of ASPs and online exchanges, would result in a substantial jump in the demand for technology providers and internet architects well conversant in XML, WML, Java and middleware technologies. In order to be in a position to optimize the revenues from this emerging scenario, it needs to acquire critical mass. This can only happen if it pursues its growth plans by not just building its own in-house strengths but also through judicious inorganic growth, through the process of acquisitions and mergers.
The Company therefore proposes to seek appropriate opportunities for possible acquisitions, joint ventures or strategic alliances and intends to set aside Rs. 84 million from the funds being raised from the present issue towards this object.
The Company does not have any present commitments or crystallized proposal for any such suitable acquisition opportunities. The listing of its Equity Shares would also provide the Company with the flexibility of acquisitions using its shares as currency. Further with a low debt equity ratio, Aztec will be in a position to leverage its balance sheet strength to finance suitable opportunities.
However, acquisitions, joint ventures or strategic alliances may result in difficulties in assimilating the culture, operations and businesses of other companies. The acquisitions may also pose further challenges like management distraction, reduced corporate efficiency, multiple methodologies and less accurate internal controls and weak corporate culture. The Company will endeavour to mitigate such risks associated with acquisition by carefully evaluating strategic suitability of potential targets and opportunities.
- Issue Expenses
The expenses of the Present Issue payable by the Company, inclusive of brokerage, underwriting fees, fees payable to the Book Running Lead Manager and Syndicate Members, fees of Legal Advisors, stamp duty, printing, publication, advertising and distribution expenses, bank charges, fees payable to the Registrars to the Issue, listing fees and other miscellaneous expenses are not likely to exceed Rs. 35 million, and will be met out of the proceeds of the present Issue.
Schedule of Utilization of Issue Proceeds
Period |
Amount (Rs. million) |
Quarter: Oct 2000- Dec 2000 |
184.2 |
Quarter: Apr 2001 – June 2001 |
279.1 |
Quarter: July 2001 – Sep 2001 |
56.7 |
Total |
520.0 |
FUNDS DEPLOYED
The expenditure incurred on various projects up to August 31, 2000, as certified by the Company’s Auditors, BSR & Co. vide their certificate dated September 05, 2000 of Rs.22.59 million, is as under:
Capital expenditure incurred on the proposed expansion project for second and third floors of Koramangala premises upto 31 August 2000
Purpose |
Amount paid (Rs. in million) |
Civil work |
0.15 |
8.3 TR Ductable Air conditioners |
0.63 |
DG set, AMF panel and Installation |
1.75 |
Interior work |
3.09 |
Ceiling and flooring work |
0.21 |
Networking |
2.53 |
Computer & Accessories |
10.65 |
Split air Conditioners |
0.09 |
Woodwork |
0.19 |
Analog card & telephone instruments |
0.33 |
Electrical work |
2.31 |
Electrical Transformer |
0.25 |
Fire Alarm System |
0.13 |
Furniture & Fixtures |
0.28 |
Total |
22.59 |
Sources of Finance
The expenditure incurred till August 31, 2000 on the various projects has been financed through internal accruals.
V. COMPANY AND MANAGEMENT
Brief History of the Company
The Company was incorporated by the name Aztec Software and Technology Services Private Limited as a private limited company on October 4, 1995 under the Companies Act, 1956. The Company was subsequently converted into a public company with effect from June 12, 2000 and consequently renamed Aztec Software and Technology Services Limited. The Memorandum and Articles of the Company have been amended on June 12, 2000 to record the change from private limited to public limited company, to incorporate enabling provisions for dematerialisation of the securities of the Company and to incorporate the Code of Corporate Governance. In 1996, the Company received approval from the Software Technology Parks of India, Bangalore for setting up the 100% export oriented unit under the STP Scheme of the Government of India.
Business Growth
Mr. S. Parthasarathy promoted the Company with a vision of creating a new model of a software development company. Mr. Parthasarathy is a well-known personality in IT sector, particularly for his pioneering work in hardware services. In its "garage phase", the Company functioned like many other start-ups from a converted garment factory office in Bangalore with little infrastructure and fixed assets. But even during the initial days, the Company was able to attract in its fold, some of the best database and middleware technology professionals including Debasish Chakraborty, Nirmalya Sen, Shuvankar Banerjee and KN Kumar led by current CTO, VR. Govindarajan. The initial focus was on Database and Datawarehouse internals and middleware technologies. In August 1996, V. Swaminathan joined the Company as a co-promoter. Mr. Swaminathan brought 10 years of experience of direct sales of systems and services. Gradually, the Company started developing products such as Jpact and other IP components, in addition to performing services for its customers. Since its incipient stage the Company has believed in being selective in its assignments and projects.
Since inception, the Company has targeted the American markets to develop its business, customer base and brand value. Thus in September 1997, the Company incorporated a wholly owned subsidiary Aztec Software Inc., in Santa Clara, California, USA. The said Company marketed and sold Aztec products in the world market and also developed strategic relationships with other hardware and software vendors as well as the distributors and resellers to market the products.
In last quarter of 1998, K B Chandrasekhar, the co-founder of Exodus Communications Inc. and one of the best known Indian technocrat in the Silicon Valley invested in the Company as an "Angel Investor" The subscription to shareholding came through e4e Holdings Limited (formerly known as E4e Holdings Limited), a Mauritius based OCB, which subscribed to around 63% of the Company's outstanding share capital in two tranches. Fivess also entered into a joint venture Agreement with the Company, V. Swaminathan and S. Parthasarathy. The joint venture agreement was terminated by mutual consent on May 31, 2000. This participation resulted in Mr. Chandrasekhar’s joining the Board as a Director. Consequently e4e Holdings Limited became a promoter of the Company.
With the increased experience in database and middleware Internet technologies, the Company decided to further sharpen its business and customer focus. It currently focuses on providing e-engineering solutions to the customers which include new business models on the Internet - Application Service Providers (ASPs), online exchanges and other players in B2B space. The Company is also focussing on being the co-development partner for software product/technology companies.
Capital and Regulatory History
Mr. Parthasarathy and his wife, Ms. Anuradha Parthasarathy, each subscribed to 300 shares of Rs. 10/- each for contributing to the initial share capital of the Company. In August 1996, the Company allotted 501,737 Equity Shares of Rs. 10/- each to V.Swaminathan who is a Promoter of the Company. In 1996, 1997 and 1998, the Company alloted 709,474 Equity Shares to Promoters, associates, friends and relatives of Mr. Parthasarathy and Mr. Swaminathan. In January 1999, the Company allotted 1,360,030 shares of Rs. 10/- each to e4e Holdings Ltd., a promoter of the Company. In October 1999, the Company allotted further 709,310 shares to e4e Holdings Ltd. In May 2000, the Company allotted 44,356 Shares to the associates of promoters. On January 9, 2000, the Company reduced the par value of Equity Shares from Rs. 10/- per share to Rs. 3/- per share. In September 2000 the Company has allotted 1,449,000 shares to e4e Holdings and others at the Issue price.
In November 1998, the Company formulated an Employee Stock Option Plan. In May 2000, the Company under approval from its members split the said plan into SOP'98-India and SOP'98-U.S.A. With respect to SOP'98-India, equity shares representing the options allocated of 4,493,334 were allotted to an Employees' Welfare Trust and henceforth all the outstanding options of Indian employees and consultants will be exercised through this Trust. The options pool for employees and consultants of the subsidiary company is 1,500,000. With respect to SOP'98-U.S, equity shares representing the options allocated were allotted to an Employees' Welfare Trust and henceforth all the outstanding options of U.S employees and consultants will be exercised through this Trust. Thus the outstanding options of Indian employees, U.S employees and consultants will not result in any further dilution.
The Board of the Company has passed a resolution that, post listing; all further allocations for the ESOP shall be in accordance with SEBI (Employee Stock Option Scheme and Employee Stock Purchase Scheme) Guidelines, 1999.
On June 12, 2000 the Company capitalized its General Reserve and Share Premium Account to allot 15,473,060 Bonus Equity Shares.
For further details about the Share Capital History of the Company, please refer to Notes to the Capital Structure on page [· ]
Registered Offices
The Company was incorporated in Bangalore, Karnataka, India with its Registered office at 121, Victorian Avenue, 6 'D' Main, 13th Cross, Indiranagar II Stage, Bangalore 560 038. Due to expansion in its business activities, operations and employee strength, in April 1996, the Company shifted its Registered Office to 1-A, Elgin Court, 3 Eagle Street, Richmond Town, Bangalore 560 025. In September 1997, the Company moved its Registered Office to a bigger location at 121/4, 8th Block, 8th Cross, 20 'C' Main, K.R. Gardens, Koramangala, Bangalore 560 095. With the rapid increase in business growth and employee strength, in September 1999, the Company thought it fit to again shift its Registered Office and Development center to more spacious present location. The present Registered Office is situated at #23, 3rd A Cross, 18th Main, Koramangala Block 6, Bangalore 560 095, India. The office and development center has a floor space of 15,000 square feet and is spread over 4 floors. It has the capacity to seat 300 professionals. The present Registered Office has been taken on a long term lease of 10 years beginning February 1998. The Company's Development Center is connected with a 768 KBps data link to Exodus, Santa Clara, US and from there via a T1 line (1.5 MBPS) to Aztec Software Inc.’s (a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company) office in Santa Clara. The Company is in the process of upgrading 768 KBps link to a 2 MBps link.
Main Objects of the Company
The main objects of the Company as set out in its Memorandum of Association are as follows:
The Main Objects Clause and Objects incidental or ancillary to the Main Objects Clause of the Memorandum of Association of the Company enables the Company to undertake its existing activities and the activities for which the funds are being raised, through the present Issue.
SUBSIDIARY
The Company has one wholly owned subsidiary namely Aztec Software Inc. (Aztec Software). The subsidiary is based in Santa Clara, California, USA. The Company has no subsidiaries in India.
Brief details of its wholly owned subsidiary are:
Date of Incorporation |
: |
September 22, 1997 |
Principal Business |
Marketing services for Aztec, Engineering services for Aztec and sale of list servers. |
|
Board of Directors |
: |
S. Parthasarathy |
K.B. Chandrasekhar |
||
Ownership Pattern |
: |
100% held by Aztec |
Past Financial Performance
(in USD) |
|||
Particulars |
1997-98 |
1998-99 |
1999-00 |
Sales & other Income |
Nil |
100,000 |
299,191 |
PAT |
(23,986) |
(75,650) |
(195,906) |
Share Capital |
41,000** |
50,000 |
800,000 |
Reserves & Surplus* |
(50,144) |
(306,741) |
(395,177) |
EPS(USD) |
NM |
NM |
NM |
Book Value per share (USD) |
NM |
NM |
0.11 |
* Net of Revaluation Reserves, Deferred Revenue Expenditure and Debit balance of Profit & Loss Account.
** Share Application Money
Aztec Software, a wholly owned subsidiary of Aztec, was incorporated in the State of California, USA for the purpose of increasing the sales and marketing effort of Aztec in the US. The majority of customers of Aztec are based in the US and thus the management thought it appropriate to have presence in the Silicon Valley through a wholly owned subsidiary. Aztec Software Inc. was initially conceived as an overseas joint venture, but the management then decided to incorporate a 100% subsidiary. On receipt of approval from the RBI, Aztec Software Inc. became the wholly owned subsidiary of Aztec with effect from March 31, 1999. Aztec Software Inc. has its office located at 3211, Scott Boulevard, Suite 204, Santa Clara CA 95054 USA. It is planning to open another marketing office on the East Coast of the US as well.
Aztec Software markets the products and services of Aztec to the US customers. It also owns the IPRs for Jpact, the list server developed by Aztec. Aztec Software Inc. is not engaged in any other activity apart from engaging in business development for Aztec's service offerings. Most of the senior business development officers including the promoter of Aztec, Mr. S. Parthasarathy are the employees of Aztec Software Inc. For all assignments, the development team of Aztec works seamlessly with the marketing team of Aztec Software, Inc. As on August 31, 2000, Aztec Software Inc. had 27 employees.
Revenue Sharing between Aztec and Aztec Software, Inc.
So far, for all the projects executed by Aztec, the entire income is booked in the books of account of Aztec. Aztec Software Inc. periodically debits Aztec with the cost incurred by it for and on behalf of Aztec to meet the cost of apartment rentals, payment of fees to engineering consultants who are rendering services at customer sites exclusively for Aztec.
Master Agreement with Subsidiary
With effect from April 1, 2000, the Company has entered into a Master Agreement with Aztec Software, Inc. and has appointed Aztec Software as "Service Provider". The Service Provider will be engaged in providing on-site engineering, technical and allied services to Aztec’s customers in the US. The main provisions of this agreement are:
Marketing Agreement with Subsidiary
With effect from April 1, 2000, the Company has entered into a Marketing Agreement with Aztec Software Inc. and has appointed Aztec Software as its marketing agent. Aztec Software will provide its marketing services for and on behalf of the Company in the USA for the purpose of widening the Company’s customer base in the US. The main provisions of this Agreement are:
PROMOTERS
Aztec is promoted by Mr. S. Parthasarathy, Mr. V. Swaminathan and e4e Holdings Limited, Mauritius
Mr. S. Parthasarathy (Partha)
Mr. S Parthasarathy is a Mechanical Engineer from the Indian Institute of Technology (Madras) and a PGDM from the Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad (IIMA). He has over 16 years of experience through the early stages of the Indian IT industry both as a professional and as an entrepreneur. After working with Wipro and Tata groups, Mr. Parthasarathy co-founded Computer Garage Ltd., a company engaged in computer hardware and engineering services. Partha is currently based in California, USA and heads the subsidiary of the Company.
Mr. V. Swaminathan (Sam)
Mr. V. Swaminathan is an engineer from the Indian Institute of Technology (Madras) and has a Master of Science Degree from University of Missouri, Rolla, USA. He brings over 12 years of direct sales and marketing experience in both the US and international markets. Sam previously worked with Honeywell Measurex. He has been responsible for the engineering, operations, marketing as well as worldwide sales and service business for a $6 million product line. Over a period of 8 years, he has been responsible for over US$30 million of direct sales worldwide including the European, Latin American and Asian regions for systems and services business. Sam is based in California, USA and worked as an employee of the wholly owned subsidiary of the Company till June 2000.
e4e Holdings Limited
e4e Holdings Limited (formerly known as Fivess Ventures Limited (Fivess)), a wholly owned subsidiary of e4e Inc., was incorporated in Republic of Mauritius in November 9, 1998. It is an Offshore Private Company limited by shares. Fivess was established as a wholly owned subsidiary of 5S Ventures LLC (5S), a U.S. Limited Liability Corporation. 5S is owned by Mr.K.B. Chandrasekhar, Mrs.Sukanya Chandrasekhar and their three children namely Siddharth Chandrasekhar, Sandeep Chandrasekhar and Suraj Chandrasekhar. 5S was both an investment, business management vehicle and estate planning vehicle for the Chandrasekhar family. Fivess was intended to hold, coordinate and manage the India operations of 5S.
On April 21, 2000 the ownership of Fivess was transferred to e4e Inc. (e4e), a US corporation incorporated under Delaware laws. Fivess was subsequently renamed as e4e Holdings Limited. e4e intends to use e4e Holdings for the broad business purposes related to e4e’s India operations. e4e Inc. intends to own and operate a limited number of synergistic services companies and incubate external and internal ideas. The Company also intends to provide value to its portfolio companies by bringing them new customers / revenue and leading them to emerging opportunities. Mr. K.B. Chandrasekhar, a director of the Aztec, is the non-executive Chairman of e4e. Mr. Somshankar Das, a director of Aztec, is the President and CEO and a director of e4e. The Board of Directors of e4e comprises of:
1. |
K.B. Chandrasekhar |
2. |
Somshankar Das |
3. |
Bill Melton |
4. |
Lip Bu tan |
5. |
Sridhar Mitta |
As of date there are no natural persons, who are shareholders of e4e Holdings. e4e Holdings also has a 100% India based subsidiary called e4e Labs Private Limited, Bangalore.
The other details about e4e Holdings Limited are:
Board of Directors |
Mr.K.B.Chandrasekhar |
Mr.Lalitha Anundee |
|
Mr.Lee Kwee Tai Tsang Chung |
|
Ownership Pattern |
100% owned by e4e Inc. |
Past Financial Performance:
In USD
Particulars |
Year ended December 31, 1998 |
Year ended December 31, 1999 |
Sales & Other Income |
389 |
465 |
PAT |
(3,471) |
(6,502) |
Equity Capital |
1,000,002 |
1,000,002 |
Reserves* |
(3,471) |
(9,973) |
EPS |
NM |
NM |
Book Value (USD) |
0.99 |
0.99 |
* Net of revaluation reserves and miscellaneous expenditure not written off
Promoter Shareholding
The shareholding of Promoters are as under:
Name |
No. of Shares |
% of pre- Issue capital |
e4e Holdings Limited |
15,627,280 |
46.10 |
S. Parthasarathy |
4,879,000 |
14.39 |
V. Swaminathan |
2,018,786 |
5.96 |
FOUNDER EMPLOYEES
The Company has five founder employees who have driven the growth of the Company’s business operations. These employees have contributed to the Company’s promotion and activities through their diverse experience and sound technical skill set. The founder employees of the Company are:
These employees do not own any shares in the Company but have been granted and vested with certain stock options under the Company’s Stock Option Plan. These employees have offered 721,669 (20% of their total stock options) options to be locked-in for a period of three years from the date of listing of the Company’s Equity on the Regional Stock Exchange. Thus 721,669 Shares allotted to the Employee Welfare Trust would be locked in for a period of three years. The Employee Welfare Trust will monitor the lock-in.
Group Companies and Other Ventures of the Promoter
Following are the other companies / ventures promoted by the same promoters:
e4e Labs Private Limited
Date of Incorporation |
April 20, 2000 |
Principal Business |
To help entrepreneurs to set enterprises in the area of Internet applications |
Board of Directors |
Dr. Sridhar Mitta |
Mr. Somshankar Das |
|
Mr. S. R. Gopalan |
|
Ownership Pattern |
100% owned by e4e Holdings Limited |
Since the Company has recently being incorporated, it is yet to start its business operations.
Related Party Transactions
There have been no related party transactions between the Company, its subsidiaries and other companies/ventures promoted by the same promoters or companies in which Promoters/Directors are interested during the period April 1, 1999 through March 31, 2000 except for the following:
Name of the Party |
Nature of relationship |
Subject matter of contract |
Expenditure /Income |
Amount (Rs. in million) |
M. Chandrasekaran |
Director |
Professional fees |
Expenditure |
0.25 |
Aztec Software Inc. |
Wholly Owned Subsidiary |
Professional charges and travel related expenses |
Expenditure |
9.31 |
Jam Cracker Inc. (formerly known as Vital Tone Inc.) |
A company in which Mr. K. B. Chandrasekhar, Director is interested |
Software Development Services |
Income |
45.60 |
There have been no related party transactions between the Company, its subsidiaries and other companies/ventures promoted by the same promoters or companies in which Promoters/Directors are interested during the period April 1, 2000 through June 30, 2000 except for the following:
Name of the Party |
Nature of relationship |
Subject matter of contract |
Expenditure /Income |
Amount (Rs. in million) |
Jam Cracker Inc. (formerly known as Vital Tone inc) |
A company in which Mr K. B. Chandrasekhar, Director is interested |
Software Development Services |
Income |
47.67 |
Reez.Com |
A company in which Mr K. B. Chandrasekhar, Director is interested |
Software Development Services |
Income |
8.21 |
Aztec Software Inc. |
Wholly Owned Subsidiary |
Consultancy Charges – On site |
Expenditure |
20.62 |
Aztec Software Inc. |
Wholly Owned Subsidiary |
Agency Commission |
Expenditure |
16.86 |
Aztec Software Inc. |
Wholly Owned Subsidiary |
Accommodation expenses payable |
Expenditure |
3.12 |
Aztec Software Inc. |
Wholly Owned Subsidiary |
Travel related expenses receivable |
Expenditure |
1.76 |
Aztec Software and Technology Services Private Limited Employees Welfare Trust. |
A Trust formed for the administration and implementation of the Company’s 1998 Stock Options Plan (India) |
Interest Free Loan |
- |
13.39 |
Common Pursuits
None of the Group Companies or other ventures of the Promoters are engaged in the same line of business as that of the Company.
MANAGEMENT
The Company is managed by the Board of Directors under the Chairmanship of Mr. S. Parthasarathy. The composition of the Board of Directors is as below:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Name, Designation, Address & Occupation |
Other Directorships |
S. Parthasarathy |
Aztec Software Inc., USA |
S/o Sundararajan |
|
Age: 41 years |
|
Chairman |
|
Address |
|
20995 Pepper Tree Lane |
|
Cupertino, CA 95014 |
|
USA |
|
Occupation: Technocrat |
|
K. B. Chandrasekhar |
Chairman |
S/o G. Balakrishnan |
e4e Inc., USA |
Age: 40 Years |
Jamcracker Inc., USA |
Director |
Director |
21591, Regnart Road |
VARStreet.com, USA |
Cupertino, CA 95014 |
IPWireless Inc., USA |
USA |
e4e Holdings Limited, Mauritius |
Occupation: Angel Investor |
Reez.com Corporation, USA |
Aztec Software Inc., USA |
|
M. Chandrasekaran |
Impulse Soft Private Ltd. |
S/o V. H. Mahadevan |
EAI Technologies Private Ltd. |
Age: 51 years |
|
Director |
|
28/2, 5th Main, Chamarajpet, |
|
Bangalore 560 018 |
|
Occupation: Management Advisor |
|
Sunil Gulati |
Nil |
S/o Dr. Satya Pal Gulati |
|
Age: 41 years |
|
Director |
|
201, Silver Arch, 66, Napean Sea Road, |
|
Mumbai 400 006 |
|
Occupation: Banker |
|
Somshankar Das |
Director |
S/o Rameswar Das |
WebEx, USA |
Age: 50 years |
e4e Inc., USA |
Director |
e4e Labs Private Limited |
1864, Fallen Leaf Lane, Los Altos, |
|
CA 94024 |
|
USA |
|
Occupation: Venture Capitalist |
Brief Background of Directors
K.B. Chandrasekhar (Chandra)
The Co-founder and ex-Chairman of Exodus Communications Inc., an Internet services organization, and a leading server hosting company for mission critical Internet sites. Chandra began his career in 1983 at Wipro, as a customer support engineer. Over his seven years with the company, he advanced through various sales, marketing and support functions. In 1990 he moved to the US as country manager for Rolta India Ltd.
In 1992 Chandra set out on his own and founded Fouress, Inc. Fouress was a network software design and development firm, and its clients included Sun Microsystems, Adaptec, Toshiba, and Lockheed. In 1994, Chandra founded Exodus Communications. The company went public in March 1998 in one of the most successful US IPOs of 1998. In 1999 Chandra was honored as the Ernst & Young Northern California Entrepreneur of the Year. In 2000, Chandra co-founded e4e Inc.
Chandra is an engineering graduate from Madras Institute of Technology
M. Chandrasekaran
Chandrasekaran has more than 25 years international experience in Finance, Strategic Planning, Marketing and senior General Management positions. Chandrasekaran works as a Management Consultant. Chandrasekaran is also a Director of EAI Technologies Private Ltd. and Impulse Software Private Ltd. He is also an advisor to the Managing Director of Silicon Automation Systems Ltd. He was a director of Aditi Technologies Private Ltd., a successful provider of high-end technical consulting and mentoring services to Microsoft and other global computer software majors.
Chandrasekaran is an engineering graduate from the University of Madras and received a PGDM from the Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad.
S. Parthasarathy
Partha has over 16 years of experience through the early stages of the Indian IT industry, both as a professional and as an entrepreneur. After having worked with the TATA and WIPRO groups in the early years, Partha founded Computer Garage Ltd., India's leading independent hardware and engineering services company. Partha is no longer associated with Computer Garage. He is known for his pioneering work in hardware services. Aztec is his second entrepreneurial venture in the IT industry. Partha is currently based in the US and works as an employee of Aztec Software Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company as well as the President and CEO of the global operations of the Company. He also worked as the Managing Director of the Company from January 1999 to April 2000.
Partha is an engineering graduate from the Indian Institute of Technology, Madras and received a PGDM from the Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad.
Sunil Gulati
Sunil Gulati heads the Bank of America’s investment banking efforts in India. Prior to this assignment commencing 1997, Sunil was based in Hong Kong for over 5 years with primary responsibilities for the bank’s investment banking activities in North Asia. He also handled strategic and corporate M&A exercises for the Bank throughout the Asia-Pacific Region, including the divestment of the bank’s subsidiaries and branches in Malaysia, Thailand and Australia.
Sunil has been actively involved in the technology sector in India, and has senior level relationships with major players in the industry and financial institutions and FIIs. Sunil has been actively involved with several clients in the technology sector including Wipronet, Mahindra British Telecom, Aptech, Bharti, BPL, etc.
Prior to joining the Bank of America in 1989, Sunil worked with Standard Chartered Merchant Bank and with the management consultancy division of A.F. Ferguson & Co. in India. He received a PGDM from the Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad in 1984 and B.Tech. (Electronics) from the Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi in 1982.
Somshankar Das
Somshankar Das (Som) is a co-founder and the President and CEO of e4e Inc, a technology financing and holding company focused on building a portfolio of Internet technology based infrastructure companies providing outsourced services to corporate customers in the New Economy.
Prior to co-founding e4e Inc, Mr. Das was a General Partner of the Walden International Investment Group (" WIIG "), an international venture capital firm with operations in the USA and in Asia, including India. In that capacity, Mr. Das co-founded the India operations of WIIG. At WIIG, Mr. Das specialized in the semiconductor, software, IT service and Internet infrastructure industries. He has over twelve years of management experience in the US semiconductor industry. Mr. Das is currently a director of WebEx. Prior to joining WIIG, Mr. Das was Director for Worldwide Business Development at VLSI Technology, Inc.
Previously, he was an officer of the Indian Administrative Service for over 11 years. As Director for Industries in Mumbai, he was involved in promoting inward investments and facilitating the implementation of industrial projects in Maharashtra State. Mr. Das holds an MBA from Stanford University and a Master of Science Degree in Physics and Mathematics from Calcutta University.
Corporate Governance
In accordance with the Code of Corporate Governance of the SEBI and other pronouncements/ requirements of SEBI and the listing requirements of the Stock Exchanges, the Board of the Company has constituted three standing Committees: (1) Audit Committee; (2) Compensation Committee and (3) Investor Grievance Committee. The Board in its meeting held on May 3, 2000 has accepted the Code of Corporate Governance, as issued by SEBI in full and the Articles of the Company have been modified accordingly.
The Audit Committee will be chiefly responsible for oversight of the Company’s financial reporting process and the disclosure of its financial information to ensure that the financial statement is correct, sufficient and credible; recommending the appointment and removal of external auditor, fixation of audit fee and also approval for payment for any other services and reviewing with management the annual financial statements before submission to the Board.
The Compensation Committee will establish remuneration levels for certain of the Company's officers, perform such functions as provided under the employee benefit programs and administer Stock Option Plan.
The Investor Grievance Committee will specifically look into the redressing of shareholder and investors complaints like transfer of shares, non-receipt of balance sheet, non-receipt of declared dividends etc
Members of the Board Committees
The present members of the various Board Committees are:
Manager
The Board at its meeting held on May 3, 2000 has appointed Mr. B.G. Balakrishna, President and Chief Executive Officer – Indian Operations, as Manager within the meaning of Section 269 of the Act for a period of two years beginning from May 3, 2000. As the Manager, Mr. Balakrishna shall be responsible for the overall supervision of the functioning of the Company, handling the day to day affairs of the Company, appointment and termination of the employees, operating the bank accounts of the Company, signing cheques and other such functions as specified in the Articles of the Company. Manager shall report to the Board on the activities of the Company and shall also perform all other duties that the Board may delegate to the Manager from time to time.
Interest of / Benefits to / Litigation of the Promoters and Directors
Except to the extent of shares acquired by the Promoters and Directors they did not have any other interest in the promotion of the Company.
In 1996-97, the Company purchased certain Intellectual Property Rights for a consideration of Rs. 77 lakh from Mr. S. Parthasarathy, a Promoter and a Director of the Company. Mr. Parthasarathy is also entitled to a remuneration of USD 150,000 in his capacity as an employee of Aztec Software Inc., a subsidiary of the Company. In 1998-99, the Company paid Rs. 3.31 lakh and in 1999-2000 Rs. 2.46 lakh to Mr. M. Chandrasekaran, a Director of the Company towards consultancy fees.
There has been no pending litigations against/with the Directors or proceedings initiated against them for economic offences.
Organizational Structure
The Organization structure of Aztec Group is:
KEY MANAGERIAL PERSONNEL
Details of the Key Managerial Personnel of the Company are as follows:
B.G. Balakrishnan, 54 years
President & CEO – India Operations
BGB, as he is known, has over 30 years of industry experience, of which 17 years is in the IT industry. BGB is very well known in the industry, and his most recent assignment has been with Sivan Securities, where he has been responsible for mentoring some of the software companies funded by Sivan. From 1997 to 1999, BGB was the CEO of Raffles Software, a company promoted by Thakral Group, Singapore.
From 1992-97, BGB was the Chief Operating Officer of BFL Software. As part of the start-up team of BFL Software, BGB was responsible for strategic planning, business development and organizational growth. Prior to BFL, BGB was with Tata Elxsi (91-92) and Wipro Ltd. (84-91). At Wipro, BGB was General Manager of the Exports Division prior to which he was Head of the Southern Region Operations.
BGB is an engineering graduate and he joined Aztec in March 2000.
Govindarajan V.R., 40 years
Chief Technology Officer
An MS in Computer Science from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Govindarajan has more than 14 years of experience in the software industry in the US and in India. Govindarajan started his career and became a key member of a distributed database product development group at Digital Equipment Corporation (USA). Subsequently, he worked with Tata-IBM in Bangalore, India. His most recent assignment was with the IBM Almaden Research Center in developing a transparent, tight integration of a DBMS with external object servers, a widely acclaimed, patent-pending technology that enables the building of enterprise Internet applications with access to legacy data. He joined Aztec in June 1996.
Srikanth Karra, 37 years
General Manager- Human Resources
An MA from TISS, Bombay and a Bachelor’s degree in General Law, Srikanth brings in more than 13 years of experience in Human Resource. He started his career in 1987 at Bluestar Limited, Bombay after which he moved on to ITC Limited in 1990 and was with them for over 9 year. He joined Aztec in March 1999.
As Assistant Manager HR in ITC Head Office, he was responsible for performance Management systems and introducing computerisation of manpower databases. In his stint in the factories he has brought about improvements in manpower productivity through various innovative practices in Human Resources Management and Industrial relations. Some notable HR practices were, reconfiguring the shop floor into self-managed teams, Team Based Incentives and Communications. He led the HR team in negotiating the movement of the Bangalore factory to a new location in the outskirts. This involved negotiating and agreeing to an entirely new set of terms and work practices apart from physical relocation of 2000 people. At ANZ Grindlays he was responsible for Training and Development apart from other HR functions. He was also responsible for the Downsizing exercise for the Eastern Region during 1994.
Muralikrishnan A.G, 39 years
Chief Financial Officer
Muralikrishnan holds a Bachelors Degree in Science from Madras University and qualified as a Chartered Accountant in January 1987. Murali is currently a Fellow Member of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, New Delhi.
Prior to joining Aztec in April 2000 as its CFO, Murali was a partner in M/s. S.Madhavan & Co. Chartered Accountants, Bangalore from September 1989. In the said capacity he has handled audits of a wide range of corporate enterprises. His specialization has been in the field of Corporate Taxation, Finance, and Foreign Exchange Regulations. In the recent past he has helped a number of start-up companies in India in the Information Technology sector offering an array of services under one roof.
In addition to being the CFO of Aztec, Murali serves as a non-executive director on the Board of vEngines India Private Limited – a VLSI Design house and a wholly owned subsidiary of vEngines, Inc. and Anglian Water International Private Limited – a wholly owned subsidiary of Anglian Water Plc, U.K.
Ashish Dey, 37 years
General Manager – Projects
Ashish joined Aztec team in January 1999. An M.Tech. in Computer Science from the Indian Institute of Technology (Kharagpur), Ashish has over 12 years of experience in software development and engineering in the US and in India. Ashish began his career at Wipro Systems (India), where he was a key member of their Software Research and Development Group.
Subsequently, as a Software Specialist with IBM (India), Ashish worked at IBM Lab at Boca Raton, Austin on a variety of projects involving IBM Micro kernel (Virtual Memory, External Memory Manager, Default Pager, etc.) and AIX Operating System. Ashish worked as Chief Engineer in a team of 35 people for "Java Beans Around the World project" for over 1.9 years. During this period, he was the key architect for the development of XML beans like - XML Viewer Beans, XML Editor beans, XML Search and Filter beans, XML Tokenizer beans, XML DOM Generator beans and File Generator beans. Ashish’s work also involves development of non-XML beans in domains like- Networking, Project Management, Masking, Image Processing and Image Conversion.
Debasish Chakraborty (Dchak), 38 years
Founder Architect
An M.Tech. in Computer Science from Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, Dchak has more than 12 years' experience in the software industry in the US and in India. Dchak was a key member of the FORTRAN Compiler Group in Wipro InfoTech Ltd. He took lead role in the architecture, design and implementation of the FORTRAN 77 compiler back-end (code generator cum optimizer) for the Intel ix86 and Motorola Mc680x0 UNIX-based platforms. He also took part in the development of a COMMON LISP interpreter and a compiler optimizer test suite.
As a Software Specialist with Tata-IBM, Bangalore, India, he has worked with several IBM Labs on various projects.
After joining Aztec in April 1997, Dchak worked on the architecture and development of Jpactä , the complete solution for Internet List Marketers
Subbu Subramaniam, 39 years
General Manager - Projects
Subbu has worked in all areas of the software product life cycle as part of bigger companies like Hewlett Packard/IBM as well as smaller companies like Verifone / Synon before joining Aztec in December 1998. The technology areas that he has worked in the past include X11 Server internals and Client libraries, proprietary graphics solutions in the areas of CAD/CAM, AIX internals as well as layered services. The application areas include back ends on Unix/NT for CASE tools at Synon Inc, Decision Support Systems at Indian Institute of Management (Ahmedabad, India) and Payment Transaction Processing systems while at Verifone. He also leverages project management skills acquired while executing multi-location projects at HP, IBM and Verifone.
He has an honour’s Degree in Mechanical Engineering from the Regional Engineering College, Trichy and a Management Diploma from the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore. His current interest is in the value proposition that XML and Java can provide to an enterprise solution, product or standard.
Vasudevan Comandur (Vasu), 40 years
General Manager - Projects
An M.E. in Electrical Engineering from the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Vasu has more than 15 years' experience in the software industry in the US, Latin America and India prior to his joining the Aztec team in January, 2000.
Vasu began his career with Tata Burroughs Ltd. (Presently called Tata Infotech Ltd.) as a software trainee and moved up to the level of specialist within a short time. During his association with the Tatas, he had the opportunity to work with several Burroughs subsidiaries based in USA and Latin America. Some of the project highlights are:
Part of the team involved in developing a Terminal named (T27) capable of handling multiple sessions with Burroughs Mainframe using Burroughs Poll/Select protocol, SNA gateway over X.25 on Burroughs micro computer and developed Interrupt Service Routine (ISR) for a serial port for sending/receiving SNA packets.
As a networking consultant for the entire Latin American region, was involved in connecting Burroughs Financial application called (FINESSE) to CICS applications running on IBM mainframes and also helped the sales/marketing people to win contracts worth USD 2 Million by connecting Burroughs financial applications with IBM’s S/36, S/38 & AS/400.
Chief architect for a product that enabled Tuxedo clients to initiate transactions with Legacy applications using LU 6.2 protocol.
As part of the senior management team of Trigent Software Ltd., Vasu was involved in managing projects for various consulting and product companies like Intersolv, CTP, CSC and Axent Technologies. Other activities he carried out at Trigent were streamlining the delivery process for the customer deliverables and initiated the product idea for printing files to remote locations over the web (Seamless printing over the web)
A. Balakrishnan, 40 years
General Manager - Technical Services
A Mechanical Engineering graduate from KREC, Suratkal and a PGDIE from National Institute for Training in Industrial Engineering (NITIE), Bombay, Bala has over 16 years of diverse experience in the IT industry.
Bala started his career in HMT as a software developer and was involved in designing and developing applications for the Materials Management function.
Later he joined Wipro and was with them for eleven years in different functions including software development, software support, product management, sales and business development in the domestic and international market. He was initially responsible for developing shrink-wrapped applications like Inventory, Payroll and Personnel Information Systems on Unix, Unify and C. After a training with Sun Microsystems, he set-up the software support group for Sun Workstations in Wipro. He along with the marketing team was responsible for securing the first breakthrough order for Sun Microsystems in India. He was later involved in the product management for CASE Tools, AI tools and E-Publishing tools. He was instrumental in forging relationships with overseas technical partners for products like Teamwork, Interleaf, etc. He was also responsible for marketing these products. He spent considerable time in the erstwhile USSR selling CAD/CAM solutions and SUN Workstations. He also trained the dealer network of Wipro in the USSR to sell these solutions. In his next assignment, he headed the southern region for sales of CAD/CAM solutions and workstations. Then he moved to the US to head the East Coast operations of Wipro Systems for software services. The software operations saw substantial growth during his tenure.
Subsequently he joined Subex Systems and was responsible for setting up their US operations and getting their initial breakthroughs for offshore projects. He set-up the branch office in Atlanta and also played a major role in the acquisition of a company in the US and integrating the same with the parent company.
In Aztec, as GM, Technical Services, he is responsible for all operations including Resource Management, System Administration, MIS and Marketing Support. Bala joined Aztec in June 2000.
Vidyut Shenoy, 42 years
Director – Aztec Learning Center
Vidyut joined Aztec in May 2000 and is responsible for setting up Aztec Learning Center.
An Electrical Engineering graduate of the University of Mumbai, and a PGDM from Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta, Vidyut has over 18 years of diverse experience in the IT industry. His first assignment upon graduation in engineering was with Patni Computer Systems (PCS) in Mumbai. He was a member of the team that worked on the first entirely on-line project in India to develop a commercial software package called CAMP. He left PCS to obtain a PGDM from IIM Calcutta.
Upon graduation from IIM, Vidyut joined Wipro Infotech at Mumbai, in the customer support function. He led teams of support executives that provided technical assistance to Wipro’s large customers such as Bombay Dyeing, Glaxo, SBI and ONGC. Subsequent to this assignment, Vidyut moved as Territory Manager for Wipro in Pune, where he managed sales of technical systems to large accounts such as Telco and Bajaj Auto. He grew the market for these products.
Vidyut then moved on to Motorola. He worked at Bangalore, USA and Singapore. His first assignment was to manage Software Resources for Motorola India. He was architect of the MIEL development process, and developed a road map that planned, selected and deployed development tools at Motorola India. His team was responsible for all technical training, as also the induction of new employees. He replicated the same processes at other software centers of Motorola at Beijing, Adelaide and Singapore. He was part of the global team that helped to design a global system called TAS that managed the administration of training. He has helped to create, deploy and revise a number of technical courses. He is certified by Motorola University to teach many of their courses. He has delivered these courses in 9 countries.
Ritu Sharma, 39 years
Director - Quality Assurance
An Electronics and Electrical Engineering graduate from BITS, Pilani, Ritu has 16 years of diverse experience in the IT industry.
Ritu started her career in TCS as a systems analyst and was with them for over six years. Here she was involved in designing and developing applications in the areas of Banking, Real Estate Brokerage and Merchandising for customers based in USA, Australia, Switzerland and Netherlands.
Later she joined Price Waterhouse, Jamaica and was with them for five years. Here she managed several software development projects in the areas of Mortgage Accounting, Share Issue and Share Registrations. She also did consulting for a Canadian Bank to automate their Share Registration function and for a Jamaican merchandising firm to automate their various functions such as purchasing and distribution.
Subsequently she joined Tata Infotech Ltd where she worked in their Sign Bank product group in the capacity of a Development, Support and Process Manager. As development manager she developed and implemented Sign Bank product on several hardware platforms. As support manager she supported a large customer base in USA and South America. As process manager she was involved in defining and implementing processes to ensure streamlining of various activities, increasing productivity and customer satisfaction.
After having a short stint in Wipro where she managed several projects for a US based Investment Services firm she moved on to Trigent Software Ltd to head their Quality function. Here she was involved in making the QA processes more efficient and effective. She started the drive for metrics collection and analysis and based on this improved several areas of functioning. She was instrumental in getting no non-conformances in their periodic external audit and taking the company through an ISO9000-3 (Tick-IT) re-certification audit. She coordinated activities related to automation within the company and initiated the knowledge management drive by defining and implementing processes for the same.
In Aztec, as Director, Quality Assurance, she is responsible for ensuring Quality within all the projects and support functions. Ritu joined Aztec in August 2000.
Noel Almeida, 35 Years
Director - Projects
An M.Sc. in Computer Science, from the University of Bombay, Noel has more than 9 years of experience in the software industry in the US, Germany and India.
Noel started his career doing in-house application development for Hoechst India Ltd. He then worked at IIT Bombay as a key member of the team designing and developing an Aircraft Maintenance Training Simulator. The product developed at IIT is still used by the Indian Air Force.
As a Systems Analyst at Think Systems Pvt. Ltd., Bombay, he was responsible for the design and development of the backend for a Decision Support System for Trade Promotions. This product, designed in collaboration with a leading FMCG corporation in the US, made extensive use of a proprietary un-normalized representation of data to allow multi-dimension views of data to different levels of granularity.
As a Senior Technical Executive with IBM Global Systems Ltd., Bangalore, Noel was involved in the design and delivery of advanced technical courses in the areas of TCP/IP networking, Object-oriented programming and design, and Unix programming, and won awards for the same. While at IBM, he was solely responsible for the implementation of the IBM Authorized Centres for Education throughout India, a task which involved formulating the curriculum, getting it developed through IIT Kanpur, the selection and training of instructors, the production of courseware, and the infrastructure development for the centers.
Prior to joining Aztec, Noel was Assistant Vice President – Technical Marketing, InterCope (India) Pvt. Ltd. At InterCope he held responsibilities for projects in the areas of E-Commerce, the definition of all processes for ISO-9000, technical training, and technical sales and marketing. He started and technically led the E-Commerce effort at InterCope. His previous responsibilities at InterCope included lead design and project management for the following projects:
After joining Aztec in May 2000, Noel has been involved in the detailed design and project management of a portal aimed at linking Supply and Demand Chains.
Rudreshwar Sen, 33 years
Director - Projects
An M.Sc. and M.Phil. from the University of Delhi, Rudreshwar has close to 10 years of work experience in the IT industry. Rudreshwar started his career as a Software Engineer with Cegelec India in October 1990. Rudreshwar moved to IBM Global services in 1992. At IBM, he handled a variety of responsibilities, varying from software development to business development. Rudreshwar was also responsible for managing personal growth, skill development, performance evaluation, and compensation for over 120 people at IBM. Rudreshwar joined Aztec team in April 2000.
Shankar Chandrasekhar, 35 years
Director - Projects
An MCA from the University of Baroda, Shankar has over 11 years of work experience in Project Management, Applications Design and Development. Shankar started his career with Wipro Systems, Bangalore in 1989, where he handled a variety of responsibilities, ranging from customer support to Application development to project management. In 1995, he went across to the US, where he worked for five years. During his stay in the US, Shankar was mainly involved in business analysis, data modeling and project management. Shankar joined Aztec in April 2000.
Shuvankar Banerjee, 29 years
Director - Projects
An Engineer from BITS Pilani, Shuvankar has over six years of work experience in the IT industry, in India and in the US. Shuvankar started his career with Tata-IBM in Bangalore, where he worked on many software projects, including a one-year stint at IBM’s T.J.Watson Research Lab. Shuvankar joined Aztec in August 1996, where he was among the Founder members. Starting as a Project lead, Shuvankar has moved up and is currently a Director of Projects. Some of the projects Shuvankar has worked on in various capacities are:
Tarun Krishnamurthy, 29 years
Director - Projects
An MS in Computer Science from the University of South Dakota, USA, Tarun has close to 8 years experience in the IT industry. Tarun started his career with Sonata Software, Bangalore, in 1992. After working for a year with Sonata, he went across to the US for his Master’s.
After his post graduation, Tarun worked with Open Environment Corporation (Borland Corporation, since November 1996), for a year and a half, where he was responsible for the maintenance of NetMinder, an Application management tool. Between 1996 and 1998, Tarun worked with Borland International in Sydney, Australia, where he was responsible for the design and development of AppCenter, a product that facilitates management and deployment of mission critical multi-tiered applications in a heterogeneous distributed environment. Tarun got back to the US in 1998, where he worked with Inprise Corporation as a Senior Software Development Engineer. At Inprise, Tarun was involved in the design and development of Enterprise Information Server (EIS), a product that would ease integration, synchronization and exchange of data stored across many disparate business systems using business rules and multiple data adapters. Before joining Aztec in May 2000, Tarun was working with Aspect Development, Bangalore, where he was responsible for the design and development of a Workflow Manager.
All the employees named above are on the rolls of the Company as Permanent employees.
Key Mangerial Personnel of the Subsidiary
The wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, Aztec Software Inc., is engaged in engineering and marketing activities for the Company on commission basis. Some of the key managerial personnel of Aztec Software Inc. are:
Richard Crisman (Dick), 52 years
Vice President, Sales & Business Development.
Dick heads the worldwide sales and alliances efforts of Aztec Inc. Dick brings over 25 years of experience in high technology sales and consulting to Aztec. Included in that experience are positions in consulting, sales, business development, and sales and executive management. Dick has held positions with Digital Equipment, Price Waterhouse, Control Data, and Ascent Logic, a pre-IPO startup, where he was Vice President of Field Operations. Prior to joining Aztec, Dick's most recent assignment was on the executive management team at Streamnet Collaboration Systems where he assisted in the launch of a peer-to-peer collaboration service over the Internet. Dick received a BA and MBA from Boise State University. He joined Aztec Software Inc. in July 2000.
Ashok Krishnamoorthy, 42 years
Vice President - West Coast
An Engineer from Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra and a PGDM from IIM, Ahmedabad, Ashok has over 15 years of professional experience in the Information Technology industry, initially in the sales and business development functions and later as Profit Center head and Divisional Head. Ashok started his career in 1984 at Wipro Limited. He was with Microland for more than 6 years and was responsible for establishing and managing the software division of Microland. He joined Aztec team in June 1999.
Chinni Kommi, 42 years
Vice President - Engineering
Chinni has over 18 years of experience in networking, middleware, database connectivity, and Internet server software development. Prior to joining Aztec, Chinni was with Optimal Networks Inc., California, a web measurement and diagnostic services company where he was running their engineering organization. Prior to Optimal, Chinni worked with Sybase, Inc., California, where he was responsible for its highly successful Jaguar (Internet application server) group. He has an extensive background in middleware technologies, operating systems, transaction servers and TCP/IP based communication technologies. Chinni has significant experience in managing large distributed groups dealing with multiple products. He has an MS and Postgraduate degree in Mathematics and Computer Science. Chinni joined Aztec team in July 2000.
Kumar K.N, 33 years
Project Manager
An M.Tech. in Computer Science from the Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, Kumar has over eight years’ work experience in the IT industry. Kumar started his career with the Indian Institute of Science in Bangalore, where he worked on developing and implementing knowledge representation systems and a natural language interface for a database system as part of requirements for a client project. After his post-graduation, Kumar worked for a year with Central Research Laboratory before joining Hewlett–Packard India Software Operations, where he was involved in a number of database related projects. Kumar is a founder member of Aztec. At Aztec Kumar has worked extensively with the Microsoft SQL Server team. Some of the work he has done is as follows:
Kumar joined Aztec team in February 1997.
Nirmalya Sen, 29 years
Founder Architect Product Engineering
A B. Tech. from the Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, Nirmalya has been associated with the software industry in India and the US for over six years.
Before joining Aztec in January 1997, he worked for Tata-IBM, India. He spent two years at IBM labs in Toronto and Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, working on system management products TT/6000 and SDPM. He was a member of the Communication Server for OS/2 Team, working on sub-system management modules.
At Aztec, he has led a team that developed a complete suite of GUI controls in Java. He had been a key architect for Jpact. He also has led and currently leads major efforts for industrial strength e-commerce solutions ranging from system monitoring, data merchandising to IT infrastructure management. His areas of interest include OOAD and distributed processing. Making industry strength, robust, scalable, high-performing e-commerce solutions is his passion these days.
S.Raghuram, 41 years
Director -Technology
An MS in Computer Science from Univ. of Massachusetts at Amherst, and ME in Automation from IISc, Bangalore, Raghuram has more than 12 years of software industry experience and 4 years of research experience in the US.
Raghuram’s career began in India at ITI Ltd. where he worked on OS for mobile telephone exchanges. At Tandem Computers in US, he was a key member of the maintenance and diagnostic subsystem, a core component of Guardian operating system. He conceived, architected and led a team that developed remote maintenance software to do lights off management of systems from data centers.
As a staff software engineer at Sybase, Raghuram was the principal architect and project lead of 20+ team that delivered the new Companion Cluster Architecture for High Availability in ASE 12.0 release. This new HA architecture that had many first-in-the-industry features was conceived by him and he led the complete lifecycle of this product till the first maintenance release. As part of this project, he personally developed the database mount/unmount and failover/failback facility that was new in the industry, and also conceived and architected many of the features in this architecture, such as page flush time stamps (PFTS) etc. Before this project, he architected, developed and delivered several industry innovative features, such as RFI (recovery fault isolation) that enables the database to isolate a corrupt part of the database and still bring the rest online. He also managed a team of engineers that owned the recovery part of the database server and also was the architect to extend the high availability to entire enterprise portal (EP) that included the database server, application server (EAS), etc.
As a doctoral candidate in Univ. of Massachusetts, Raghuram did research in the intersimulation of interconnection networks, concurrency control in object databases, and object oriented OS. Raghuram has published and presented in many reputed conferences such as SIGMOD, ICDE, and ISUG. Raghuram joined Aztec in March 2000.
Krishna Kumar S., 30 years
Director - Projects
S. Krishna Kumar has over 7 years of experience in the field of information technology. He has an MCA from Karnataka Regional Engineering College, Surathkal. At Aztec he is the Project Manager responsible for Aztec’s engagement with their customer, Asera Inc. Before this he was responsible for the List Marketing Solutions built on Jpact, Aztec’s Application He was also responsible for designing SSL support in the Jpact product. He joined Aztec Team in August 1998.
Murugavel Selvan, 35 years
Director -Technology
A BE from REC, Trichy and an MS from Arizona State University, Selvan has over 11 years of experience in the IT industry. Prior to joining Aztec, he was Engineering Manager at Intellicorp, CA. Intellicorp is a leading provider of eBusiness and CRM solutions for the SAP community. Some of the technology areas that he has worked on are Object Oriented Development tools, Data Access technologies where he converted SAP reference model to Object Databases, integration technologies for the mysap.com website, an Internet Pricing Configurator which involved hooking up the Sales Configurator and Internet Pricing Engines developed in Java, and building a Distributed Business Navigator Web product which allowed users to view different diagram representations (EventProcessChain diagrams etc.) over the web. Selvan is involved in assisting and guiding the Aztec project teams in the US, as also in assisting the sales team in pre-sales technical consulting. Selvan joined Aztec in March 2000.
Changes in Key Managerial Personnel in last three years:
Following are the changes in Key Managerial Personnel in last three years:
1997-98
Name |
Designation |
Reason |
Debasish Chakraborty |
Senior Architect |
Joined |
1998-99
Name |
Designation |
Reason |
Ashish Kumar Dey |
General Manager –Projects |
Joined |
Subbu Subramaniam |
General Manager – Projects |
Joined |
Srikanth Karra |
Vice President – Human Resources |
Joined |
1999-2000
Name |
Designation |
Reason |
Vasudevan Comandur |
General Manager- Projects |
Joined |
Balakrishnan B G |
President and CEO |
Joined |
Krishna Kumar S. |
Director – Projects |
Relocated to Subsidiary |
FY 2000 – Till date
Name |
Designation |
Reason |
A.G. Muralikrishnan |
Chief Financial Officer |
Joined |
Vidyut Shenoy |
Director – Aztec Learning Center |
Joined |
K.N. Kumar |
Project Manager |
Relocated to Subsidiary |
A. Balakrishnan |
General Manager – Technical Services |
Joined |
Nirmalaya Sen |
Founder Architect – Product Engineering |
Relocated to Subsidiary |
Ritu Sharma |
Director – Quality Assurance |
Joined |
BUSINESS
PAST ACTIVITIES OF THE COMPANY
The Company was incorporated in October 1995 in Bangalore, the hub of Information Technology industry in India. In April 1996, the Company received approval from the Software Technology Parks of India, Bangalore for setting up the 100% export oriented unit under the STP Scheme of the Government of India. The Company started its operations like many Silicon Valley start-ups with just five employees and minimal resources. The Company's promoters shared the passion for creating a truly technology and products focussed company that would eschew the low-end service model prevalent in the Indian software industry.
The Company's initial focus was on Database internals, Data warehousing and Middleware Technologies. Since its incipient stage the Company has believed in being selective in its assignments and projects. In 1996-97, the Company bagged its first major project for building Data warehousing software for Datatools Inc, a Silicon Valley Company. Data warehousing refers to a software strategy where information from various ‘islands’ of operational data sources (such as databases) are aggregated into another data store for analysis. The Company was involved in developing a comprehensive Extract, transform and Load solution.
In 1996, the Company worked with IBM Almaden Research Centre, San Jose, in developing Datalink technologies that enables database systems to control various data sources while maintaining differential and transactional integrity. This technology is now implemented in IBM DB2 set of products. This technology is also a part of ANSI SQL standards.
The Company then went on to bag a prestigious contract from Microsoft Corporation, USA for regression test suite development for the Storage Engine for SQL 7.0. The contract took nearly two years for complete execution. The Company also worked with Microsoft on other Database tools like EditPage Utility, Performance Monitor, Log Analyzer etc. Working on Microsoft projects helped the Company in gaining thorough knowledge of various database internal technologies such as Lock Manager, Transaction Manager, Index Manager, Backup/Restore, File/File Group, Logging/Recovery etc. as well as of Allocation Maps and Page/Record level structures.
Gradually the Company increased its solution offerings. It developed Database connectivity solutions for companies like Ardent Software Inc. and Enterworks Inc. These projects involved developing data access techniques for heterogeneous data sources. The Company concurrently decided to leverage the experience gained by it in various Internet Middleware technologies and Java technologies to conceive its own Application Server.
In June 1998, the Company launched its first product - Jp@ct. (acronym for Java Powered Access Technology) is a high performance, scalable and multi-threaded server with many reusable components. The development of this product enabled the Company in consolidating its core competencies in Multithreaded Servers, Caching Techniques, Load Balancing, Failover Techniques, High Availability, Encryption/Decryption, SSL, Firewalls, Client/Server side scripting, Java servlets/applets, Search Engines, Rules Engines etc.
The Company then spearheaded the implementation of a vertical market solution based on Jpact. The product is christened Jpact List Server. It is an Internet based end to end e-commerce platform through which data merchandisers can package, distribute and securely sell data over internet. The product helps businesses to transition offline transaction to Internet. Apart from enabling electronic billing and payments, Jpact also help ensure the security and privacy of data. Jpact provides the user with the facility to access a large volume of data stored across multiple and different types of data sources, perform extensive data analysis, ad-hoc querying and generate graphic reports. It also the information merchandiser to maintain user proifiles and has in-built usage tracking that allows the information merchandiser to track both usage and data access patterns. Jpact Listserver was the Company's first foray in e-business integration and system innovation business.
The Company developed various solutions for companies like Zapdata, DMW etc., using Jpact technology. In 1999, in order to exploit the data merchandisers particularly in the US, the Company decided to transfer the Intellectual Property Rights of Jpact to its wholly owned subsidiary Aztec Software Inc.
The Company considers Jpact as an evolutionary development process. It propelled the Company's focus on e-engineering solutions business. The Company also started developing expertise in emerging technologies like XML, which are posing a threat for traditional system integration business.
In November 1998, on account of its expertise in XML, the Company became a member of the technical committee for FIXML. The purpose of this committee is to transition existing FIX protocol to leverage XML technologies for Financial Institutions. The Company then developed a FIXML solution - FIX Engine Vendor for Silicon Summit Technologies, Inc.
In 1999, Aztec worked with Entreworks Inc. in defining an XMI based repository architecture. The Company also co-architectured XML support for a database vendor Pervasive Software Inc.
Aztec also worked with Microsoft for testing of MS SQL server 8.0 XML support features. The Company is also working on testing for C2 security compliance and test auditing for features of MS SQL server 8.0.
PRESENT ACTIVITIES OF THE COMPANY
The Company is currently engaged in two types of business activities:
The Company is providing e-engineering solutions relying upon its expertise in
In mid-1999, the Company decided to exclusively focus on providing e-engineering solutions and technology services to the customers comprising of new business model on the Internet in B2B space – primarily the Application Service Providers (ASPs) and e-exchanges. For the last 14 months, the Company is engaged in developing, architect and e-integrating the solutions for ASPs and early stage Internet companies. The Company focuses on delivering innovative solutions that drive competitive advantage by designing and implementing new business models.
Most of the assignments are mission critical and cater to the highest end of value chain. The Company is extremely technology focussed. Its current focus area in ASP value chain is on Application Management, which comprises of
The Company is currently working on ASP-enabling assignments and B2B exchanges assignments for clients such as Asera, Jamcracker etc.
JAMCRACKER, INC. – CASE STUDY
Problem:
Jamcracker is "The complete web-based workspace for business applications and services."SM Jamcracker selects, tests, aggregates, and integrates best-of-breed web-based services, applications, and tools. Further, they deliver them via the Internet and enable their customer to access them through a secure portal. Jamcracker also manages multiple vendors on their customers’ behalf, and integrate those into a single platform, constantly monitoring their performance, and preventing IT problems before they occur. In summary, Jamcracker takes care of all the business applications and IT services needs of its customers, so that they can focus on the business that they do.
Jamcracker’s offering to customers include:
Other system requirements were:
Solution:
To meet the market needs of Jamcracker, a two-phased approach was adopted:
Phase I: A quick prototype using Active Server Pages that demonstrated the basic functionality of the solution. This was demonstrated to potential customers.
Figure 1: Phase I Solution
Phase II: The actual solution based on the Java platform. The solution was designed based on the J2EE standard for enterprise applications.
Figure 2: Phase II Solution
Apart from building the above solution, special consideration had to be given to:
Conclusion:
With the two-phase approach and Aztec’s expertise in Java and XML technologies, Aztec was able to deliver a solution to Jamcracker within the timeframes set by the customer. Also, leveraging Aztec’s development center in Bangalore, an effective 24 hours development and test cycle was achieved. This helped in building the solution in the given timeframes. Today Aztec continues to work with Jamcracker in enhancing the solution.
The Company is working with clients like Viador and Embracadero for development of their core products. The Company is also working on testing patches for various operating systems for all the versions of MS SQL. Microsoft has provided the infrastructure for setting up this QA service. The work with these clients is, again, in the area of focus for Aztec, viz., middleware, database/data warehouse and XML technologies. In the past, the Company has worked with other product companies such as Pervasive Systems, Ardent Software, Enterworks Inc. etc. in the areas of databases/data warerhouse and XML.
There are several benefits to the Company in associating with these product companies:
BUSINESS STRATEGY
Aztec is a focussed E-engineering solutions company, with very strong technological expertise. The Company's expertise lies in Database Internals, Internet Middleware, XML and other emerging technologies like WML, which it effectively utilizes for providing e-business solutions for its clients. The Company's current focus customer segment includes ASPs, B2B Exchanges and new age Internet companies. The Company's area of expertise i.e. Middleware - is also sometimes referred to as 'plumbing' because it connects two sides of an application and passes data between them. The Company is engaged in plumbing for the growing digital economy. For the majority of its customers, the systems and solutions that the Company builds are at the core of their business models.
Aztec's objective is to build upon its position as a leading e-business architect for emerging Internet business models in the B2B space. The Company's strategy for achieving this objective is as follows:
Maintaining leading edge capabilities in the focus area
The Company has selected Internet Middleware with current emphasis on B2B space including ASPs and online exchanges, as its customer focus areas. The Company, being itself a start-up is currently well positioned to collaborate and work with other start-ups as against the enterprises as it understands the requirements and culture of these companies. The Company has over a period of time developed sufficient expertise in XML technologies which is extremely important for working with ASPs and for providing XML enabled system integration for online exchanges and new age Internet companies. The Company also enjoys a cultural match with Internet start-ups. The Company believes that it will enjoy the first mover's advantage in ASP enabling business. ASP enabling business is still embryonic and thus provides tremendous growth potential. The Company also works with large Software producers like Microsoft and Viador for understanding the emerging technologies and products of the future. The Company believes that its clients choose to work with it because of its reputation of successfully handling information technology's challenging assignments and delivering the products on time. The implementation life cycle of most of its assignments is very short and time to market is critical for its clients. The Company is committed for timely delivery of its services in order to maintain its market position.
Selective but prolonged client engagements
To continue to differentiate its service offerings and achieve recognition as a leading e-business architect for emerging Internet business models, the Company intends to be selective with respect to the clients it serves and the engagements it undertakes. The Company has a well-laid down sponsorship process for taking up a new assignment. Since most of the customers are emerging dot coms with little proven business model, the Company carefully evaluates the new customer on the basis of following parameters:
Due to a pro-active client selection strategy, the Company so far has never experienced any bad debts. The Company has always believed in refraining from succumbing to the pressures of near term benefits. The Company boasts of ability to pass on lower end, less exciting engagements in order to maintain exciting and challenging work environment. The Company believes in focussing on few customers and establishing prolonged relationship with them. The Company also believes in actively managing its portfolio of client engagements to ensure that it works on complex client assignments that will allow it to refine it capabilities on ongoing basis.
Intense Technical Expertise
The Company believes that technical expertise will play a major role in success in ASP enabling market. The assignments for ASP enabling are mission critical with very little scope for error. Time to market is critical for ASPs. The technical expertise resulting in compressed delivery time will be the major differentiation as well as the barrier for entry in the business. The Company has over a period of time developed expertise in all the Database internals and middleware technologies including Internet middleware technologies, application servers and related Java technologies. The Company also enjoys considerable expertise in XML, the enabling technology for e-commerce. The Company is also focussing on newer wireless technology enablers like WAP and WML.
In order to be on the forefront of cutting edge technologies, the Company has a dedicated technology development team consisting of architects and knowledge management professionals reporting to the Chief Technology Officer. To ensure that the technology team builds components/frameworks/solutions that are relevant for real life customers. Architects are involved in customer-oriented projects for at least 50% of their time. The Company is always on the lookout of newer technologies and believes in delivering solutions to its clients, using the latest and most cost effective enabling technology. The Company keeps track of all the standardization efforts and various standards and tools being developed for XML. The Company also believes in working with companies like Microsoft for co-development of future technologies.
Nimble footed approach towards market
The Company – currently- is consciously avoiding vertical market expertise. It believes that the ASP and other B2B space markets are too young and too big, and demand is too strong for lack of vertical expertise to be the limiting factor for the Company's near term success. The Company is aiming at developing platform neutral solutions. The Company understands that in the long term, if need arises, it will endeavor to vertically re-orient its business. The Company also believes that in the long-run it may have to re-orient its business to cater to Enterprise clients. The Company has in the past attempted at developing vertical expertise through JpactList Server. The Company has also attempted at gaining vertical market expertise in Financial Services sector through certain FIXMLising assignments. The Company will also be on the lookout for new business models in B2B space and would endeavor to architect and develop solutions for them by leveraging its core database and middleware expertise. The Company intends to increase its focus on rapidly growing solution areas in which it believes that its expertise will be relevant.
Forging Right Relationships and Partnerships
The Company believes in forging relationship with other e-business intermediaries especially those, which are strong on the strategy or creative side. The Company believes that such partnerships would enhance the sales pipeline and deal flow translating into revenue and earnings growth. Such relationships will help the Company in consolidating the market share even when the relationships became increasingly front driven. The Company also intends to forge relationships with product vendors as well as web hosting firms. The Company intends to work quickly for forging corporate relationships. The Company believes that strong corporate relationships result in networking which helps in winning over the new business. Such relationships are likely to compensate for the skill sets that include disciplines well outside of the technical space.
Hire, retain and retrain outstanding professionals
The Company believes that hiring, retaining and retraining outstanding professionals and maintaining a culture that fosters innovation is essential for its growth. The Company is in the process of setting-up "Aztec Learning Center" for constantly upgrading the skill sets of its employees. The Company believes in providing compensations that are well above the industry average. It also has a generous stock option plan with which it hopes to emerge as incubator of excellence. The Company firmly believes in sharing wealth with its employees. The employees through the trust will eventually own 27% of the Company's outstanding share capital, post issue. As Aztec grows in size and stature, the goodwill of its employees is going to attract more talent to its fold.
The Company believes in providing a corporate culture that drives the attraction and retention of employees. The Company believes in rewarding teamwork. The Company has an open organizational structure with minimum hierarchy. The employees are encouraged for spending nearly 5% of their total time on training. The Company also believes in constantly upgrading its physical infrastructure for providing a more comfortable working environment.
Managing Scalability and refining delivery approach
The Company is committed to adopting world-class systems, methodologies and processes for managing the operational efficiencies and scalability. The Company is in the process of implementing various internal controls to effectively monitor the project implementation and make execution less dependent on particular individual. The majority of the Company's customers are start-ups who frequently alter their deliverable needs and expect rapid deployment of solid and scalable solutions. Thus in order to overcome the challenges of working for start-ups as well as to maintain its pristine execution track record, the Company intends to ramp up its internal controls. The Company has formed a team led by Quality Assurance Director for developing and implementing the internal processes. The Company has also hired senior executives from industry for managing its rapid growth and scalability.
The Company has developed AzASP framework to architect, evaluate, e-engineer and integrate the ASP solution. The Company intends to constantly factor in the experience gained in project implementations for refining and advancing its capabilities. Refinement of delivery approach will be further boosted with development of internal controls. The Company intends to have a resource allocation system for deploying consultants based on experience and skill set.
IP Strategy and Knowledge Management
Knowledge Management is going to be the key focus area for managing the Company's growth. The Company tries to retain the IPRs for most of its developments without infringing upon any of the customer's rights. A team headed by CTO is leading Aztec’s knowledge management initiatives. The Company has developed a library of its IPs. It is focusing on identifying and developing components that are reusable in many customer engagements. These components can either be used as part of a bigger solution or licensed as a stand-alone component to a customer. With its IP and frameworks, Aztec may be able to service more customers with lesser number of people (that is customer acquisition does not result in proportional number of people being added to the system). The knowledge management team is responsible for the collection, documentation and dissemination of Aztec’s owned IP within the Company. The knowledge management team maintains the repository of Aztec’s IP that is referred by every Project Manager at the beginning of each customer engagement to find out the relevant IP component/design/know-how that can be reused in that engagement. The Company intends to implement a formalized procedure for maintaining and upgrading its IP library. The Company also intends to make this library available to all its employees through intranet. The Company provides full Internet access to all its employees so that they can constantly utilize enormous knowledge available on the World Wide Web.
Growth through selective acquisition
Aztec believes in achieving long term growth by way of sustained financial performance and efficient operations. The Company also believes that rapid growth being witnessed in the ASP business would result in substantial jump in the demand for its services. The Company is still in its nascent stage and therefore in order to add bulk quickly to achieve serious and critical mass, the Company would be looking for selective acquisition opportunities. The Company would be thus pursuing its growth plans not just by building its in-house strengths but also through judicious inorganic growth. It is extremely important for the Company to increase its billable headcount at a lightening speed. The acquisition will help Company in expanding geographically and adding expertise rapidly.
Serve clients globally
The Company plans to expand its services and solution capabilities to client locations around the world. The expansion will be revenue-based-- the Company intends to open additional offices primarily where they have existing clients in the geographic region. It believes this will enable it to develop closer relationships with and provide more convenience to its clients who are increasingly seeking service providers with global presence and experience in deploying solutions that address issues of multiple currencies and languages, infrastructure diversity and around-the-clock operations. The Company also expects that global expansion will allow it to capitalize on high growth geographic regions and diversify its revenue base. The Company is currently contemplating opening offices in Europe and the eastern coast of the USA
AZTEC BUSINESS MODEL
The Company believes that the following capabilities and characteristics of its Business Model differentiate it from other information technology services providers:
The Company follows a business model, which is a combination of onsite front end coupled with offshore back end. Aztec's software service model is predominantly based on its abilities to perform offshore software development from its development center in Bangalore with only a very small portion of software project work being done onsite. The Company uses its wholly owned subsidiary for marketing its services. Business development managers are located in the US, who along with the Architects are responsible for understanding the client's need. The entire software development work is then done offshore. The Company uses fat data pipes for providing seamless service to its clients. Due to the use of fat data pipes, the Company is able to avoid replicating the development environment in India and employees in India development center are able to log on to the client’s system remotely.
Aztec's Delivery Model
This model has been essentially designed to capitalize the competitive advantages enjoyed by Indian software companies, over competitors located in the US, Europe and Japan. Some of the advantages that the Company feels, this particular business model provide to it are:
The Company uses its wholly owned subsidiary for marketing its services as well as providing onsite services to its clients. The Company firmly believes that full onsite business model is not suitable for the niche segment of B2B space to which it is catering.
The Company believes in showing hypersensitivity towards its customer's need. Thus in order to mitigate any potential concerns that its client may have towards the efficacy of its seamless onsite and offshore model successful, the Company has evolved the concept of Single Point of Contact for all its assignments. The Single Point of Contact for various stages of Project Development are:
Since the business relationships are more and more being driven from the front, the Company thought it appropriate to provide just one face of the firm to its clients. The Business Development Manager is the key for the Company's strategy of selective but prolonged client assignments. The Project Director is responsible for delivering quality solution with a very short turnaround time. The Company believes that this model is beneficial for its functioning because
The Company believes in developing long term relationships with its clients. It focuses on delivering solutions for its clients' business challenges, which are critical for their businesses. These solutions provide value to the clients by enhancing their ability to communicate with their customers and business partners, allowing them to offer new or enhanced products and services, and providing them opportunities for revenue enhancement and cost reductions.
For most of the ASPs, online exchanges and new age internet companies, which form the majority of the Company's client base, rapid execution is the most critical factor. The Company aligns technology deployment with business objectives and processes and plans deployments in phases to deliver business benefits rapidly. Through extensive business analysis and work with clients to define and articulate their business goals and constraints, Aztec is able to discern a project's critical business requirements before proceeding to technology considerations. The Company then implements a bare bone but solid solution, which is scaleable. Once the ASPs have established their business presence, Aztec begins to accumulate customer feedback. Aztec then uses the customer feedback and factors in the ever-changing business requirements of its clients to upgrade and enhance the solution. The Company normally enters into long term Master Service Agreements with its clients. It is extremely important for Aztec to thus develop a partner like relationship with all its clients. The Company believes that with the partnership model it will be in a position to couple its business with the burgeoning size of its customers.
Time and Material (T&M): It is not often easy to define the scope of a project in the e-engineering business. Specifications, deliverables and implementation plans undergo a constant change. This happens because of typical nature of ASP-enabling projects for start-ups, which involves exploratory attempts in unknown areas. T&M based pricing is suitable for a customer in such situations, as billing is based on the number of billable hours per person for the resources deployed. Aztec forms a project team to carry out the project tasks and the customer enjoys the flexibility of enhancing or downsizing the project team according to the progress. Majority of the Company's project in e-engineering solutions arena follow T&M method of pricing.
Fixed Price Projects (FPP): In a situation where the customer's need is very well specified, and the project is clearly defined, fixed price projects are the most appropriate and low risk option for the customer. In a typical FPP, the customer pays a fixed price and the Company ensures quality delivery of the project within the agreed time frame. The company undertakes FPP projects where the customer’s requirements are well defined and understood. Most of such projects are for co-product development and quality assurance for major product developers.
Other Pricing Models: The majority of clients are start-ups, which require extended credit terms. In such cases the Company takes equity warrants from the ASPs in addition to the cash component. The Company has no intentions of turning into venture capital business. The Company judiciously takes warrant only as a compensation for providing better credit terms.
The Company has also worked on new pricing methods like royalty based method or share of profits on milestone basis.
The choice of a particular pricing method is purely guided by business consideration. The Company offers flexible-pricing options to accommodate clients' goals as well as to provide the most appropriate pricing model for the project.
CLIENTS
The Company has worked with over 20 clients till March 2000. It is currently working with 16 clients on various projects. The Company has worked with big enterprises as well as with Internet start-ups and dot coms.
The Company is currently working with 8 B2B players and 6 ASPs. A representative list of the Company’s clients with their respective areas of expertise is:
Jamcracker Inc. |
Offers pre-tested, web-based IT and business services, applications, and tools integrated together from top ASP partners – with single sign-on, single bill, and 24x7 one point support – built on a reliable, comprehensive, and scalable technology platform. |
Asera Inc. |
Extranet platform and solutions for B2B Commerce |
Capstan Systems Inc. |
Provider of B2B infrastructure that links buyers, suppliers and logistics service providers |
Ingenuity Systems Inc. |
Ingenuity is a young, dynamic, fast growing pre-IPO Internet start-up that is building next generation information technologies and knowledge that will revolutionize the way functional genetic data can be used by research scientists. |
Netopia Inc. |
A developer of e-business infrastructure for the small and medium sized businesses |
Reez.com Corporation |
A provider of web applications to automate the entire real estate management process including scheduling and tracking of all real estate transactions. |
A representative list of the Company’s clients with their respective areas of expertise is:
Embarcadero Technologies Inc. |
A developer of Database Lifecycle Management software that helps companies build, optimize and manage databases underpinning e-business and other critical enterprise applications |
Viador Inc. |
Provider of the most comprehensive technology platform for Internet (Business to Business) and Intranet (Business to Employee) portal solutions |
Microsoft Corporation |
A leading software provider for personal and business computing |
Pricing Models
Currently the Company is working with four clients where it is using Fixed Price Pricing Method. It is using Pricing models like Royalty and Part payment through stocks / Warrants with one client each. The Company is using Time and Materials method of pricing for all its remaining assignments.
The Company has entered into Master Services Agreement with 6 clients since March 2000. These projects are likely to be executed over the next one year. On the basis of these Agreements, the Company expects to get revenue in excess of USD 750,000 from each client.
Revenues from Top Customers
For the quarter ended June 30, 2000, the Company obtained 76.75% of its Revenues from its top 5 customers.
Name of the Customer |
(Rs. in millions) |
% of total revenue |
Jam Cracker Inc. (formerly known as Vital Tone Inc.) |
47.67 |
34.46% |
Capstan Systems Inc. |
18.66 |
13.49% |
Asera Inc. |
16.89 |
12.21% |
Viador Inc. |
13.54 |
9.79% |
Apexon Inc. |
9.42 |
6.81% |
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT INITIATIVES
Aztec is a software solutions company with an intense technology focus. For its survival, it is extremely important for Aztec to keep track of the trends in the marketplace and always position Aztec at the cutting edge of technology. As demonstrated by its track record of the last four years, it has not diluted its initial technology focus of middleware and DB/DW technologies. At the same time, it closely monitors rapid changes in technologies and utilize relevant new technology enablers to its core focus areas. For example, it has built enormous capabilities in XML in the last two years and uses this technology enabler in combination with core middleware technologies to offer state-of-the-art solutions to its customers.
Aztec has been investing in research-oriented activities right from the early stages of the Company. Even when resources were scarce, it invested in building a full-fledged 100% java based application server. The Company has a dedicated technology group, managed by the CTO that has a goal to develop reusable components, design and knowledge with the primary purpose of providing fast and efficient solution to Aztec’s customers.
The charter for the technology group is to carry-out research and development activities in the technology areas of focus for the Company, with the primary goal of enabling Aztec’s engineering teams to produce efficient and quality solutions for customers in a time critical fashion.
Technology Team Structure
The CTO heads the technology team that comprises a set of architects and knowledge management professionals. To ensure that the technology team builds components/frameworks/solutions that are relevant for real life customers, architects are involved in customer-oriented projects for at least 50% of their time. The knowledge management team is responsible for the collection, documentation and dissemination of Aztec’s owned IP within the Company. The knowledge management team maintains the repository of Aztec’s IP that is referred by every Project Manager at the beginning of each customer engagement to find out the relevant IP component/design/know-how that can be reused in that engagement. As on August 31, 2000, the Technology Team constituted of 16 employees.
Research Oriented Activities
The research activities are focused on two significant activities in the ASP enablement area.
In the area of XML, Aztec started by investing in tools development for FIXML. Later, it was able to utilize these tools for a customer requiring a FIXML engine. Aztec actively tracks various XML standards / working drafts that are relevant to its areas of operation such as XMI, RosettaNet, BizTalk, ebXML etc. It also has the distinction of being a member of the technical committee on FIXML. Aztec has built certain tools in the XML area that it has licensed to its customers. Aztec is also developing its IP in the area of XML processing (indexing, caching etc.) so that performance involving XML data can be enhanced. The Company is also working closely with a customer in developing a new XML initiative for IT related transactions.
In the past, Aztec has invested heavily in building products like Jpact and Jpact ListServer. Jpact is a 100% java based high performing, scalable, multi-threaded application server. Jpact ListServer is a vertical market application of Jpact technology for the data merchandising market. Jpact and Jpact Listserver have provided many reusable components that are being used in various customer engagements.
One of the key activities of the technology group is to identify and develop components that are reusable in many customer engagements. These components are either used as part of a bigger solution or licensed as a stand-alone component to a customer. As all of Aztec’s projects/customer assignments utilize similar technologies/tools, the Company is able to project the need for certain components that can be reused in multiple customer engagements. Aztec has developed and is continuing to develop many such components. For example, Aztec has a comprehensive rules engine, a robust scheduler, an end-to-end extract, transform and load (ETL) tool, adaptors for third party products that can be reused by ASP customers etc. Aztec is also actively working on incorporating latest technology enablers such as WAP into its technology offerings.
Thus, with a combination of prudent investment in in-house technology development and engagement of technical architects with real life customers, Aztec is able to keep track of the trends in the marketplace and position itself at the cutting edge of technology.
TECHNOLOGY AND THE PROCESS OF CREATION OF SOFTWARE
Aztec approach towards software solutions flows directly from being business-value driven, architecture-based and deployment-focused. Aztec emphasizes on rigorous business alignment during assessment and architecture phases, and address critical performance and operational requirements during architecture and development phases to ensure successful system deployment and operation. The Company has formalized its implementation solution methodology and has named it AzASP Framework.
The Company believes that its solutions are constructed for scalable performance, reliable and consistent service levels, and high levels of flexibility and longevity. It identifies performance and service level requirements in the early stages of the solution process and enters into Master Services Agreement with all its clients before starting the Project.
The creation of software for ASP Projects broadly consists of the following phases:
Analysis Phase
Setup Phase
Design Phase
Coding & Unit Testing
System Testing
Deployment Testing
In the Product development Partner business, the level of work performed by the Company varies from Project to Project. The steps followed for this line of service offering are also same as that described for E-engineering solutions business. In addition to the various phases of Product development, the Company also conducts Product research for its clients where it prepares a matrix of the technical specifications/features of the competitive products. The Company then analyses them with the client for arriving at the new product’s specifications.
QUALITY ASSURANCE
The Company believes that its customers choose to work with it because of its reputation of delivering robust and scalable solutions in a short span of time. Time to market but without compromising on quality is critical for the Company. The Company believes in following world-class processes and controls. Aztec is in the process of revamping its quality control and internal control measures in line with the ramping up of its business operations. A quality control team headed by a Quality Assurance Director leads Aztec’s quality initiative.
The Company has also entered into an agreement with RelQ Software Private Limited for independent validation and verification services. A quality assurance engineer from RelQ will be assigned to each project since project inception and planning stage and will be responsible for testing for bugs. Quality Assurance Director will review the testing process and test cases prepared by RelQ team for each project.
The Company documents the requirement specifications, technical/design specifications during various phases of software development. The Project Manager reviews the code and unit testing conducted by team members and updates the Project plan.
The Company is also planning to automate some of the quality control processes. The Company is actively reviewing the purchase of Productivity improvement tools for unit testing, which emphasizes on code coverage and path coverage. The Company is planning to procure the tools for system testing, which would cover GUI testing, functionality testing and Load/Performance testing.
Company is also evaluating the suitability and applicability of standard quality certifications for its business, which requires lot of original work and customization and, if required, will apply for them at an appropriate time.
HUMAN RESOURCES
Aztec believes that attracting and retaining outstanding professionals is the key for its growth. It places a strong focus on attracting, hiring, developing and retaining outstanding personnel. The Company has created significant Intellectual Property through extensive and collective efforts of its software engineers.
Expertise and Capabilities
The recruitment focus at Aztec is to attract the best engineers and business school graduates who are then encouraged to gain expertise in the areas like XML, Java, Database internals, data warehousing and other core focus areas.
The following table gives the distribution of the engineering/technical and managerial professionals by their primary skills:
Skills |
Percent |
BE/B.Tech. |
51% |
M.Tech./MS |
8% |
MCA/MSc. |
24% |
PG in Management |
11% |
Chartered Accountancy |
1% |
Others |
5% |
Aztec staffs its projects based on its philosophy that there is no substitute for experience, in contrast to the common approach of relying on primarily inexperienced staff and building a heavily "leveraged" staffing model that depends on methodology rather than experience to guide the judgements and activities of project teams. Aztec's information technology professionals have an average industry experience of more than 3.5 years. Considering the emerging technological areas the Company is working in, the experience is significant. The experience profile of the Company’s employees is
Company currently has 263 (303 including consultants and trainees) employees on its rolls. The Company has two organizational streams - Technical and Management. The break-up of its technical employees (including contractual workers) as on August 31, 2000 is:
Senior Management |
11 |
Architects |
8 |
Program Mangers |
10 |
Project Directors |
8 |
Project Managers |
10 |
Development Leaders |
27 |
Development Engineers |
187 (34 people on contract) |
Aztec's employees have expertise in a broad range of competencies, including project management, business analysis, object modeling, architecture, software development, database modeling and administration, quality assurance, integration and testing, architecture and performance tuning, and data access techniques. They also possess varied technical skill sets ranging from expertise in DB Tools, OLAP to XML and Java. Aztec believes that its staff is recognized in the industry for its rich capabilities in building applications that deal with high transaction volumes and large database requirements. The Company encourages its employees to take on greater responsibilities and grow within the organization.
Recruitment Strategy
The Company has become one of the preferred employers because of its reputation for offering challenging assignments, a conducive work environment, an attractive compensation package and innovative Human Resources policies and practices. The Company’s requirement of manpower will be met with a competent internal resourcing team, and outsourcing through active partnering with consultants. The hiring process is reviewed periodically to incorporate fresh ideas and strategies. This whole process is supported by an extremely innovative and successful recruitment and brand building oriented advertisement campaign the Company has launched a year back in Bangalore and Pune and recently in Mumbai.
The Company has identified 25 technical campuses for campus recruitments. The campus recruitments are preceded by an aggressive promotional strategy, which aims at positioning the Company as an enviable choice at campuses. In year 2000, the Company visited 15 campuses for recruitment. The other innovative strategy that the Company has successfully implemented is the internal referral scheme. The Company believes that word of mouth publicity is extremely important in attracting the right kind of talent. The Company provides monetary incentives to its employees for recommending prospective employees.
Training Strategy
The Company has looked at competency building as a very important area in order to spearhead its transition to a world-class company. The whole effort has been towards institutionalizing learning. Top class training on managerial and people management skills augments the Company’s strategy of pushing everyone to a higher order of jobs. There are two parts of Company’s training strategy: (a) The Orientation Program and (b) Successive advanced training. The Orientation program is aimed at addressing the common training needs of all employees and covers areas like the history, vision and mission statement, behavioral skills, culture and value systems.
The advanced training on capability is an offshoot of a very innovative 360-degree performance feedback process on key job related competencies. The Company intends to devote at least 8 man-days on training for each employee. The Company currently has 6 trainers for providing technical training to its employees. For institutionalizing the training effort, the Company is planning to setup a training center for its employees. The center would be called ‘Aztec Learning Center’ and will be the key facilitator of learning within the Aztec family. The Company has hired Mr. Vidyut Shenoy for setting up the Learning Center. He has vast experience in the area of training and has earlier setup a similar facility with Motorola.
The mission of the Learning Center is to enhance the enabling skills of Aztecians to achieve business and personal goals efficiently; attract and nurture key talent and thereby assisting customers in the effective utilization of Aztec's products. The Learning Center’s focus will be Aztecians and students who wish to learn about Aztec's development tools and processes.
Aztec Learning Center will identify skill gaps, and develop or source-in learning interventions for delivering them to the appropriate audiences. The effectiveness of these learning interventions in improving Aztec's business will be periodically monitored. All of the interventions will be in line with Aztec's business needs. The interventions will take the form of instruction, interaction, consultation, practice and experience sharing. The Learning Center proposes to also use various technologies such as CD-ROMs and internet as the medium for learning. All the interventions will be as close to the point of need, cost effective and tailored to the specific need.
The Company provides full internet access to all its employees so that they can constantly utilize enormous knowledge available on the World Wide Web and upgrade their skills.
Employee Retention Strategy
The Company looks for dynamic and energetic people who can combine technology skills with artistic passion. In order to retain such employees, the Company’s strategy is to enhance employee satisfaction. The Company is also hiring a lot of very good technical talent, which is interested in returning back to India from the US. The Company lays a very high emphasis on internal employee communication. The Company has initiated employee forums like VIBES, TECH TALK, WEEKLY FUNDAE, which are aimed at aligning all employees to the business. These forums also provide opportunities to the employees to interact freely with the senior management. The Company has also implemented a 360-degree performance feedback process. The 360-degree feedback is linked to the self-development process for the employees rather than to employee bonus. The Company has a separate process for performance evaluation that forms the input for performance bonuses.
The Company believes that it provides competitive salaries, benefits and ESOP plan to retain its employees. The Company has one of the most generous ESOP plans. The Plan was formulated in November 1998. After the exercise of options, the employees are likely to hold around 27% of the Company’s post-issue capital on a fully diluted basis. For further details on the ESOP plan please refer to para on Employee Stock Option Plan on page [· ]. The Company also provides employees the opportunity for choosing an appropriate career path of Management stream or Technical stream based upon their needs.
Due to its employee friendly policies, Aztec has so far enjoyed one of the lowest employee attrition rates in the software industry. During last two years, the number of employees that have left the Company are:
FY |
Period end head count |
Employees that left during the year / quarter |
Attrition rate |
1998-99 |
26 |
0 |
0 |
1999-00 |
127 |
5 |
6.5% |
Q1 2000-01 |
190 |
5 |
|
The Company enjoys cordial industrial relations with its employees. There is no union of employees. The Company has not faced any industrial unrest of any kind since its inception. The Company is in material compliance with all laws relating to employment.
Employee Stock Option Plan
The Company has instituted a 1998 Stock Options Plan (Plan) for key employees and officers, directors, consultants and independent advisors of the Company and its subsidiary in pursuance to the special resolution passed by the shareholders at their Meeting held on November 7, 1998. The Expiration date for the options is 10 years from the date of grant and options vest over a maximum period of fifty months. A committee of the Board is responsible for fixing the option price. The options are granted to the employees on the basis of their seniority, experience and other conditions as the Board deems fit. None of the employees have exercised any option till date. In May 2000, the said plan was split into SOP'98-India and SOP'98-U.S. as a result of which SOP'98-India had 4,493,334 options available for grant and SOP'98-U.S was allocated 1,500,000 options. On May 23, 2000 with respect to SOP'98-India, Equity Shares representing the options allocated were allotted to Aztec Software and Technology Limited Employees' Welfare Trust and henceforth all the outstanding options of Indian employees and consultants will be exercised through this Trust. Bonus shares in the ratio of one share for every one share were also allocated to the Employees' Welfare Trust in June 2000. With respect to SOP'98-U.S., Equity Shares representing 1,500,000 options allocated were allotted to Aztec Software and Technology Limited Employees' Welfare Trust and henceforth all the outstanding options of U.S employees and consultants will be exercised through this Trust. As on September 07, 2000, the Trust holds 10,486,668 Equity Shares on behalf of the employees.
The Board through a resolution passed at its Meeting held on August 21, 2000, has decided that post- listing of Equity Shares of the Company, all further approvals for options would be in compliance with the requirements of SEBI (Employee Stock Option Scheme and Employees Purchase Scheme) Guidelines, 1999. For details about the options granted, pricing formula etc., please refer to note to the Capital Structure.
Consultants
The Company has entered into agreements with Kshema Technologies Ltd., Ramsoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd., Bells Softech Limited, Virtual Dynamic Software Limited, Cerebra Integrated Technologies Limited and General Automata Pvt. Ltd. for hiring Consultants for the Company’s work. The Company pays these companies on a mutually agreed rate for the number of personnel provided by them. The Consultants are not eligible for the ESOP plan of the Company.
MARKETING SET-UP
Aztec markets and sells its services through multiple channels including its business development managers, long-term client relationships, relationships with industry analysts, marketing events and public relations. The Company also cultivates relationships with venture capital funds, hardware and software suppliers and others to identify project opportunities and client leads. The Company also has good relations with web hosting services companies like Exodus. These relationships help the Company in getting introduced to new clients and assist in its efforts to secure business opportunities. In return, the Company refers its clients to these suppliers and venture funds with whom it has developed good rapport.
While the Company's marketing channels and relationships with venture capitalists, hardware and software suppliers is used to generate business with new accounts, the Company, through its subsidiary, also employs relationship managers who are responsible for managing relationships with existing clients. Relationship managers seek to ensure client satisfaction, the successful delivery of projects and are able to identify additional opportunities for services at client sites. Relationship Managers or the Business Development Managers are based in the US and work for the wholly owned subsidiary Aztec Software Inc.
Corporate Relationships
The Company understands and appreciates the value of networking and customer referrals in winning business and new customers. The Company believes that knowledge, retention and monetization of customer base is extremely important for its success. So far the Company has received strong customer endorsements which it has successfully leveraged for winning new customers. The top management of the Company as well as independent directors on its Board have very strong contacts with the Silicon Valley companies, which forms its key customer segment. The Company relies on the "Old Boys" network of its key management and technology experts for tapping the new customer base. The Company also believes in developing the corporate relationship network by sending its employees to key summits, conferences, trade fairs and meets. Aztec is the only Indian Company to be empanelled as technical expert of the FIXML Committee. Association with similar committees provides Aztec an edge over its competitors.
SWOT ANALYSIS
Strengths
Weaknesses
Opportunities
Threats
INFRASTRUCTURE AND UTILITIES
The Company's Registered Office and Offshore Development Center is located at Bangalore. The total built-up area of this leased office is 15,000 square feet. This premises is a Bonded Premises under the Customs License No. 35/96 dated June 7, 1996 issued under Section 58 & 65 of The Customs Act, 1962. This office can accommodate 400 employees. The Bangalore office has been obtained on a ten-year lease with effect from February 1, 1999. Aztec is in the process of renovating a 7,500 square feet canteen for its employees in Bangalore Development Center. The Company is also planning to setup a small gymnasium for its employees in the canteen. The Company is in the process of adding two more floors to this office, which will take the total built-up area to 30,000 square feet. The Company has a spacious parking lot of 10,000 square feet for its employees. Aztec’s wholly owned subsidiary in the US, owns an office with 3,000 square feet space.
The Company has a 512Kbps internet link. The Company's Development Center is connected with a 768 KBps data link to Exodus, Santa Clara, US and from there via a T1 line (1.5 MBPS) to Aztec Software Inc.’s (a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company) office in Santa Clara. The Company is in the process of upgrading 768 KBps link to a 2 MBps link.
Each employee is provided with a work station which the Company terms as ‘Z’ stations comprising of a Pentium PC with an internet connection, email and multi-media kit speakers and CD drive.
The hardware that the Company owns is:
Hardware |
Number |
Intel PIII PC |
260 |
IBM Celeron PC |
34 |
AST Machine |
25 |
Routers |
2 |
Laptops |
20 |
Sun Enterprise 250 Servers |
2 |
Dell Poweredge 2400 Server |
4 |
Dell Poweredge 2450 Server |
6 |
Compaq Proliant 6400R Server |
1 |
Dell Poweredge 4400 Server |
2 |
The Company also owns software like the Web Logic Application Server, Oracle 8I, SQL 7.0 Server, New Atlanta, Siteserver, Checkpoint Firewall 4.1, MS Exchange 5.5 etc.
BRAND NAMES AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
Aztec has filed following applications for registration with Trademark Registry of the Government of India:
All the registrations are pending with the Trademark Registry.
Aztec's success is dependent, in part, upon its proprietary processes, components, and other intellectual property rights. The Company relies on a combination of trade secret, nondisclosure and other contractual agreements, and copyright and trademark laws, to protect its proprietary rights. Existing trade secret and copyright laws afford the Company only limited protection. The Company enters into confidentiality agreements with its employees and generally requires that all its consultants, vendors and clients also enter into similar agreements to limit access to and distribution of the proprietary information. The Company also incorporates a non-compete clause in its employment agreements. However, there can be no assurance that the steps taken by Aztec in this regard will be adequate to deter misappropriation of its proprietary information or that the Company will be able to detect unauthorized use and take appropriate steps to enforce its intellectual property rights.
A very large portion of Aztec's business involves the development of software applications for specific client engagements. The client generally retains ownership of client-specific software. Aztec also retains some rights to the applications, processes and intellectual property developed in connection with client engagements. Aztec also generally retains joint ownership with the client of the base software that it uses for the development of further solutions. The Company enters into agreements with all its clients. Its external legal counsel in the US vets all the client agreements that the Company enters into.
EXPORT OBLIGATIONS
The total export obligation of the Company (on Imports & Wage Bills) cumulatively as on March 31, 2000 was Rs. 114.44 million and the Company has cumulatively met, since inception, its export obligation as at March 31, 2000. The Company through its export earnings has met all its outstanding export obligations.
The Company has cumulatively achieved, since inception a net foreign exchange earnings as on June 30, 2000 of Rs. 266.88 million.
COMPETITION
The information technology services business is intensely competitive and subject to rapid technological change. However, the B2B and particularly the ASP market is in its formative stage, the competitive landscape is still in the process of sorting out. The Company faces competition mainly from the US based tradition system integration firms, which also combines application outsourcing and hosting expertise. Many Indian traditional software firms are also moving towards e-engineering businesses. Thus, the Company faces potential competition from all Indian software companies as well. The Company also faces competition from other pure play ASP enabling players in countries like Philippines, China and Ireland who are also targeting the ASP enabling market. The Company's current focus customer segment is start-up ASPs and the Company believes that traditional large digital consulting firms are likely to concentrate more on enterprises rather than start-ups.
In addition, there are low barriers to entry into the Company's business. Aztec does not own any technologies that preclude or inhibit competitors from entering the industry. Existing or future competitors may independently develop and patent or copyright technologies that are superior or substantially similar to Aztec's technologies. The costs to develop and to provide information technology services are relatively low. Therefore, Aztec expects to continue to face additional competition from new entrants into the industry.
INDUSTRY SCENERIO
Background
Over the last decade the Indian software industry has grown to command one of the most important places in Indian industry. Industry revenues have grown from a mere US$ 50 million in 1988-89 to about US$ 5.7 billion in 1999-2000, at a consistent growth rate of 50%+ since 1991. According to a study done by McKinsey for Nasscom, the industry can achieve a turnover of US$ 87 billion by 2008 of which US$ 50 billion are expected to come from exports.
Today, India is acknowledged as an IT powerhouse and its software professionals and companies are respected all over the world. Indian and India-centric companies are now in a position to become large multinationals in their own right. Four India based Infotech companies are already listed on NYSE/NASDAQ. As on August 20 2000, the market capitalisation of the Indian software sector (domestic) constituted over 24% of the BSE Sensex. At the same time the global financial community has shown considerable interest in the Indian software sector and even the Government is committed to providing all support to sustain the growth of this sector.
India has considerable advantages over other countries like China, Philippines and Indonesia both in the number and quality of manpower. Indian software professionals score over professionals in these countries because of their superior technical skills, language proficiency and their availability in large number. Indian software companies have an edge over companies in these countries because of the relationships they have built over the years and the quality of their services.
The profile of the Indian software companies is also undergoing a change. The earlier model was based more on the lower costs of software professionals and services here. There was little overseas presence and growth was organic with few or no alliances. However, this situation is changing, with companies going in for global sales and marketing presence as well as alliances with global players.
Traditional companies and newer dot coms are taking advantage of IT to transform business models, strategies and the underlying process. The e-enabling of systems have resulted in lower costs of procurement, reduction in operational expenses, speeded up time to market, enhanced revenues and reduced buyer transaction costs.
Industry Trends and Developments
Evolution of Internet Usage
The Internet usage by the corporates has evolved through four distinct phases. In the first phase, the web was used primarily to present information (e.g. product and marketing information) and hence required low expertise with knowledge of HTML being sufficient.
The second phase involved using the web for marketing and brand building, awareness and advertising. The focus was on B2C commerce service companies need to have expertise in HTML and Java.
The current period is experiencing the third phase of internet usage where the focus is on creating the transaction oriented systems geared to service both the ultimate consumers (B2C) and other businesses (B2B). The key knowledge areas for service companies include C++, HTML, Java and XML. Though less technological sophisticated companies have still been able to thrive, the need for technical expertise is becoming more necessary.
The next generation of Internet usage will involve functionality like supply chains, management of customer relationships, and wireless integration. This new phase is propelled by a corporate desire for a competitive advantage by adopting unconventional business models, elimination e-business veneers, and replacing these veneers with systems that are seamlessly integrated into corporation’s internal IT infrastructure. These solutions are obviously far more mission critical than the previous phases, and services companies must possess more knowledge in a wider range of areas. These areas include not only the basic Internet technologies (HTML, Java and XML). They also require greater true technology expertise as e-business solutions must be integrated into a corporation’s back office systems – C++, COBOL, ERP applications, data warehousing, Internet security, and network architecture. The fourth phase is also marked by the entry of wireless technology in the periphery of e-business. Wireless access to Internet is being piloted in 2-way pagers, personal organizers and mobile phones. WAP and voice recognition are two of the enabling components.
Developments in E-commerce: Online B2B Exchanges
Online business-to-business (B2B) exchanges operate in a similar style to securities exchanges around the world. These exchanges can be used efficiently to acquire the firm’s inputs and to sell the firm’s outputs. Chart below illustrates the consequent reduction in complexity. And the implicit decrease in search, analysis, and transaction costs implies a large return for those who participate. Analysts believe that online B2B transactions will explode over the next few years from $200 billion in 2000 to $1.5 trillion by 2004. A large number of these B2B transactions will be conducted via B2B exchanges. B2B exchanges create huge communities of users, including counter-parties and service & network vendors. By developing partnerships and alliances with these exchanges, organisations can gain access to these communities of users and offer them standardized services through a single hub.
ONLINE EXCHANGES REDUCE MARKETPLACE FRICTION
FOR BOTH BUYERS AND SELLERS
SOURCE: DELOITTE RESEARCH
A
Trends in Digital Consulting
The business world is keen for consulting help. Lean organizations lack the technical, strategic and project management skills to handle the benumbing rate of technological and market change.
The consulting industry is splitting at its seams to accommodate the demand. Big consulting firms are adding new employees, acquiring smaller firms and merging with peers. Small firms, or "boutiques," are coming up everywhere.
IT consultancy combines three disciplines – strategy, creative and technology. Technological expertise could play a more important role in 2000 than it did in 1998 and 1999. E-business architects that possess particularly deep technical skills would play an important role in e-business.
The key drivers for this technology focus is –
In addition to a boom in the number of consulting firms, the size of individual firms is growing in response to another industry trend: one-stop shopping. Consulting providers are broadening their skill sets and geographic reach to try to fill their clients' every need. Since a single application can involve many different types of technologies and extend across the globe, it makes good business sense to have all major competencies in-house. Consensus estimates of Analysts expect the worldwide demand for Internet services to grow to US$99.1 billion by 2004 from the present level of US$16.2 billion at a five-year CAGR (99-04) of 43.7%.
Changing Role of Digital Consultants
Digital Consultants offer two distinct types of business solutions: Faster, Better & Cheaper (FBC) and Innovative. These solutions differ primarily in the amount of value they add to their clients’ digital strategies. While the current demand is robust for many types of digital solutions, for the longer term, it is expected that the digital consultants who are focussed on delivering Innovative solutions will enjoy greater pricing power and a more sustainable competitive position.
The traditional system integration firms with their more technical skill sets are likely to be successful in offering FBC solutions. The FBC solution is defined as those that Web-enable existing processes. While this solution clearly reduces an organization’s costs and improves operational efficiency, unlike innovative solutions, it does not affect company’s competitive position or revenue generation ability.
For innovative solutions the role of technology is to support, not drive, the desired business solution. Thus, successful competitive-enhancing digital solutions will not be developed under the constraints of an existing technology infrastructure and this marks a critical deviation from historical initiatives, where technology choices determined the solution and any required business re-engineering.
Small consultancies or boutiques are also joining the fray to meet the huge demand. They follow a different strategy—being the very best at a narrow competency. Boutiques have an advantage over the big consultants in that they can ramp up on a new technology quickly, whereas big firms take a year or two. But choosing a small firm requires more work on the part of clients to separate the dross from the real experts. Boutiques are also sometimes a riskier choice because they could get bought up tomorrow or go out of business. Thus, unless they have established relationships with other consultancies, smaller consulting companies aren't likely to work on large, complex efforts or dispersed geographic initiatives.
Development of XML
Extensible markup language (XML) is another key technology that has allowed inter-company collaboration to rise to a new, more complex level. XML is based on the same principles as hypertext markup language (HTML) and defines and formats electronic information. XML-based software translates internal corporate information, transports it across the Internet, and reconfigures the information into a format that can be understood by the partner’s system. Prior to XML, businesses still conducted at least some transactions electronically using electronic data exchange (EDI). Some of the drawbacks of the EDI which are solved by the Internet technology are – a) EDI was usually conducted on expensive private networks; b) EDI required software at both ends of the connection, which requires expensive development and ongoing maintenance; c) EDI is batch oriented, an obstacle to real-time production, procurement and pricing. The increased functionality, lower cost and universal access enabled by Internet technologies are allowing cumbersome EDI networks to be replaced.
Evolution of Internet Architecture
The Internet architecture and the resulting e-business solutions are a hybrid and an extension of the mainframe and client/server architectures. Both previous computing architectures solved important business needs, but they have significant shortcomings for today’s requirements. Applications under both the mainframe and client/server models were designed for internal users only. In such an environment, the end user’s desktop configuration was known and controlled. In the Internet model, this is no longer the case since many of the users are outside the company. Their hardware configurations aren’t known, nor would it be feasible to constantly download entire applications to the user’s device. From a centralization perspective, the applications must be capable of high reliability and scalability in a high transaction volume setting. The internet architecture has also placed additional demands on computing because the applications often require real-time processing capability.
Application Service Provider: The new business model
Internet technology is also creating a new business model in computer services arena - Application Service Providers (ASPs). One of the big factors enabling this industry is that the thin client nature of Internet applications makes the applications more readily hosted outside the corporation. As a result, ASPs can host applications and "rent out" usage to clients. ASPs offer clients both cost savings "(reduced implementation and maintenance costs) as well as the ability to tap into the best practices using those applications. In some cases, it allows smaller companies access to applications they could not afford on their own.
An ASP is a third-party service firm, which deploys, manages and remotely hosts a pre-packaged software application through centrally located servers in a "rental" or lease arrangement. It acts as an intermediary by facilitating a remote, centrally managed "rent-an-application" service between the organization or client and the independent software vendor. ASPs offer customers access to a new application without having to make investments upfront in the licenses, servers and other resources. An ASP either owns the software or has an agreement with the software seller to license access to the software. It enters into partnerships with vendors to either offer standardized or unique offerings depending on the needs of the specific client.
Market Opportunities
In the recent past the B2B e-commerce is growing at a very fast rate. U.S. Commerce Department and Internet Analysts estimates total Global B2B E-commerce market to grow to around US$1400 billion. The increase in B2B transactions will force companies to increase spending on infrastructure for enabling B2B e-commerce. This is going to create tremendous opportunities for Internet architects and digital consultants who could assist Companies with online exchanges and other B2B initiatives.
The ASP industry, although in its embryonic stage, is one of the most exciting developments in the IT industry. Currently various analysts have pegged the size of ASP market between US$ 2 billion and US$ 20 billion by 2003. The early adopters and targeted markets for the ASP alternative have been small to medium size enterprises (SMEs). It is estimated that there are 300,000 emerging enterprises in the US with revenues of less than US$500 million and IT budgets of $5 million or less. It is expected that, less than 5% of the emerging enterprises in the US will need to utilize an ASP solution to achieve projected market size. The ASP industry is highly fragmented as is customary in many early stage industries. The prospects for the ASP market have captured the interest and commitment from a large number of companies and industries. By all accounts, the ASP concept will be a formidable alternative to traditional methods.
(Source: www.cherrytreeco.com, October 1999 report, available for free downloads on Internet)
Nasscom McKinsey report considers ASPs as an attractive new customer segment for Indian Service companies. ASP markets are likely to develop due to various factors like shortage of skilled IT labor, need for accelerated application deployment, increasing complexity of technology, ubiquity of internet, increased bandwidth, willingness to transfer ownership risk and mitigation of security risks.
Technical Terms
For the benefit of the investors, certain technical terms, which are related to the business of the Company, have been described below. The meaning is approximate and investors are advised to refer to technical literature for detailed description.
Application |
: |
A software program that carries out some useful task. Database managers, spreadsheets, communications packages, graphics programs, and word processors are all examples of applications. |
Application Development Environment |
: |
The combination of hardware and software used to develop an application. |
Application Server |
: |
An application server is designed to help make it easier for developers to isolate the business logic in their projects (usually through components) and develop three-tier applications. Many application servers also offer additional features such as transaction management, clustering and fail-over, and load balancing. |
Architecture |
: |
The architecture of a system refers to how it is designed and how the components of the system are connected to, and operate with, each other. It covers voice, video, data, and text. Architecture also includes the ability of the system to grow "seamlessly" (i.e. without too many large jumps in price). |
Business Logic |
: |
The part of an application program that performs the required data processing of the business. It refers to the routines that perform the data entry, update, query, and report processing, and more specifically to the processing that takes place behind the scenes. A client application comprises a user interface and the business logic. A server application may be mostly business logic. |
Client |
: |
A single user computer that is connected via a network to, and works in conjunction with, one or more shares computers (called servers), with data storage and processing distributed between them in one of number of ways. An OLAP client will not normally store data, but will do some processing and most of the presentation work, with the server handling data storage and the rest of the processing. A client may be single or multi-tasking. Can include both thin and thick clients. |
Client Server |
: |
A computer (the server) on a local-area network that the user (the client) can request information or applications form. Over time, though, client server has come to refer to a computing system that splits the workload between desktops PCs (workstations) and one or more larger computers (servers) joined on a local-area network (LAN). |
Client/Server |
: |
An architecture in which the client (personal computer or workstation) is the requesting machine and the server is the supplying machine, both of which are connected via a local-area network (LAN) or wide-area network (WAN). Since the early 1990s, client/server has been the buzzword for building applications on LANs in contrast to centralized minis and mainframes with dedicated terminals. |
Client/Server Architecture |
: |
An environment in which the application processing is dividend between client workstations and servers. It implies the use of desktop computers interacting with servers on a network in contrast to processing everything in a large centralized mainframe. |
Closed Architecture |
: |
Proprietory design that is compatible only with hardware and software from a single vendor or single product family. Contrast with "Open Architecture". |
CRM |
: |
Customer relationship management is an information industry term for methodologies, software, and usually Internet capabilities that help an enterprise to manage customer relationships in an organized way. For example, an enterprise might build a database about its customers that describes relationships in sufficient detail so that management, salespeople, people providing services, and perhaps the customer directly could access information, match customer needs with product plans and offerings, remind customers or service requirements, know that other products a customer had purchased, and so forth. |
Data Model |
: |
A description of the organization of a database. It is often created as an entity relationship diagram. Today’s modeling tools allow the attributes and tables (fields and records) to be graphically created. The SQL code that defies the data structure (schema) in the database is automatically created from the visual representation. |
Data Warehouse |
: |
A database warehouse consolidates information from many departments within a company. The data can either be accessed quickly by users or put on an OLAP server for more thorough analysis. Data warehouses often use OLAP (online analytical processing) servers, also called a multidimensional database. OLAP data servers are best suited to work with data warehouses. See "Data Warehousing". |
Data Warehousing |
: |
A software strategy in which data are extracted from large transactional databases and other sources, cleansed, transformed and stored in another database, making analysis of the data somewhat easier. See "Data Warehouse". |
Database |
: |
A collection of data structured and organized in a disciplined fashion so that access is possible quickly to information of interest. There are many ways of organizing databases. Most corporate databases are not one singly, huge file. They are multiple databases related to each other by some common thread, e.g., an employee identification number. Databases are made up of two elements, a record and a field. |
Database |
: |
A set of related files that is created and managed by a database management system (DBMS). Today, DBMSs can manage any form of data, including text, images, sound and video. Database and file structures are always determined by the software. As far as the hardware is concerned, it’s all bits and bytes. |
Database Administrator |
: |
A person responsible for the physical design and management of the database and for the evaluation, selection, and implementation of the DBMS. |
Database Management System |
: |
DBMS is a software that controls the organization, storage, retrieval, security, and integrity of data in a database. It accepts requests from the application and instructs the operating system to transfer the appropriate data. |
EJB |
: |
Enterprise JavaBeans (EJB), is a specification, which defines a widely-adopted server-side component architecture for JavaTM 2 Platform, Enterprise Edition (J2EETM), enables rapid development of mission-critical application that are versatile, reusable and portable across middleware while protecting IT investment and preventing vendor lock-in. |
End-User |
: |
Another term for "user". |
Enterprise |
: |
Enterprise means the whole corporation. It tends to refer to corporations with more than one location. |
ERP |
: |
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) is an industry term for the broad set of activities supported by multi-module application software that help a manufacturer or other business manage the important parts of its business, including product planning, parts purchasing, maintaining inventories, interacting with suppliers, providing customer service, and tracking orders. ERP can also include application modules for the finance and human resources aspects of a business. Typically, an ERP system uses or is integrated with a relational database system. The deployment of an ERP system can involve considerable business process analysis, employee retraining, and new work procedures. |
Fat Client |
: |
A client machine in a client/server environment that performs most or all of the application processing with little or none performed on the server. Contrast with thin client and fat server. See "Two-Tier Client/Server". |
FIXML |
: |
FIXML is the FIX (The Financial Information exchange protocol) Markup Language for application messages. The Financial Information Exchange (FIX) protocol is a messaging standard developed specifically for the real-time electronic exchange of securities transactions. It is an XML-derived language, encompassing a series of Document Type Definitions (DTDs) which define the formal representation of FIXML messages. |
HTML |
: |
Hypertext markup language is the authorising software language used on the Web. HTML is used in the creation of Web pages. HTML is basically ASCII text surrounded by HTML commands in angle brackets, which a Web browser interprets. That means different browsers will display the exact same HTML code differently. |
Java |
: |
Java is a programming language from Sun Microsystems designed primarily for writing software to leave on Web sites and downloadable over the Internet to a PC. Java was modeled after C++, and Java programs can be called from within HTML documents or launched as stand-alone programs. The first Web browsers to run Java applications were Sun’s HotJava and Netscape’s Navigator 2.0. Java was designed to run in small amounts of memory and provides its own memory management. |
JavaBeans |
: |
A component software architecture from Sun that runs in the Java environment. JavaBeans are independent Java program modules that can be called up and executed. JavaBeans components can be run remotely in a distributed computing environment using Sun’s Remote Method Invocation (RMI) or the OMG’s CORBA. JavaBeans is the Java counterpart of Mircrosoft’s COM. |
JSP |
: |
Java Server Pages (JSP) is a dynamic scripting capability for web pages that allows Java as well as a few special tags to be embedded into a web file (HTML/XML, etc.). The suffix traditionally ends with .jsp to indicate to the web server that the file is a JSP file. JSP is a server side technology - you can't do any client side validation with it. |
Middleware |
: |
Middleware is software that sits between layers of software to make the layers below and on the side work with each other. On that broad definition, middleware could be almost any software in a layered software stack. However, middleware is an evolving term. |
Mission Critical |
: |
Vital to the operation of an organization. In the past, mission-critical information systems were implemented on mainframes and minicomputers. Increasingly, they are being designed for and installed on personal computer networks. See "Client/Server". |
Network Management |
: |
Monitoring an active communications network to diagnose problems and gather statistics for administration and fine-tuning. Examples of network management products are IBM’s Net View HP’s Open View, Sun’s SunNet Manager, and Novell’s NMS. Almost all network management software supports the SNMP network management protocol. Other management protocols are CMIP and DME. See "Systems Management". |
Object-Oriented Database |
: |
A database that holds abstract data types (objects) and is managed by an object-oriented database management system (OODBMS). |
OLAP |
: |
Online analytical processing is decision-support software that allows the user to quickly analyze information that has been summarized into multi-dimensional views and hierarchies. For example, OLAP tools are used to perform trend analysis on sales and financial information. They can enable users to drill down into masses of sales statistics to isolate the products that are the most volatile. |
OLAP Product |
: |
A product capable of providing fast analysis of shared multi-dimensional information. Ad hoc analysis must be possible either within the product itself or in a closely linked product. |
Relational Database |
: |
A database that is organized and accessed according to relationships between data items. A relational database consists of tables, rows, and columns. In its simplest conception, a relational database is actually a collection of data files that "relate" to each other through at least one common field. For example, one’s employee number can be the common thread through several data files –payroll, telephone directory, etc. one’s employee number might thus be a good way of relating all the files together in one gigantic database management system (DBMS). |
RMI |
: |
Remote Method Invocation (RMI) which is native to Java programming language is used to making method invocations on remote objects. |
Server |
: |
A computer servicing a number of users. It will usually hold data and do processing on the data. An application server may not necessarily store data and a file server may not necessarily do any processing. |
Servlets |
: |
Java programs running on demand on servers. |
SQL |
: |
Structured query language was invented by IBM and first commercialized by Oracle in the early 1980s. SQL is a powerful database language used for creating, maintaining, and viewing database data. It is becoming somewhat of a standard in the mainframe and minicomputer world, and is on its way to becoming a PC standard. When it is a fully accepted standard, different computer systems running different DBMSs will easily be able to communicate and exchange data with each other by simply trading SQL commands. SQL is commonly used with database servers, i.e., those running on a local-area network. There is now an ANSI standard SQL definition for all computer systems. The largest purveyors of SQL databases are IBM, Informix, Microsoft, Oracle, and Sybase. See "SQL Server". |
SQL Server |
: |
Microsoft SQL Server is a Microsoft retail product that provides distributed database management. Multiple workstations manipulate data stored on a server, where the server coordinates operations and performs resource-intensive calculations. |
Systems Management |
: |
(1) The management of system development, which includes systems analysis and design, application development, and implementation. (2) Software that manages computer systems in an enterprises, which may include any and all of the following functions: software distribution, version control, backup and recovery, printer spooling, job scheduling, virus protection, and performance and capacity planning. Depending on organizational philosophy, systems management may include network management or be a part of it. See "Network Management". |
Thin Client |
: |
Clients are devices and software that request information –applications or files. A client is another name for a PC or workstation which is connected to a network, such as a local-area network (LAN), a company’s Intranet, or the Internet. The client runs on a server that houses applications and/or files. The thin client, according to current definition, lacks a hard drive, modem, PCMCIA slot, CD-ROM drive, floppy drive, serial port, and communications port. The thin client comprises a sealed unit with often no potential for enhancement, other than adding memory. However, it does contain RAM, limited processing power, and perhaps a burned-in chip with a program or two, perhaps its user interface. The bulk of the applications and the information it needs remain on the server. |
Three-Tier Client/Server |
: |
Many applications lend themselves to centralized processing. If they contain proprietary algorithms, security is improved. Upgrading is also simpler. Sometimes, programs are just too demanding to be placed into every client PC. In three-tier client/server, application processing is performed on one or more servers. |
Two-Tier Client/Server |
: |
Two-Tier client/server is really the foundation of client/server. The database processing is done on the server. An SQL request is generated in the client and transmitted to the server. The DBMS searches locally and returns only matching records. If 50 records met the criteria, only 50K would be transmitted. This reduces traffic on the LAN. |
WAP |
: |
The Wireless Application Protocol (WAP) is an open, global specification that empowers mobile users with wireless devices to easily access and interact with information and services instantly |
Web Based |
: |
Any software that runs on or interacts with a Web site, which may be on the Internet or on an in-house intranet. |
WML |
: |
Wireless Markup Language (WML) is a Markup Language which is based on XML. WML is read and interpreted by a browser built into the WAP device. For WAP devices, the browser is commonly called a micro browser. The capabilities of the micro browser is of course limited to the capabilities of the WAP device. |
Workflow |
: |
The way work moves around an organization. It follows a path called workflow. More technically, workflow can be defined as the automation of standard procedures (e.g., records management in personnel operations) by imposing a set of sequential rules on the procedure. Each task, when finished, automatically initiates the next logical step in the process until the entire procedure is completed. |
Workflow Management |
: |
The electronic management of work processes such as forms processing (e.g., for insurance policy acceptances, college admissions, etc.) or project management using a computer and electronic messaging as the foundation. See "Workflow". |
XMI |
: |
XML Metadata interchange (XMI) is a use of XML that is intended to provide standard way for programmers and other users to exchange information about metadata (essentially, information about what a set of data consists of and how it is organized). |
XML |
: |
Extensible markup language is a new specification being developed by the W3C. XML is a pared-down version of SGML, designed especially for Web documents. It enables designers to create their own customized tags to provide functionality not available with HTML. |
VI. OPERATIONAL & FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF THE COMPANY FOR LAST FIVE YEARS AND MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION
STATEMENT OF PROFITS AND LOSSES :
(Rs. in million)
|
Year ended 31 March |
Quarter ended June 30 2000 |
||||
|
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software development & services |
0.50 |
5.64 |
19.12 |
13.85 |
136.91 |
138.35 |
Other income |
- |
0.02 |
0.01 |
0.62 |
0.86 |
0.00 |
Total |
0.50 |
5.66 |
19.13 |
14.47 |
137.77 |
138.35 |
Expenditure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Staff costs |
0.04 |
2.26 |
6.68 |
8.95 |
35.66 |
21.24 |
Administration expenses |
0.39 |
3.40 |
8.06 |
12.01 |
48.88 |
66.98 |
Finance charges |
0.02 |
0.22 |
0.64 |
0.26 |
1.44 |
1.46 |
(Increase) / decrease in contracts-in-progress |
- |
(0.60) |
0.60 |
- |
- |
- |
Depreciation |
0.00 |
0.23 |
6.02 |
3.23 |
10.40 |
3.33 |
Total |
0.45 |
5.51 |
22.00 |
24.45 |
96.38 |
93.01 |
Profit from Operations |
0.05 |
0.15 |
(2.87) |
(9.98) |
41.39 |
45.34 |
Preliminary expenses written off |
- |
(0.01) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Product development expenses deferred |
- |
- |
4.35 |
1.44 |
- |
- |
Product development expenses written off |
- |
- |
- |
(5.79) |
- |
- |
Profit / (Loss) before tax |
0.05 |
0.14 |
1.48 |
(14.33) |
41.39 |
45.34 |
Provision for taxation |
- |
0.02 |
- |
- |
0.35 |
0.00 |
Profit / (Loss) after taxation |
0.05 |
0.12 |
1.48 |
(14.33) |
41.04 |
45.34 |
Adjustment for Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) – Note 1 |
- |
(2.57) |
2.57 |
- |
- |
- |
Adjustment for additional depreciation on account of revision in estimated useful life – Note 2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(0.09) |
- |
Profits after adjustments |
0.05 |
(2.45) |
4.05 |
(14.33) |
40.95 |
45.34 |
Notes:
In accordance with the (Disclosure and Investor Protection) Guidelines, 2000, the following adjustments have been made to the Statement of Assets and Liabilities and the Statement of Profits and Losses:
1. Intellectual Property Rights
In the financial year 1996-97, the value of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) capitalised amounting to Rs. 7,700,000 was not depreciated based on an expert opinion. However in the financial year 1997-98, the accounting policy has been changed and the IPR were amortised in three equal instalments commencing from the financial year 1996-97.
2. Additional Depreciation
In the financial year ended March 31, 2000, the Company revised the estimated useful life of its assets and accordingly recomputed the depreciation based on the new rates with retrospective effect rather than with prospective effect. The depreciation of Rs. 0.09 million undercharged to the profit and loss account has therefore been adjusted as a charge to the profit for the year ended March 31, 2000.
(Rs in million) Nature of Income
Interest received on deposits 0.55 Recurring
Miscellaneous receipts 0.07 Recurring
___
0.62
TAXATION STATEMENT
Rupees in lakh
Particulars |
FY 1995-96 |
FY 1996-97 |
FY 1997-98 |
FY 1998-99 |
FY 1999-2000 |
Quarter ended 30 June 2000 |
Tax at Notional Rate |
0.212 |
0.599 |
5.150 |
Nil |
159.396 |
174.547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Export Profits |
(0.524) |
Nil |
(67.584) |
Nil |
(408.616) |
(450.961) |
Difference between Tax Depreciation and Book Depreciation |
(0.006) |
(1.991) |
50.414 |
Nil |
(2.512) |
(2.772) |
Other Adjustments |
Nil |
0.648 |
2.455 |
6.157 |
5.691 |
0.413 |
Net Adjustments |
(0.530) |
(1.343) |
(14.715) |
6.157 |
(405.437) |
(453.320) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Saving thereon: |
(0.212) |
(0.577) |
(5.150) |
2.155 |
(156.093) |
(174.528) |
Total Taxation |
Nil |
*0.022 |
Nil |
**2.155 |
3.303 |
0.019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxation on extraordinary items |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Tax on profits before extraordinary items |
Nil |
0.022 |
Nil |
2.155 |
3.303 |
0.019 |
* The Company has paid tax (inclusive of interest under section 234B and section 234C of the Act) amounting to Rs 13,715 under section 115JA of the Act.
** The total taxation excludes interest under section 234B and section 234C of the Act amounting to Rs 34,833 paid by the Company.
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES:
(Rs. in million)
|
As at March 31 |
As at June 30 2000 |
||||
|
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Fixed assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Block |
0.01 |
10.20 |
12.39 |
12.81 |
47.18 |
55.90 |
Less :Accumulated Depreciation |
0.00 |
2.80 |
6.01 |
9.20 |
18.72 |
22.05 |
Net Block |
0.01 |
7.40 |
6.38 |
3.61 |
28.46 |
33.85 |
Capital Work in progress |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1.46 |
5.36 |
|
0.01 |
7.40 |
6.38 |
3.61 |
29.92 |
39.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Investments |
- |
- |
1.37 |
1.96 |
34.60 |
74.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Current Assets, Loans and Advances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
- |
0.60 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Sundry Debtors |
0.50 |
2.27 |
2.81 |
2.34 |
42.63 |
79.41 |
Cash and Bank Balances |
0.03 |
1.87 |
1.49 |
28.54 |
15.83 |
28.21 |
Loans and Advances |
0.02 |
0.87 |
1.83 |
4.37 |
12.67 |
30.28 |
|
0.55 |
5.61 |
6.13 |
35.25 |
71.13 |
137.90 |
D. Liabilities and Provisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured Loans |
- |
3.22 |
3.24 |
- |
16.79 |
36.77 |
Unsecured Loans |
0.46 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Current Liabilities |
0.05 |
1.58 |
1.70 |
0.94 |
14.85 |
51.95 |
Provisions |
- |
0.02 |
0.63 |
0.28 |
1.46 |
1.48 |
|
0.51 |
4.82 |
5.57 |
1.22 |
33.10 |
90.20 |
E. Networth |
0.05 |
8.19 |
8.31 |
39.60 |
102.55 |
161.28 |
F. Represented by: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Share Capital |
0.01 |
10.59 |
11.62 |
25.71 |
32.81 |
92.84 |
2. Reserves & Surplus |
0.05 |
(2.40) |
1.04 |
27.18 |
69.52 |
68.44 |
|
0.06 |
8.19 |
12.66 |
52.89 |
102.33 |
161.28 |
Less : Debit balance in Profit and Loss Account |
- |
- |
- |
(13.29) |
- |
- |
Less : Miscellaneous expenses not written off or adjusted |
(0.01) |
- |
(4.35) |
- |
- |
- |
3.Share application money pending allotment |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.22 |
- |
Net worth |
0.05 |
8.19 |
8.31 |
39.60 |
102.55 |
161.28 |
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of preparation of financial statements
The financial statements have been prepared under the historical-cost convention in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, on the accrual basis of accounting and comply with the mandatory accounting standards and statements issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.
Revenue recognition
Revenue from software development on a time-and-material basis is recognized based on software developed, and billed to clients as per the terms of specific contracts. For fixed price contracts, revenue is recognized based on the milestones achieved, as specified in the contracts, on a percentage of completion basis. Revenue from the sale of software products developed is recognized when the sale has been completed with the passing of title. Interest on deployment of surplus funds is recognized using the time-proportion method, based on interest rates implicit in the transaction. Revenue from the sale of Special Import Licences is recognized when the licences are actually sold.
Expenditure
Expenses are accounted on accrual basis and provision is made for all known losses and liabilities.
Fixed assets
Fixed assets are stated at the cost of acquisition less accumulated depreciation. Relevant incidental costs are capitalized till the assets are ready to be put to use.
Depreciation
Depreciation on all fixed assets is provided using the straight-line method based on useful lives as estimated by the Management. Individual assets costing less than Rs. 5,000/- are depreciated in full in the year of purchase. In respect of additions/deletions of fixed assets, depreciation is being charged on a pro-rata basis from/till the date of such addition/deletion. The Management’s estimate of useful lives of the various fixed assets are given below:
Computers and Accessories |
3 years |
Software and Intellectual Property |
1 to 3 years |
Furniture and Fixtures |
5 years |
Other Equipment |
5 years |
Improvements to Leasehold Premises |
5 years |
Electrical Installation |
5 years |
Generator |
5 years |
Contracts in progress
The Company incurs cost on software development contracts. Unbilled costs on contracts are accumulated and carried forward as contracts-in-progress until they are matched against revenues recognised.
Foreign currency transactions
In the case of sales made to clients outside India, income is accounted on the basis of the exchange rate as on the date of the transaction. Expenditure in foreign currency is accounted for at the conversion rates prevalent when such expenditure is incurred. Where disbursements are made out of a foreign currency bank account, all transactions during the month are reported at a rate, which approximates the actual monthly rate.
The Company recognises all transaction/translation gains and losses in the profit and loss account except those relating to liabilities incurred for the acquisition of fixed assets, which are adjusted to the cost of the respective assets.
Current assets and current liabilities denominated in foreign currency are translated at the exchange rate prevalent at the date of the balance sheet. All exchange gains/losses are accounted for in the profit and loss account.
Investments
Long-term investments are carried at cost, and provision is made to recognise permanent decline, if any, in the value of such investments. The investment in the subsidiary is carried at the original rupee cost.
Retirement Benefits
All employees receive benefits from a provident fund, which is a defined contribution plan. Both the employee and employer make monthly contributions to the plan equal to 12% of the eligible employees’ salary, which are remitted to the Government’s provident fund. The Company has no further obligations under this plan beyond its monthly contributions. A provision for gratuity is made on the basis of actuarial valuation.
Taxation
Provision for taxation is made in accordance with the Income-tax laws prevailing at the time of the relevant assessment years.
Agewise analysis of Sundry Debtors as on June 30, 2000:
(Rs. in million)
Period in days |
As at June 30, 2000 |
Due from Related Party (Note 1) |
0-30 |
51.52 |
19.75 |
31-90 |
27.89 |
1.76 |
91-180 |
- |
|
181-365 |
- |
|
More than 365 days |
- |
|
Total |
79.41 |
21.51 |
Less: Provision for doubtful debts |
Nil |
Nil |
Total |
79.41 |
21.51 |
Note 1:
The following are the dues from related parties:
(Rs in million)
Name of the Party |
As at June 30, 2000 |
Nature of Relationship |
Average number of days outstanding |
Jam Cracker Inc (formerly Vital Tone Inc) |
13.30 |
A company in which Mr. K. B. Chandrasekhar, Director is interested. |
1 day |
Reez. Com |
8.21 |
A company in which Mr. K. B. Chandrasekhar, Director is interested. |
7 days |
Total |
21.51 |
|
- |
Major Debtors of the Company (more than 10% of the outstanding debts as on June 30, 2000)
Name of the Debtor |
Nature of Relationship |
(Rs. in million) |
Asera Inc. |
Customer |
14.29 |
Jam Cracker Inc (formerly known as Vital Tone Inc.) |
A related party customer (A Company in which Mr K. B. Chandrasekhar, Director is interested) |
13.30 |
Viador Inc. |
Customer |
10.51 |
Apexon Inc. |
Customer |
9.42 |
Age wise analysis of Loans and Advances as on June 30, 2000:
(Rs. in million)
Period in days |
As at 30 June 2000 |
Due from Related Party(Note 1) |
0-30 |
4.09 |
14.28 |
31-90 |
17.53 |
0.91 |
91-180 |
4.19 |
- |
181-365 |
1.45 |
- |
More than 365 days |
3.02 |
- |
Total |
30.28 |
15.19 |
Less : Provision for doubtful loans and advances |
Nil |
Nil |
Total |
30.28 |
15.19 |
Note 1:
The following are the dues from related parties:
(Rs in million)
Name of the Party |
As at 30 June 2000 |
Nature of Relationship |
Nature of Transaction |
Average number of days outstanding |
Aztec Software and Technology Services Private Limited Employees Welfare Trust. - a trust formed for the administration and implementation of the Company’s 1998 Stock Options Plan (India). |
13.39 |
A Trust in which Mr. S. Parthasarathy and Mr.M Chandrasekaran, Directors are trustees. |
Interest Free Loan |
53 days |
Aztec Software Inc |
1.80 |
A Wholly Owned Subsidiary |
Travel related expense receivable. |
45 days |
Total |
15.19 |
|
|
|
Major Loans and Advances of the Company (more than 10% of the outstanding loans and advances as June 30, 2000
Name of the Party |
Nature of Relationship |
(Rs. in million) |
Aztec Software and Technology Services Private Limited Employees Welfare Trust.-a trust formed for the administration and implementation of the Company’s 1998 Stock Options Plan (India). |
A Trust in which Mr. S Parthasarathy and Mr. M. Chandrasekaran, Directors are trustees. |
13.39 |
Lease Deposit for Office Building |
Lessor |
7.30 |
FINANCIAL RATIOS
|
30 June 2000 (Adjusted for dilution – Note8) |
30 June 2000 |
31 March 2000 |
31 March 1999 |
||||
|
Pre-split |
Post-split |
Pre-split |
Post-split |
Pre-split |
Post-split |
Pre-split |
Post-split |
Basic Earnings per share (EPS) (Rs.) |
4.46 |
1.34 |
4.88 |
1.47 |
12.48 |
3.74 |
(5.57) |
(1.67) |
Net Asset Value per share (Rs.) |
15.86 |
4.76 |
17.37 |
5.21 |
31.26 |
9.38 |
15.40 |
4.62 |
Return on net worth (%) |
28.11 |
28.11 |
28.11 |
28.11 |
39.93 |
39.93 |
(36.18) |
(36.18) |
Number of equity shares of Rs. 10 / Rs. 3 each |
|
|
|
|
||||
Pre-split |
10,168,536 |
9,283,836 |
3,280,611 |
2,571,301 |
||||
Post-split |
33,895,120 |
30,946,120 |
10,935,370 |
8,571,003 |
|
31 March 1998 |
31 March 1997 |
31 March 1996 |
|||
|
Pre-split |
Post-split |
Pre-split |
Post-split |
Pre-split |
Post-split |
Basic Earnings per share (EPS) (Rs.) |
3.48 |
1.05 |
(2.31) |
(0.69) |
83.33 |
25.50 |
Net Asset Value per share (Rs.) |
7.15 |
2.15 |
7.73 |
2.32 |
83.33 |
25.00 |
Return on net worth (%) |
48.74 |
48.74 |
29.91 |
29.91 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
Number of equity shares of Rs. 10 / Rs. 3 each |
|
|
|
|||
Pre-split |
1,162,183 |
1,058,974 |
600 |
|||
Post-split |
3,873,943 |
3,529,913 |
2,000 |
Notes:
CHANGES IN THE ACCOUNTING POLICIES
There has been no change in the accounting policies in the last three years except the following:
Intellectual Property Rights
In the financial year 1996-97, the value of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) capitalized amounting to Rs. 7.7 million was not depreciated based on an expert opinion. However in the financial year 1997-98, the accounting policy has been changed and the IPR were amortised in three equal instalments commencing from the financial year 1996-97. Had this amortisation policy been followed in the financial year 1996-97, the depreciation charge for the year would have been higher by Rs. 2.57 million, Net Profit for the year amounting to Rs. 0.14 million would have become a Net Loss for the year amounting to Rs. 2.43 million and the net book value of fixed assets would have been lower by Rs. 2.57 million.
MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION
(Rs million)
Quarter ended |
Year ended |
||||
30.6.2000 |
31.3.2000 |
31.3.99 |
31.3.98 |
31.3.97 |
|
Sales |
138.35 |
136.91 |
13.853 |
19.121 |
5.635 |
% Increase/ (Decrease) over previous year |
NA |
888% |
-28% |
239% |
1026% |
Other Income |
.004 |
0.857 |
0.615 |
0.014 |
0.023 |
Total Income (Gross earnings) |
138.35 |
137.767 |
14.469 |
19.135 |
5.658 |
% Increase/ (Decrease) over previous year |
NA |
852% |
-24% |
238% |
1030% |
Personnel Expenses |
21.24 |
35.658 |
8.95 |
6.68 |
2.258 |
Administrative and other expenses |
66.87 |
48.874 |
12.005 |
8.072 |
3.405 |
Finance Charges |
1.461 |
1.437 |
0.264 |
0.64 |
0.222 |
Depreciation |
3.328 |
10.396 |
3.226 |
6.02 |
0.234 |
Increase / Decrease in inventory |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.6 |
-0.6 |
Expenses |
92.899 |
96.365 |
24.445 |
22.012 |
5.519 |
% Increase/ (Decrease) over previous year |
NA |
294% |
11% |
299% |
1133% |
Less: product development expenses, deferred |
0 |
0 |
1.436 |
4.348 |
0 |
92.899 |
96.365 |
23.010 |
17.664 |
5.52 |
|
Add: Product Development expenses, written off |
0 |
0 |
5.784 |
0 |
0 |
92.899 |
96.365 |
28.794 |
17.664 |
5.52 |
|
Net profit / Loss before taxation |
45.452 |
41.402 |
-14.325 |
1.471 |
0.139 |
Provision for taxation |
0.002 |
0.35 |
0 |
0 |
0.02 |
Under provision for taxation in the previous year |
0 |
0 |
0.0002 |
0 |
0 |
Net profit after Taxation (PAT) |
45.450 |
41.052 |
-14.325 |
1.471 |
0.119 |
% Increase/ (Decrease) over previous year |
NA |
387% |
-1073% |
1134 |
125 |
Adjustments as per SEBI Guidelines |
0 |
1.472 |
-0.677 |
2.038 |
-2.833 |
Revised PAT after SEBI adjustments |
45.450 |
42.524 |
-15.002 |
3.509 |
-2.714 |
Analysis of the results
Quarter ended June 30, 2000
Significant events during the Quarter
During the quarter, the Company made further progress as a solutions provider in the internet infrastructure segment. The Company has managed to sign on six new customers in the quarter. The number of employees increased significantly from 126 to 181.
Gross Revenues
In the period ended June 30, 2000, the Company’s gross revenues were Rs. 138.35 million. This was more than the revenues recorded during the whole of last year (1999-00). This was made possible by the increase in the number of customers and the increase in the average billing per customer.
Personnel Costs
The expenses on personnel for the quarter were Rs. 21.238 million. The ratio of personnel expenses to total revenues fell to 15.35%. This was because the salary of the employees working in the US was borne by the US subsidiary. So, the personnel costs for the quarter are not comparable to the costs incurred in the earlier accounting periods.
Gross Profits
The gross profits for the quarter were Rs. 117.11 million. The gross profit margin was 84.64% as against a gross margin of 74% in the previous year. This increase was mainly due to the decrease in the personnel costs, the reasons for which are discussed above.
Administrative, general and selling costs
The administrative and other expenses were Rs. 66.871 million. This figure is not comparable with the figures for the previous accounting periods because the company has entered into a new arrangement with the subsidiary wherein the Company pays a sales commission to the subsidiary. The company has also started reimbursing the subsidiary for the engineering personnel employed by it. These two costs show up in the administrative, general and selling costs for the quarter. Consequently, the ratio of administrative expenses to total revenues rose to 48.33% from 35.47% recorded during the previous year.
Depreciation
Depreciation for the quarter was Rs. 3.328 million.
Net Profits
The profit (before taxation) was Rs. 45.452 million. The provision for taxation was Rs. 0.002 million. The Net profit was Rs. 45.450 against the profit of Rs. 42.524 million (after adjustments) recorded in the whole of last year.
Financial year 1999-2000 against financial year 1998-99
Significant events during the year
During the year, the Company made major headway as a solutions provider in the internet infrastructure segment. In spite of this being the first year of operations in this segment, the Company managed to sign on a number of new customers during the year. The number of employees increased significantly from 27 to 126.
Gross Revenues
Between the period ended March 31, 2000 and the period ended March 31, 1999, the Company’s gross revenues increased significantly by 888% i.e. from Rs. 13.85 million to Rs. 136.9 million. The growth was made possible largely by the significant advances made by the Company in providing technology solutions to some of the top Application Service Providers and other clients operating in the e-commerce domain.
Personnel Costs
The expenses on personnel grew at a much smaller pace from Rs. 8.95 million to Rs. 35.66 million. This was mainly due to the increase in the number of personnel from 26 (March 1999) to 127 (March 2000). More importantly, the ratio of the personnel costs to total revenues fell from 61.8% to 25.9%.
Gross Profits
The slower rate of growth in personnel costs as compared to the rate of growth in revenues resulted in the gross profits improving significantly from Rs. 5.52 million to Rs. 102.11 million. The gross profit margin increased from 38% in 1998-99 to 74% in 1999-2000.
Administrative, general and selling costs
The administrative and other expenses grew from Rs. 12.005 million to Rs. 48.873 million. The increase was pretty much in line with the increase in the number of employees. However, the ratio of administrative expenses to total revenues fell from 82.97% in the previous year to 35.47%. The fall in this ratio was partly due to the increasing economies of scale.
Depreciation
Depreciation went up from Rs. 3.226 million to Rs. 10.396 million, on the back of an increase in gross block from Rs. 12.8 million to Rs. 47.1 million.
Net Profits
The lower rate of growth in the expenses as compared to the growth in revenues, led to a significant improvement in the net profits. The Company registered a turnaround by registering a profit (before taxation) of Rs. 41.4 million as against a loss of Rs. 14.3 million in the previous year. The provision for taxation was Rs. 0.35 million, resulting in a profit after tax of Rs. 41.052 million as against a loss of Rs. 14.325 million in the previous year. The net profit (after adjustments, as per SEBI guidelines) went up to Rs. 42.524 million as against a loss (after adjustments, as per SEBI guidelines) of Rs. 15.002 million registered during the previous year.
Financial year 1998-99 against financial year 1997-98
Significant events during the year
During the year the company successfully launched its product JPACT. Also during the year the Company decided to shift its operations to a more spacious location in Bangalore to accommodate the expected growth in the future.
Gross Revenues
Between the year ended March 31, 1999 and year ended March 31, 1998 the Company’s gross revenues registered a fall of 24% from Rs. 19.135 million in 1997-98 to Rs. 14.469 million in 1998-99. This was because the Company’s major focus was towards development of its product- Jpact.
Personnel costs
The personnel costs of the Company grew from Rs. 6.679 million to Rs. 8.95 million, backed by a growth in the number of employees from 16 to 26. The ratio of personnel costs to revenues rose from 34.9% to 82.9%. This was mainly due to the fall in the revenues.
Gross margin
The gross profits of the Company fell from Rs. 12.455 million to Rs. 5.518 million. The gross margin fell to 38% from 65% in the previous year.
Administrative, general and selling expenses
The administrative and other expenses grew from Rs. 8.072 million to Rs. 12.005 million. The increase was in keeping with the increase in the number of people employed by the Company. The ratio of these expenses to revenues went up from 42% in the previous year to 83%. This was mainly due to the fall in revenues.
Depreciation
Depreciation charges fell from Rs. 6.02 million to Rs. 3.226 million. The value of the intellectual property owned by the Company to the tune of Rs. 2.567 million was completely written off during the year. Also, the Company, as a matter of prudence, changed the period of amortizing the cost of product development from three years to one year. This resulted in an additional charge to the tune of Rs. 3.9 million being recognized in 1998-99.
Net Profits
The fall in revenue coupled with the increase in costs, along with the one time additional charge- corresponding to the write off of the value of the intellectual property owned by the Company- led to the Company registering a fall in its net profits compared to the 1997-98 figures. The Company registered a net loss of Rs. 14.325 million during 1998-99 as against a net profit of Rs. 1.47 million in 1997-98. The Company registered a net loss (after adjustments, as per SEBI guidelines) of Rs. 15.002 million during 1998-99 as against a net profit (after adjustments, as per SEBI guidelines) of Rs. 3.509 million in 1997-98.
Financial year 1997-1998 against financial year 1996-97
Significant events during the year
During the year the company completed the building of its first product JPACT. Also, during the year the Company set up a subsidiary in the US, Aztec Software Inc. The subsidiary was set up to market and sell the product in the world market. During the year, the company successfully renewed its contract with Microsoft Corporation, USA.
Gross Revenues
Between the year ended March 31,1998 and year ended March 31, 1997 the Company’s gross revenues increased by 239% from Rs. 5.6 million to Rs. 19.1 million.
Personnel costs
The personnel costs of the Company increased from Rs. 2.258 million to Rs. 6.679 million. This was in keeping with the increase in the number of people employed by the Company, which went up to 16, from 10 in the previous year. The ratio of personnel costs to revenues registered a fall from 39.9% to 34.9%.
Gross profits
The gross profits for the year went up more than 250%, from Rs. 3.4 million to Rs. 12.455 million. The gross margin also improved from 60% to 65%.
Administrative general and selling expenses
The administrative and other expenses increased, at a slower rate, from Rs. 3.405 million to Rs. 8.072 million.
Depreciation
The depreciation increased substantially from Rs. 0.234 million to Rs. 6.02 million, primarily because of a charge of Rs. 5.133 million for depreciation of intellectual property held by the company. There was no similar charge in the previous year.
Net Profits
The slower rate of growth in expenses compared to the growth in revenues resulted in the net profits of the Company showing a growth of around 11 times, growing from Rs. 0.119 million in 1996-97 to Rs. 1.471 million in 1997-98. The net profit for the year (after adjustments, as per SEBI guidelines) was Rs. 3.509 million as against a net loss (after adjustments, as per SEBI guidelines) of Rs. 2.714 million in 1997-98.
Summing up
During the period 1996-97 to 1999-2000 (Four financial years)
1. Unusual or infrequent events or transactions
There have been no significant or infrequent transactions.
2. Significant economic changes
There are no significant economic changes that materially affect or are likely to affect the income from continuing operations.
3. Known trends or Uncertainties
There are no known trends or uncertainties that have or had or are expected to have a material adverse impact on revenue or income from continuing operations.
4. Future relationship between costs and revenues
There are no known factors, which will affect the future relationship between the costs, and revenues, which will have a material impact on the operations and finances of the Company.
5. Total turnover of each major industry segment in which the Company operates
The Company derives its entire turnover from Software development and services.
6. New Products or business segments
The Company has entered the business of e-engineering solutions for Application Service Providers and other players in B2B space in FY 2000. The Company is also making efforts to sell software components from its ‘IP library’.
7. Seasonality of business
The business of the Company is not seasonal.
8. Dependence on single or few suppliers / customers
The Company derives a significant part of its revenues from its top five customers. The revenue generated by top 5 customers during the financial year 1999-2000 is Rs.101.76 million, which constitutes 74.33% of the total turnover for the year. The revenue generated by top 5 customers during the first quarter of financial year 2000-2001 is Rs.106.18 million, which constitutes 76.75% of the total turnover for the period.
9. Competitive Conditions
The Company expects the competition to intensify from other Indian as well as foreign IT consulting organizations. For Further details please refer to the para on Competition on page [· ].
Save as stated elsewhere in the Prospectus, no circumstances have arisen since the date of the last financial statement as disclosed in the Prospectus which materially and adversely affect or is likely to affect the trading or profitability of the Company, or the value of its assets, or its ability to pay its liability within the next twelve months.
Save as stated elsewhere in the Prospectus, there is no subsequent development after the Auditors’ Report which will have a bearing on reserves, profits, EPS and book value.
CAPITALIZATION STATEMENT
(Rs. in million)
|
Pre-Issue as at |
Adjusted for |
June 30, 2000 |
Present Issue (Note 1) |
|
Loan funds: |
|
|
Short term debt |
7.77 |
|
Long term debt |
29.00 |
|
Shareholders funds: |
|
|
Share capital |
92.84 |
|
Reserves |
68.44 |
|
Total |
161.28 |
|
Long term debt / equity |
0.18 |
|
Note:
VII. Y2K Readiness
The Company has not faced any disruption during Y2K changeover period. The Company had taken the necessary steps to mitigate the risks associated with Y2K. The Company has replaced / upgraded all computers and related hardware with Y2K compliant computers and related hardware. New Y2K compliant software has replaced the old software. Hence, all the software and hardware of the Company are Y2K compliant.
VIII. STOCK MARKET DATA FOR EQUITY SHARES OF THE COMPANY
This being the initial public offering of the Company, the shares of the Company are not listed on the stock exchanges.
IX. BASIS FOR ISSUE PRICE
The Offer Price would be determined by the Company in consultation with the BRLM, on the basis of assessment of market demand for the offered Equity Shares by way of Book Building.
Qualitative Factors
Quantitative Factors
1. Adjusted Earning Per Share (EPS)
Year |
EPS (Rs.) |
Weight |
|
|
|
1997-98 |
1.05 |
1.00 |
1998-99 |
-1.67 |
2.00 |
1999-00 |
3.74 |
3.00 |
Q1 2000-01 Annualized |
5.36 |
4.00 |
Weighted Average |
3.03 |
|
2. Price/Earning Ratio (P/E) in relation to Issue Price of Rs. [· ]
Based on Q1 2000-2001 Annualized EPS on pre-issue capital of 5.36: [· ]
Industry P/E *
i) Highest |
669.4 |
ii) Lowest |
4.5 |
iii) Average Industry Composite |
92.0 |
* Based on "Capital Market" Vol. XV/12 dated September 03, 2000, Category segment "Computers – Software – Large"
3. Return on Net Worth (RONW)
Year |
RONW (%) |
Weight |
|
|
|
1997-98 |
48.74 |
1.00 |
1998-99 |
-36.18 |
2.00 |
1999-00 |
39.93 |
3.00 |
Q1 2000-01 Annualized |
112.44 |
4.00 |
Weighted Average |
54.59 |
|
* Annualized
4. Minimum Return on Total Net Worth after Issue needed to maintain EPS at 5.36 is [· ]
5. Net Asset Value (NAV)
As at June 30, 2000 on a fully diluted pre-issue capital: 4.76
(a) After Issue - [· ]
(b) Issue Price - [· ]
The Issue price of Rs. [· ] has been determined through the book building process on the basis of the demand from the investors.
X. PARTICULARS REGARDING PREVIOUS CAPITAL ISSUES DURING THE LAST FIVE YEARS
The Company has not come out with any Public or Rights Issue since its inception.
XI. COMPANIES UNDER THE SAME MANAGEMENT
There are no listed companies under the same management within the meaning of Section 370(1B) of the Companies Act, 1956. The following companies are the companies under the same management within the meaning of Section 370(1B) of the Companies Act, 1956:
XII. MECHANISM EVOLVED FOR REDRESSAL OF INVESTOR GRIEVANCES
Investor grievances will be settled expeditiously and satisfactorily by the Company. The agreement between the Company and the Registrar will provide for retention of records with the Registrar for a period of at least one year from the last date of dispatch of Letters of Allotment/Share Certificates/Refund Orders to enable the investors to approach the Registrar for redressal of their grievances.
All grievances relating to the Issue may be addressed to the Registrar to the Issue, MCS Limited, giving full details such as name, address of the applicant, number of shares applied for, amount paid on application and the bank branch/collection center where the application was submitted.
Disposal of Investor Grievances
The average time required by the Company/Registrar for the redressal of routine investor grievances shall be seven working days from the date of receipt of the complaint. In case of non-routine complaints and where external agencies are involved, the Company/Registrar would strive to redress these complaints as expeditiously as possible.
XIII. OUTSTANDING LITIGATION/CRIMINAL PROSECUTION, DEFAULTS AND MATERIAL DEVELOPMENTS
There are no outstanding/pending litigations, suits, criminal/civil prosecutions, proceedings initiated for offence (including past cases, economic offences, etc.) irrespective of whether specified in paragraph (I) of Part 1 of Schedule XIII of the Companies Act, 1956) and litigations for tax liabilities against the Company, its subsidiaries and Companies promoted by the same Promoters and there are no defaults/non payment/overdues of statutory dues, institutional/bank dues and dues towards holders of debentures, bonds and fixed deposits and arrears of preference shares, etc., other than unclaimed liabilities of the Company, its Subsidiaries and Companies promoted by same Promoters.
Litigations against Directors / Promoters
There are no pending litigations disputes, defaults, non-payment of statutory dues, criminal/civil prosecutions, proceedings initiated for economic offences (including past cases), disciplinary action taken by the SEBI/ Stock Exchanges against the directors/promoters of the Company.
There are no cases of pending litigations, defaults, etc. in respect of companies/firms/ventures with which promoters were associated in the past but are no longer associated and where their name still continues to be associated with particular litigation(s).
MATERIAL DEVELOPMENTS
Save as stated elsewhere in the Prospectus, since the date of last published audited statement, no material developments have taken place that will materially affect the performance or prospects of the Company.
XIV. RISK FACTORS AND MANAGEMENT PERCEPTION THEREOF
Internal Factors
Management Perception: The Company believes that it has the professional expertise to estimate its capital expenditure plan. In-house qualified and experienced team of professionals has worked out the fund requirement. At this time the Company does not foresee any borrowing requirements under this plan and thus has not approached any bank or financial institution for appraisal.
Management Perception: Based on Company’s historical high rate of growth and its ability to manage such growth and attract qualified personnel in the past, the Company believes that it can manage its growth. The Company has recruited, and is in the process of recruiting senior people to effectively manage its growth. The Company is also implementing internal control and quality control processes to ensure the quality of its services. However, no assurance can be given that the Company will be successful in meeting new challenges arising out of the growth in its business.
Management Perception: Since inception only one of its key managerial personnel has resigned. The Company has in place an informal work atmosphere, an intense technology focus, competitive salaries, performance based reward system and a generous stock option plan. The Company believes that these measures should enable the Company to attract new talent as well as retain its existing talent base. In the year 1999-00, the employee attrition rate for the Company was 6.5%.
Management Perception: The Company has expertise in some fundamental areas of technology like Database internals, Warehousing and messaging. This expertise ensures that the Company can adapt to changes in the programming tools easily. The Technology Development team of the Company lead by its CTO is on proactive look-out for replacement technologies. Also, the fact that the Company works at the cutting edge of technology ensures that the Company is in constant touch with the very latest trends in evolving industry standards, making the process of adapting to changes in them easier.
Management Perception: The Company has made significant progress in signing on new clients and thus reducing the dependence on a few clients. In the quarter ended June 30, 2000, the Company signed 6 new clients.
Management Perception: The Company gets constant feedback from clients on the quality of the solutions delivered, thus preventing a situation wherein a contract is terminated prematurely. The Company has processes in place to ensure proper effort estimation and prevent cost overruns in case of fixed price contracts. Due to effective quality control measures, so far the Company has neither faced any premature unilateral termination of its projects nor any material cost overruns.
Management Perception: The Company relies on a combination of non-disclosure and other contractual agreements and copyright, trademark and trade secret laws to protect its proprietary rights in software and other IP tools. The Company also requires its professionals and contractual workers to enter into non-disclosure and assignment of rights arrangements to limit access to and distribution of proprietary information. Although IPRs are essential for competitive advantage, the Company gets only a small percentage of its revenues (about 5%) from direct sales/license of its IP components. The Company will try and get patents to protect its IPRs, wherever possible, but no assurance can be given that that the steps taken by the Company in this regard will be adequate to deter misappropriation of proprietary information or that the Company will be able to detect unauthorized use.
Management Perception: The Company is evaluating various alternatives for potential acquisition targets or alliance partners. The Company recognizes the challenge involved in carrying out and completing a successful acquisition and thus would analyze the strategic fit of the potential target. The Company will employ experience and talent (both from within the Company and independent experts) to ensure that the acquisitions or alliances are completed successfully.
Management Perception: The Company would seek to ensure that the requirements of funds are met in line with the acquisition needs. As the Company currently has a low debt, it can potentially leverage itself to meet any additional funds requirement.
Management Perception: The debt mentioned above is a part of the normal business activities of the Company. Out of this Rs. 13.3 million have already been recovered by July 21, 2000.
Management Perception: The Company is in the process of identifying suitable locations for the proposed development center and Phase II of expansion. The Company will apply for the necessary regulatory approvals once the possession of the premises is taken. Since the Company is yet to identify the new premises, it is not in a position to list out all the regulatory approvals that would be required for the new premises. The markets for the equipments for which the orders are not placed are very competitive, with many suppliers. Majority of equipment is indigenously available. So the Company does not foresee any difficulty in procuring the equipments as and when the need arises.
Management Perception: The Company has entered into an Master Services Agreement with Aztec Software, Inc by which the Company pays commission to Aztec Software, Inc for the services rendered by it on behalf of the Company. This steady stream of revenue is expected to improve the financial condition of Aztec Software, Inc. Losses of e4e Holdings Ventures are not likely to affect Aztec.
Date
|
Name of Shareholder
|
No. of Shares |
Face value
|
Issue Price Rs. |
18/10/99 |
e4e Holdings Limited |
2,364,367 |
3.0 |
9.2 |
03/05/00 |
Chandrasekar.S |
14,490 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
03/05/00 |
Shankar Mahalingam |
3,710 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
03/05/00 |
Krishnaprasad |
7,263 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
03/05/00 |
Bharat Sethuraman |
10,893 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
23/05/00 |
Aztec Software & Technology Services Limited Employees' Welfare Trust |
4,493,334 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
23/05/00 |
Venkat Subramania Raju |
8,000 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
07/09/00 |
Aztec Software & Technology Services Limited Employees' Welfare Trust |
1,500,000 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
External Factors
Management Perception: The Company’s capabilities in technology and project delivery and the fact that the Company has built up IP library over the years will protect its revenues and margins even in face of new entrants into the market. Please refer to page [· ] on Competition.
Management Perception: The GoI has identified Software as a major thrust area for Exports and incentives are being provided to encourage this industry. The Company believes that it is unlikely that the GoI would initiate any policy, which could be detrimental to the growth of this sector in near future.
Management Perception: The Company works at the cutting edge of technology and is constantly exposed to the developments in technology. The Company works as a co-development partner with some product companies like Microsoft, Viador and Embarcadero. This ensures that the Company is exposed to futuristic technology, thereby mitigating to certain extent, the threat of obsolescence. The Company also seeks to improve the skill set of its employees through training and upgrades its infrastructure to keep pace with the technological needs. The Company is setting-up Aztec Learning Center for the purpose of training.
Management perception: Exchange rate fluctuation is an attendant business risk for all software exporters. Historically the dollar has been stronger than rupee.
Notes
Name of the Party |
Nature of relationship |
Subject matter of contract |
Expenditure /Income |
Amount (Rs. in millions) |
Jam Cracker Inc (formerly known as Vital Tone inc) |
A company in which Mr K B Chandrasekhar, Director is interested |
Software Development Services |
Income |
47.67 |
Reez.Com |
A company in which Mr K B Chandrasekhar, Director is interested |
Software Development Services |
Income |
8.21 |
Aztec Software Inc |
Wholly Owned Subsidiary |
Consultancy Charges – On site |
Expenditure |
20.62 |
Aztec Software Inc |
Wholly Owned Subsidiary |
Agency Commission |
Expenditure |
16.86 |
Aztec Software Inc |
Wholly Owned Subsidiary |
Accommodation /travel related expenses payable |
Expenditure |
4.88 |
Aztec Software and Technology Services Private Limited Employees Welfare Trust. |
A Trust formed for the administration and implementation of the Company’s 1998 Stock Options Plan (India) |
Interest Free Loan |
- |
13.39 |
Name of the Party |
Nature of relationship |
Subject matter of contract |
Expenditure /Income |
Amount (Rs. in millions) |
M. Chandrasekaran |
Director |
Professional fees |
Expenditure |
0.25 |
Aztec Software Inc |
Wholly Owned Subsidiary |
Professional charges and travel related expenses |
Expenditure |
9.31 |
Jam Cracker Inc (formerly known as Vital Tone inc) |
A company in which Mr K B Chandrasekhar, Director is interested |
Software Development Services |
Income |
45.60 |
PART II
A. GENERAL INFORMATION:
CONSENTS
Consents in writing of: (a) the Directors, the Company Secretary, the Auditors, Legal Advisors, Bankers to the Company and Bankers to the Issue; and (b) Book Running Lead Managers to the Issue, Syndicate Members, Escrow Collection Bankers and Registrars to the Issue to act in their respective capacities, have been obtained and filed along with a copy of the Prospectus with the Registrar of Companies, as required under Section 60 of the Act and such consents have not been withdrawn up to the time of delivery of the Offer Document for registration.
M/s. BSR & Co., Chartered Accountants, Auditors of the Company, have given their written consent to the inclusion of their Report in the form and context in which it appears in the Draft Offer Document and such consent and report have not been withdrawn up to the time of delivery of the Draft Offer Document for registration.
E.S. Gopala Krishnan Gupta, Chartered Accountant has given his written consent for inclusion of Export Obligation Certificate in the Draft Offer Document.
EXPERT OPINION
Save as stated elsewhere in the Draft Offer Document, the Company has not obtained any expert opinions.
CHANGES IN BOARD OF DIRECTORS/AUDITORS DURING THE LAST THREE YEARS AND REASONS THEREOF
Changes in Directors
The changes that took place in the Board of Directors since April 1997 are as follows:
Name |
Date Of Appointment |
Date Of Resignation |
Reason |
V. Swaminathan |
|
August 25, 1997 |
Resigned |
Anuradha Parthasarathy |
|
November 9, 1998 |
Resigned |
Thomas Joseph |
|
November 9, 1998 |
Resigned |
K.B. Chandrasekhar |
December 23, 1998 |
|
Appointed |
Sunil Gulati |
January 20, 2000 |
|
Appointed as Additional Director |
S Parthasarathy |
|
April 1, 2000 |
Resigned as Managing Director but continued as a Director |
Somashankar Das |
May 3, 2000 |
|
Appointed as Additional Director |
Sunil Gulati |
May 30, 2000 |
|
Appointed as Director |
Somashankar Das |
May 30, 2000 |
|
Appointed as Director |
Changes in Auditors
There has been no change in the Auditors of the Company in the last three years except for the following:
For the year 1998-99 Members of the Company appointed BSR & Co., Chartered Accountants, as Auditors of the Company in place of S. Madhavan & Co., Chartered Accountants, who were the Auditors of the Company since its inception.
AUTHORITY FOR THE ISSUE
The Issue has been authorised by a Special Resolution passed, pursuant to Section 81(1A) of the Act, at the Extra Ordinary General Meeting of the Members of the Company held on May 11, 2000, and resolution passed by the Board of Directors at its meeting held on May 15, 2000.
PROCEDURE AND TIME SCHEDULE FOR ALLOTMENT AND ISSUE OF SHARE CERTIFICATES
The Company reserves at its sole, absolute and uncontrolled discretion and without assigning any reason thereof, the right to accept or reject any bid/application in whole or in part. In case a bid/application is rejected in full, the whole of the application money, will be refunded to the bidder/applicant. In case bid/application is rejected in part, the excess application money will be refunded to the bidder/applicant within 15 days of the closing of the subscription list for the Fixed Price Portion or within 15 days of the Bid Closure Date in case of the Book Built Portion. The Company, will allot the equity shares for Book Built and Fixed Price Portion within 15 days from the Offer Closing Date for the Book Built and Fixed Price Portion respectively and shall pay interest @ 15% p.a. for the delayed period if the allotment is not made and/or the refund orders are not dispatched within 15 days from the said dates. The Company shall ensure that all steps for the completion of the necessary formalities for listing and commencement of trading at all the Stock Exchanges where the Equity Shares are proposed to be listed are taken within seven working days of finalization and adoption of the Basis of Allotment for the Fixed Price Portion.
UTILISATION OF ISSUE PROCEEDS
Pending the utilisation of the Public Issue amount for the objects of the issue, the funds would be invested in any manner as the Board may deem fit.
DISPOSAL OF APPLICATIONS AND APPLICATIONS MONEY
The Company shall dispatch Share Certificate(s)/Refund Order/cancelled Stockinvest and give demat credit to the Beneficiary Account with Depository Participants and submit the listing documents to the Stock Exchange within two working days of finalisation and adoption of the Basis of Allotment for Fixed Price Portion. The Company will dispatch Letter(s) of Allotment, Share Certificate(s), Letter(s) of Regret, cancelled Stockinvest and Refund Orders, if any, in excess of Rs. 1,500/-, as the case may be, by Registered Post/Speed Post at the sole/first applicant's sole risk and give credit to the Beneficiary Account with the Depository Participants, within 15 days from the Issue Closing Date for the Fixed Price Portion. Refund orders up to Rs.1,500/- will be sent under certificate of posting.
In accordance with the Act, the Stock Exchange requirements and SEBI Guidelines, the Company further undertake that:
The Company would make available adequate funds to the Registrars to the Issue for this purpose.
Refunds will be made by cheques/drafts/pay orders or demand drafts drawn on a bank appointed by the Company as a refund banker and bank charges, if any, for encashing such cheques or pay orders at other centres will be payable by the applicants. Such cheque or pay order or demand draft will however be payable at par at places where the applications are received.
No receipt will be issued for Application Money. However, the Bankers to the Issue receiving the Application Forms and Syndicate Members receiving the Bid Form will acknowledge receipt by stamping and returning the acknowledgement slip at the bottom of each Form.
DISPOSAL OF APPLICATIONS MADE BY STOCKINVEST
The procedure for applications made by cash or cheque or bank drafts will apply mutatis-mutandis to applications accompanied by Stockinvest except the following:
INTEREST ON REFUND OF EXCESS APPLICATION MONEY
Payment of interest @ 15% per annum on excess application money by the Company if refund orders are not dispatched within 15 days from the Offer Closing Date for Fixed Price Portion or within 15 days from Bid Closure Date in case of Book Built Portion as per the Guidelines issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance vide their letter No. F-8/6/SE/79 dated July 21, 1983, as amended vide their letter No. F/14/SE/85 dated September 27, 1985 addressed to the Stock Exchanges, and as further modified by SEBI's Clarification XXI dated October 27, 1997 on the guidelines for Disclosure and Investor Protection.
BASIS OF ALLOTMENT/ALLOCATION
Book Built Portion
Retail Investors
Non-Institutional Investors
Institutional Investors
Undersubscription in any category, would be allowed to be met with spill over from other categories
Fixed Price Portion
The basis of allotment would be made in the following manner:
METHOD OF PROPORTIONATE BASIS OF ALLOTMENT
In the event of oversubscription, the basis of allotment shall be finalized in consultation with The Bangalore Stock Exchange, Bangalore, which is the Regional Stock Exchange. Executive Director/Managing Director of the Regional Stock Exchange along with the BRLM and the Registrar to the Issue shall be responsible for ensuring that basis of allotment is finalized in a fair and proper manner.
REGISTERED OFFICE
Aztec Software and Technology Services Limited
#23, 3rd A Cross, 18th Main, Koramangala Block 6,
Bangalore 560 095
Tel. No.: (080) 5532036, 5522892, 5522893
Fax. No.: (080) 5521987
INVESTOR RELATIONS OFFICER
A.G. Muralikrishnan
Chief Financial Officer
Aztec Software and Technology Services Limited
#23, 3rd A Cross, 18th Main, Koramangala Block 6,
Bangalore 560 095
Tel. No.: (080) 5532036, 5522892, 5522893
Fax. No.: (080) 5521987
Email.: murali@aztecsoft.com
COMPANY SECRETARY AND COMPLIANCE OFFICER
A.S. Keshava Murthy
Aztec Software and Technology Services Limited
#23, 3rd A Cross, 18th Main, Koramangala Block 6,
Bangalore 560 095
Tel. No.: (080) 5532036, 5522892, 5522893
Fax. No.: (080) 5521987
Email.: keshavam@aztecsoft.com
ISSUE MANAGEMENT TEAM
BOOK RUNNING LEAD MANAGER
JM Morgan Stanley Limited
141, Maker Chambers III,
Nariman Point,
Mumbai 400 021.
Tel. No.: (022) 230 3030/ 283 1237
Fax. No.: (022) 204 2137/ 230 1694
Email:ankush.pitale@msdw.com
SYNDICATE MEMBERS
Enam Financial Consultants Private Limited
24, B D Rajabahadur Compound,
Ambalal Doshi Marg, Fort,
Mumbai 400 001
Tel. No.: (022) 265 0172
Fax. No.: (022) 265 3193
ADVISORS TO THE ISSUE
Bank of America
P.O. Box No 10080,
Express Towers, Nariman Point,
Mumbai 400 021
Tel. No.: (022) 285 2882
Fax. No.: (022) 285 5186
REGISTRARS TO THE ISSUE
MCS Limited
Sri Padmavati Bhavan, Plot No. 93, Road No. 16,
M.I.D.C. Andheri (East),
Mumbai 400 093
Tel. No.: (022) 820 5741/42
Fax. No.: (022) 820 1783
LEGAL ADVISOR TO THE issuer
Messers. N. Jayaraman
Advocates
#112/12, 11th Cross, Malleswaram,
Bangalore 560 003
Tel. No.: (080) 3363823
Fax. No.: (080) 3361196
Kanga & Co
Advocates, Solicitors and Notaries
Readymoney Mansion,
43 Veer Nariman Road,
Mumbai 400 001
Tel. No.: (022) 288 6541-52
Fax. No.: (022) 204 3726
LEGAL ADVISOR TO THE Book running lead managers
Amarchand & Mangaldas & Suresh A. Shroff & Co.
Solicitors & Advocates
Lentin Chambers
Dalal Street
Fort, Mumbai 400 023
Tel. No.: (022) 2650500
Fax No.: (022) 2633891
AUDITORS
BSR & Co.
Chartered Accountants
20/2 Vittal Mallya Road
Bangalore 560 001
Tel. No.: (080) 227 6000
Fax. No.: (080) 227 3000
BANKERS TO THE COMPANY
Union Bank of India
Industrial Finance Branch
111 Hafeeza Chambers, K.H. Road,
Bangalore 560 027
ESCROW COLLECTION BANKS
Citibank, N.A.
Plot C-61, Bandra Kurla Complex, G-Block,
Bandra (East),
Mumbai 400 051
Deutsche Bank AG
Mumbai Branch, Kodak House,
222, Dr. DN Road, Post Box 1142, Fort,
Mumbai 400 001
BANKERS TO THE ISSUE
Bank of America
P.O. Box No 10080,
Express Towers, Nariman Point,
Mumbai 400 021
Bank of Punjab Limited
7, Surya Mahal,
118, Nagindas Master Road, Fort,
Mumbai 400 023
Citibank, N.A.
Plot C-61, Bandra Kurla Complex, G-Block,
Bandra (East),
Mumbai 400 051
Deutsche Bank AG
Mumbai Branch, Kodak House,
222, Dr. DN Road, Post Box 1142, Fort,
Mumbai 400 001
BROKERS TO THE ISSUE
All members of the recognised Stock Exchanges would act as Brokers to the Issue for Fixed Price Portion.
B. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
AUDITORS' REPORT
|
BSR & Co. Chartered Accountants 20/2 Vittal Mallya Road, Bangalore 560 001 Tel. No.: (91-80) 227 6000 Fax. No.: (91-80) 227 3000 |
To
The Board of Directors
Aztec Software & Technology Services Limited
(formerly Aztec Software & Technology Services Private Limited)
Bangalore
As required by Part II of Schedule II of the Companies Act, 1956 and Securities and Exchange Board of India (Disclosure and Investor Protection) Guidelines, 2000 issued by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) in pursuance of sub-section (1) of Section 11 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, we have examined the financial information contained in and annexed to this report which is proposed to be included in the Prospectus of Aztec Software & Technology Services Limited (formerly Aztec Software & Technology Services Private Limited) (the Company) in connection with the public issue as approved by you, and we report that:
Financial Information as per audited financial statements
Other financial information
In our view, the "financial information as per the audited financial statements" and other "financial information" mentioned above is in accordance with the relevant requirements of Part II of Schedule II of the Companies Act, 1956 and Securities and Exchange Board of India (Disclosure and Investor Protection) Guidelines, 2000 issued by SEBI.
For BSR & Co.
Chartered Accountants
Sd/-
Balaji Swaminathan
Partner
Date: July 17, 2000
Place: Bangalore
AZTEC SOFTWARE & TECHNOLOGY SERVICES LIMITED
(formerly Aztec Software & Technology Services Private Limited)
ANNEXURE I (Part A)
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
(Rs. in million)
|
As at 31 March |
As at 30 June 2000 |
||||
|
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Fixed assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Block |
0.01 |
10.20 |
12.39 |
12.81 |
47.18 |
55.90 |
Less : Accumulated Depreciation |
0.00 |
2.80 |
6.01 |
9.20 |
18.72 |
22.05 |
Net Block |
0.01 |
7.40 |
6.38 |
3.61 |
28.46 |
33.85 |
Capital Work in progress |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1.46 |
5.36 |
|
0.01 |
7.40 |
6.38 |
3.61 |
29.92 |
39.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Investments |
- |
- |
1.37 |
1.96 |
34.60 |
74.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Current Assets, Loans and Advances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
- |
0.60 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Sundry Debtors |
0.50 |
2.27 |
2.81 |
2.34 |
42.63 |
79.41 |
Cash and Bank Balances |
0.03 |
1.87 |
1.49 |
28.54 |
15.83 |
28.21 |
Loans and Advances |
0.02 |
0.87 |
1.83 |
4.37 |
12.67 |
30.28 |
|
0.55 |
5.61 |
6.13 |
35.25 |
71.13 |
137.90 |
D. Liabilities and Provisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured Loans |
- |
3.22 |
3.24 |
- |
16.79 |
36.77 |
Unsecured Loans |
0.46 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Current Liabilities |
0.05 |
1.58 |
1.70 |
0.94 |
14.85 |
51.95 |
Provisions |
- |
0.02 |
0.63 |
0.28 |
1.46 |
1.48 |
|
0.51 |
4.82 |
5.57 |
1.22 |
33.10 |
90.20 |
E. Net worth |
0.05 |
8.19 |
8.31 |
39.60 |
102.55 |
161.28 |
F. Represented by: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Share Capital |
0.01 |
10.59 |
11.62 |
25.71 |
32.81 |
92.84 |
2. Reserves & Surplus |
0.05 |
(2.40) |
1.04 |
27.18 |
69.52 |
68.44 |
|
0.06 |
8.19 |
12.66 |
52.89 |
102.33 |
161.28 |
Less : Debit balance in Profit and Loss Account |
- |
- |
- |
(13.29) |
- |
- |
Less : Miscellaneous expenses not written off or adjusted |
(0.01) |
- |
(4.35) |
- |
- |
- |
3. Share application money pending allotment |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.22 |
- |
Net worth |
0.05 |
8.19 |
8.31 |
39.60 |
102.55 |
161.28 |
AZTEC SOFTWARE & TECHNOLOGY SERVICES LIMITED
(Formerly Aztec Software & Technology Services Private Limited)
ANNEXURE I (Part B)
Statement of Profits and Losses
(Rs. in million)
|
Year ended 31 March |
Quarter ended 30 June 2000 |
||||
|
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software development & services |
0.50 |
5.64 |
19.12 |
13.85 |
136.91 |
138.35 |
Other income |
- |
0.02 |
0.01 |
0.62 |
0.86 |
0.00 |
Total |
0.50 |
5.66 |
19.13 |
14.47 |
137.77 |
138.35 |
Expenditure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Staff costs |
0.04 |
2.26 |
6.68 |
8.95 |
35.66 |
21.24 |
Administration expenses |
0.39 |
3.40 |
8.06 |
12.01 |
48.88 |
66.98 |
Finance charges |
0.02 |
0.22 |
0.64 |
0.26 |
1.44 |
1.46 |
(Increase) / decrease in contracts-in-progress |
- |
(0.60) |
0.60 |
- |
- |
- |
Depreciation |
0.00 |
0.23 |
6.02 |
3.23 |
10.40 |
3.33 |
Total |
0.45 |
5.51 |
22.00 |
24.45 |
96.38 |
93.01 |
Profit from Operations |
0.05 |
0.15 |
(2.87) |
(9.98) |
41.39 |
45.34 |
Preliminary expenses written off |
- |
(0.01) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Product development expenses deferred |
- |
- |
4.35 |
1.44 |
- |
- |
Product development expenses written off |
- |
- |
- |
(5.79) |
- |
- |
Profit / (Loss) before tax |
0.05 |
0.14 |
1.48 |
(14.33) |
41.39 |
45.34 |
Provision for taxation |
- |
0.02 |
- |
- |
0.35 |
0.00 |
Profit / (Loss) after taxation |
0.05 |
0.12 |
1.48 |
(14.33) |
41.04 |
45.34 |
Adjustment for Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) – Note 1 |
- |
(2.57) |
2.57 |
- |
- |
- |
Adjustment for additional depreciation on account of revision in estimated useful life – Note 2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(0.09) |
- |
Profits after adjustments |
0.05 |
(2.45) |
4.05 |
(14.33) |
40.95 |
45.34 |
Notes:
In accordance with the (Disclosure and Investor Protection) Guidelines, 2000, the following adjustments have been made to the Statement of Assets and Liabilities and the Statement of Profits and Losses:
1. Intellectual Property Rights
In the financial year 1996-97, the value of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) capitalized amounting to Rs. 7,700,000 was not depreciated based on an expert opinion. However in the financial year 1997-98, the accounting policy has been changed and the IPR were amortised in three equal instalments commencing from the financial year 1996-97.
2. Additional Depreciation
In the financial year ended 31 March 2000, the Company revised the estimated useful life of its assets and accordingly recomputed the depreciation based on the new rates with retrospective effect rather than with prospective effect. The depreciation of Rs. 0.09 million undercharged to the profit and loss account has therefore been adjusted as a charge to the profit for the year ended 31 March 2000.
|
(Rs in millions) |
Nature of Income |
Interest received on deposits |
0.55 |
Recurring |
Miscellaneous receipts |
0.07 |
Recurring |
Total |
0.62 |
|
AZTEC SOFTWARE & TECHNOLOGY SERVICES LIMITED
(formerly Aztec Software & Technology Services Private Limited)
ANNEXURE II
Significant Accounting Policies and Notes to Statement of Assets and Liabilities
A. Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of preparation of financial statements
The financial statements have been prepared under the historical-cost convention in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, on the accrual basis of accounting and comply with the mandatory accounting standards and statements issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.
Revenue recognition
Revenue from software development on a time-and-material basis is recognized based on software developed, and billed to clients as per the terms of specific contracts. For fixed price contracts, revenue is recognized based on the milestones achieved, as specified in the contracts, on a percentage of completion basis. Revenue from the sale of software products developed is recognized when the sale has been completed with the passing of title. Interest on deployment of surplus funds is recognized using the time-proportion method, based on interest rates implicit in the transaction. Revenue from the sale of Special Import Licences is recognized when the licences are actually sold.
Expenditure
Expenses are accounted on accrual basis and provision is made for all known losses and liabilities.
Fixed assets
Fixed assets are stated at the cost of acquisition less accumulated depreciation. Relevant incidental costs are capitalized till the assets are ready to be put to use.
Depreciation
Depreciation on all fixed assets is provided using the straight-line method based on useful lives as estimated by the Management. Individual assets costing less than Rs. 5,000/- are depreciated in full in the year of purchase. In respect of additions/deletions of fixed assets, depreciation is being charged on a pro-rata basis from/till the date of such addition/deletion. The Management’s estimate of useful lives of the various fixed assets are given below:
Computers and Accessories |
3 years |
Software and Intellectual Property |
1 to 3 years |
Furniture and Fixtures |
5 years |
Other Equipment |
5 years |
Improvements to Leasehold Premises |
5 years |
Electrical Installation |
5 years |
Generator |
5 years |
Contracts in progress
The Company incurs cost on software development contracts. Unbilled costs on contracts are accumulated and carried forward as contracts-in-progress until they are matched against revenues recognised.
Foreign currency transactions
In the case of sales made to clients outside India, income is accounted on the basis of the exchange rate as on the date of the transaction. Expenditure in foreign currency is accounted for at the conversion rates prevalent when such expenditure is incurred. Where disbursements are made out of a foreign currency bank account, all transactions during the month are reported at a rate, which approximates the actual monthly rate.
The Company recognises all transaction/translation gains and losses in the profit and loss account except those relating to liabilities incurred for the acquisition of fixed assets, which are adjusted to the cost of the respective assets.
Current assets and current liabilities denominated in foreign currency are translated at the exchange rate prevalent at the date of the balance sheet. All exchange gains/losses are accounted for in the profit and loss account.
Investments
Long-term investments are carried at cost, and provision is made to recognise permanent decline, if any, in the value of such investments. The investment in the subsidiary is carried at the original rupee cost.
Retirement Benefits
All employees receive benefits from a provident fund, which is a defined contribution plan. Both the employee and employer make monthly contributions to the plan equal to 12% of the eligible employees’ salary, which are remitted to the Government’s provident fund. The Company has no further obligations under this plan beyond its monthly contributions. A provision for gratuity is made on the basis of actuarial valuation.
Taxation
Provision for taxation is made in accordance with the Income-tax laws prevailing at the time of the relevant assessment years.
B. Notes to Statement of Assets and Liabilities
1 Pursuant to Section 44 of the Companies Act, 1956 the Company has effective June 12, 2000 changed its name to Aztec Software & Technology Services Limited.
2 Employee Stock Option Plan
The Company has instituted a Stock Options Plan during the year 1998 for its employees, directors, consultants and independent advisors of the Company and its subsidiary corporations (1998 Stock Options Plan ) (1998 SOP) in pursuance of the special resolution approved by the shareholders in the Shareholders’ Meeting held on November 7, 1998. Under the plan, grants for subscription to the Company’s equity shares (‘Options’) were extended to the eligible employees and others as per the terms and conditions laid down in the plan. Up to March 31, 2000, a total of 5,160,000 equity shares of Rs. 3 each had been allocated for the plan.
Vide approval from the shareholders in the Annual General Meeting held on 30 May 2000, the 1998 SOP was classified into two separate plans, the 1998 Stock Option Plan (India) (SOP India) and the 1998 Stock Option Plan (U.S.) (SOP U.S.). Out of 1998 SOP, 666,666 equity shares of Rs. 3 each were allocated to the SOP U.S. and the balance of 4,493,334 equity shares were transferred to SOP India. In the same meeting, the SOP U.S. was augmented by additional 666,666 equity shares of Rs. 3 each taking the total number of shares allocated to 1,333,332 equity shares of Rs. 3 each.
In accordance with the 1998 SOP, the Company has during the year set up Aztec Software and Technology Services Private Limited – Employees’ Welfare Trust, a trust formed for the administration and implementation of the 1998 SOP. The Company has during the year allotted 4,493,334 equity shares of Rs. 3 each to the trust.
1998 Stock Option Plan (India)
Each option granted under the plan (SOP India) entitles the holder thereof to an option to apply for and be issued one equity share of Rs. 3 each at an exercise price to be determined by the Committee set up under the plan. The equity shares under this plan normally vests over a period of fifty months from the date of the grant. As on 30 June 2000, the Company has offered a total of 3,821,734 equity shares of Rs. 3 each at par under this plan and as on this date right to subscribe for 1,267,524 equity shares had vested with the stock option holders. As at 30 June 2000, none of the stock option holders have exercised their right to acquire equity shares that have vested.
1998 Stock Option Plan (U.S.)
Each option granted under the plan (SOP U.S.) entitles the holder thereof to an option to apply for and be issued one equity share of Rs. 3 each at an exercise price to be determined by the Committee set up under the plan. The equity shares under this plan normally vests over a period of fifty months from the date of the grant. As on 30 June 2000, the Company has offered a total of 393,000 equity shares of Rs. 3 each at par under this plan and as on this date no equity share has been vested with the stock option holders.
3 Contingent Liabilities / Commitments
4 Foreign Exchange fluctuations
Income from software development services for the quarter ended 30 June 2000 includes net realised and unrealised exchange gains of Rs. 1,480,463 and administrative and other expenses for the quarter ended include net unrealized loss of Rs. 115,265.
ANNEXURE III Part A
STATEMENT OF ACCOUNTS OF AZTEC SOFTWARE, INC
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
in USD
|
As at 31 March |
As at |
||
|
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
30 June 2000 |
A. Fixed Assets |
|
|
|
|
Gross Block |
5,299 |
5,299 |
174,308 |
301,487 |
Less : Depreciation |
265 |
2,279 |
14,538 |
32,730 |
Net Block |
5,034 |
3,020 |
159,770 |
268,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
B. Current Assets, Loans and Advances |
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
- |
- |
64,500 |
- |
Sundry Debtors |
- |
- |
267,436 |
922,300 |
Cash and Bank Balances |
1,024 |
21,918 |
6,863 |
123,441 |
Loans and Advances |
- |
1,262 |
75,221 |
190,411 |
|
1,024 |
23,180 |
414,020 |
1,236,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
C. Liabilities and Provisions |
15,202 |
91,515 |
80,531 |
164,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
D. Net worth |
(9,144) |
(65,315) |
493,259 |
1,340,788 |
E. Represented by : |
|
|
|
|
1. Share Capital |
- |
50,000 |
800,000 |
1,700,000 |
2. Reserves |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Less: Debit balance in Profit and Loss Account |
(23,986) |
(99,636) |
(295,541) |
(349,132) |
Less: Miscellaneous expenses not written off or adjusted |
(26,158) |
(15,679) |
(11,200) |
(10,080) |
3.Share application money pending allotment |
41,000 |
- |
- |
- |
Net worth |
(9,144) |
(65,315) |
493,259 |
1,340,788 |
Extent of interest so far as it concerns the Members of Aztec Software & Technology Services Limited, the holding company in the capital of the subsidiary. |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
Net worth so far as it concerns the Members of Aztec Software & Technology Services Limited, the holding company in the capital of the subsidiary. |
(9,144) |
(65,315) |
493,259 |
1,340,788 |
ANNEXURE III Part B
STATEMENT OF ACCOUNTS OF AZTEC SOFTWARE, INC
Statement of Profits and Losses
in USD
|
Period ended 31 March |
Years ended 31 March |
Quarter ended 30 June |
|
|
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2000 |
Income |
|
|
|
|
Product licensing fees |
- |
75,000 |
288,800 |
129,000 |
Consulting services |
- |
25,000 |
- |
530,040 |
Other income |
- |
- |
10,391 |
382,993 |
Total |
- |
100,000 |
299,191 |
1,042,033 |
Expenditure |
|
|
|
|
Staff costs |
- |
81,532 |
246,720 |
531,313 |
Other administrative costs |
23,144 |
92,001 |
293,467 |
480,895 |
Finance charges |
577 |
103 |
7,150 |
724 |
Software work-in-progress |
- |
- |
(64,500) |
64,500 |
Total |
23,721 |
173,636 |
482,837 |
1,077,432 |
Operating profit |
(23,721) |
(73,636) |
(183,646) |
(35,399) |
Depreciation |
265 |
2,014 |
12,259 |
18,192 |
Profit / (Loss) |
(23,986) |
(75,650) |
(195,905) |
(53,591) |
Extent of interest so far as it concerns the members of Aztec Software & Technology Services Limited, the holding company. |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
Profit/ (Loss) so far as it concerns the members of Aztec Software & Technology Services Limited, the holding company. |
(23,986) |
(75,650) |
(195,905) |
(53,591) |
AZTEC SOFTWARE & TECHNOLOGY SERVICES LIMITED
(formerly Aztec Software & Technology Services Private Limited)
ANNEXURE IV
DETAILS OF DIVIDEND
Details regarding dividend paid in respect of each class of shares in the Company for each of the five financial years immediately preceding the issue of prospectus:
Class of Shares in respect of which dividend has been paid |
Rate |
Amount (Rs. million) |
Year |
Equity shares of Rs. 10/- each |
5% |
0.56 |
31 March 1998 |
|
Pro-rata |
|
|
Class of Shares in respect of which dividend has not been paid |
Year |
|
|
Equity shares of Rs. 10/- each |
31 March 1996 |
Equity shares of Rs. 10/- each |
31 March 1997 |
Equity shares of Rs. 10/- each |
31 March 1999 |
Equity shares of Rs. 3/- each |
31 March 2000 |
|
|
AZTEC SOFTWARE & TECHNOLOGY SERVICES LIMITED
(formerly Aztec Software & Technology Services Private Limited)
ANNEXURE V - Statement of Cash Flows
Rs in million
Years ended 31 March |
Quarter ended 30 June |
|||||
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2000 |
|
Cash flows from operations: |
||||||
Profit / (Loss) before tax as per Profit and Loss Account |
0.05 |
0.14 |
1.48 |
(14.33) |
41.39 |
45.34 |
Adjustment for change in accounting policy in respect of amortization of intellectual property rights |
- |
(2.57) |
2.57 |
- |
- |
- |
Adjustment for revision of estimated useful economic lives of fixed assets |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(0.09) |
- |
Profit / (Loss) before tax after adjustments |
0.05 |
(2.43) |
4.05 |
(14.33) |
41.30 |
45.34 |
Interest on fixed deposits and miscellaneous income |
- |
(0.02) |
(0.01) |
(0.62) |
(0.86) |
(0.00) |
(Profit) / Loss on sale of fixed assets |
- |
- |
- |
0.12 |
0.04 |
- |
Interest on term borrowings |
- |
0.18 |
0.56 |
0.21 |
0.81 |
0.97 |
Depreciation & amortizations adjusted for the impact of change in accounting policy and revision of estimate in useful economic lives of fixed assets |
0.00 |
2.81 |
3.45 |
6.90 |
10.49 |
3.33 |
Product development expenditure during the year / period |
- |
- |
(4.35) |
(1.44) |
- |
- |
Income from transfer of proprietary rights of software products developed to subsidiary |
- |
- |
- |
2.12 |
- |
- |
Preliminary expenditure during the year / period |
(0.01) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(Increase) / decrease in sundry debtors |
(0.50) |
(1.77) |
(0.54) |
0.47 |
(40.29) |
(36.78) |
(Increase) / decrease in contracts in progress |
- |
(0.60) |
0.60 |
- |
- |
- |
(Increase) / decrease in loans and advances |
(0.02) |
(0.84) |
(0.96) |
(2.44) |
(7.96) |
(4.22) |
Increase / (decrease) in current liabilities |
0.51 |
1.07 |
0.12 |
(0.76) |
13.91 |
37.10 |
Increase / (decrease) in provisions |
- |
- |
- |
0.28 |
0.83 |
0.02 |
Net cash from (used in) operations |
0.03 |
(1.60) |
2.92 |
(9.49) |
18.27 |
45.76 |
Income taxes paid net of refunds received |
- |
(0.01) |
(0.00) |
(0.12) |
(0.34) |
- |
Cash flows from financing : |
||||||
Share application money received: |
||||||
From promoters |
0.01 |
9.01 |
1.03 |
41.27 |
21.78 |
- |
From others |
- |
1.57 |
- |
- |
0.22 |
13.39 |
Loan to Aztec Software & Technology Services Private Limited Employees Welfare Trust |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(13.39) |
Interest on fixed deposits and miscellaneous income |
- |
0.02 |
0.01 |
0.62 |
0.86 |
0.00 |
Interest charges on term borrowings |
- |
(0.18) |
(0.56) |
(0.21) |
(0.81) |
(0.97) |
Term loans availed from banks |
- |
1.54 |
0.29 |
- |
4.86 |
29.00 |
Term loans from banks repaid |
- |
- |
- |
(1.83) |
- |
(4.86) |
Balances due to hire vendors under financing arrangements |
- |
0.28 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Balances due to hire vendors paid |
- |
- |
(0.10) |
(0.18) |
- |
- |
Packing credit loan availed from (repaid to) banks - net |
- |
1.40 |
(0.17) |
(1.23) |
11.93 |
(4.16) |
Dividends paid including dividend tax |
- |
- |
- |
(0.61) |
- |
- |
Net cash from financing |
0.01 |
13.64 |
0.50 |
37.83 |
38.84 |
19.01 |
Cash flows from investing: |
||||||
Income from investments |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Proceeds from sale of investments |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets |
- |
- |
- |
0.09 |
0.09 |
- |
Purchase of fixed assets |
(0.01) |
(10.19) |
(2.43) |
(0.67) |
(36.93) |
(12.62) |
Investment in subsidiary |
- |
- |
(1.37) |
(0.59) |
(32.64) |
(39.77) |
Net cash from (used in) investing |
(0.01) |
(10.19) |
(3.80) |
(1.17) |
(69.48) |
(52.39) |
Total increase / (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents during the year |
0.03 |
1.84 |
(0.38) |
27.05 |
(12.71) |
12.38 |
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year |
- |
0.03 |
1.87 |
1.49 |
28.54 |
15.83 |
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year |
0.03 |
1.87 |
1.49 |
28.54 |
15.83 |
28.21 |
PARTICULARS OF LOANS AND ASSETS CHARGED AS SECURITY
S. No. |
Name of Financial Institutions |
Nature of Loan |
Loan Sanctioned (Rs. million) |
Loan outstanding as on March 31, 2000 (Rs. million) |
Rate of Interest schedule |
Repayment |
Security Offered |
||
1 |
Exim Bank |
Term Loan |
29.0 |
Nil |
14.0% p.a. payable quarterly |
8 equal half yearly instalments commencing from December 20, 2000 |
First exclusive charge on whole of Aztec’s movable fixed assets, both present and future, including movable plant and machinery, equipment, appliances, furniture, vehicles, machinery spares and stores, tools and accessories, whether or not installed. |
||
Working Capital |
|||||||||
1 |
Union Bank of India |
Packing Credit Fund based |
15.0 |
11.93 |
10% |
- |
Software meant for export as per confirmed sale contracts |
C. STATUTORY AND OTHER INFORMATION
MINIMUM SUBSCRIPTION:
The minimum subscription to be raised by this Issue is [· ] Equity Shares being 90% of the [· ] Equity Shares offered through the Offer Document to be filed with RoC.
If the Company does not receive the minimum subscription of 90% of the Issue amount including devolvement of Syndicate Members, if any, within 60 days from the Issue Closing Date for Fixed Price Portion, the Company shall forthwith refund the entire subscription amount received. For delay beyond 78 days from the Issue Closing Date for Fixed Price Portion, if any, in refund of such subscription, the Company shall pay interest as per Section 73 of the Companies Act, 1956. For delay beyond 78 days from the Issue Closing Date for Fixed Price Portion, in refund of amount collected, the Company and its Directors shall be jointly and severally liable to repay the amount with interest at the rate of 15% p.a.
EXPENSES OF THE ISSUE
The expenses of the Issue payable by Aztec inclusive of brokerage, fees payable to the Book Running Lead Manager, Syndicate Members, fees of Legal Advisors, stamp duty, printing, publication, advertising and distribution expenses, bank charges, fees payable to the Registrars to the Issue, listing fees and other miscellaneous expenses will not exceed Rs. 35 million, and will be met out of the proceeds of the present issue.
FEES PAYABLE TO THE BOOK RUNNING LEAD MANAGER
The total fees payable to the Book Running Lead Manager will be as per the Memorandum of Understanding signed with the Book Running Lead Manager, copies of which are available for inspection at the Registered Office of the Company.
FEES PAYABLE TO THE ADVISORS TO THE ISSUE
The total fees payable to the Advisors to the Issue will be as per the Appointment Letter issued to them, copies of which are available for inspection at the Registered Office of the Company.
FEES PAYABLE TO THE REGISTRARS TO THE ISSUE
The fees payable to the Registrars to the Issue MCS Limited are set out in the relevant documents kept open for inspection at the Registered Office of Aztec.
The Registrars will be reimbursed with all relevant out-of-pocket expenses such as cost of stationery, postage, stamp duty, communication expenses, etc. Adequate funds will be provided to the Registrars to the Issue to enable them to send refund orders/ letter(s) of allotment/share certificate(s) by registered post.
UNDERWRITING COMMISSION, BROKERAGE AND SELLING COMMISSION
The underwriting commission and selling commission for the Book Built Portion is as set out in the Syndicate Agreement entered between the Company, the BRLM and Syndicate Members.
Underwriting commission for the Fixed Price Portion shall be paid as set out in the Syndicate Agreement on the offer price of the Equity Shares issued through Draft Offer Document to the Public for subscription and underwritten in the manner mentioned elsewhere in the Draft Offer Document.
Brokerage for the Fixed Price Portion @ of ___% of the Offer Price of the Equity Shares would be paid by the Company on the basis of the allotments made against the applications bearing the stamp of a member of any recognised Stock Exchange in India in the ‘Broker’ column. Brokerage at the same rate will also be payable to the Bankers to the Issue in respect of the allotments made against applications procured by them provided the respective forms of application bear their respective stamp in the Broker column. In case of tampering or over-stamping of Brokers’/ Agents’ codes on the application form, the Issuer’s decision to pay brokerage in this respect will be final and no further correspondence will be entertained in this matter.
PREVIOUS RIGHTS AND PUBLIC ISSUES
The Company has not made any Public or rights Issue since its inception.
ISSUES OTHERWISE THAN FOR CASH
Save as stated elsewhere in the Draft Offer Document under heading "Capital Structure", the Company has not issued any Equity Shares for consideration otherwise than for cash.
PREVIOUS DEBENTURE/BOND ISSUES
There are no outstanding Debentures or Bonds.
PREVIOUS ISSUE OF PREFERENCE SHARES
The Company has not issued any Preference Shares till date.
COMMISSION AND BROKERAGE ON PREVIOUS ISSUES
No sum has been paid or is payable as commission or brokerage for subscribing to or procuring or agreeing to procure subscription for any of the shares of the Company since its inception.
CAPITALISATION OF RESERVES OR PROFITS
The Company through a resolution of the Board passed on June 12, 2000 pursuant to the Resolution passed by the Members of the Company at their Extraordinary General Meeting held on May 30, 2000 has capitalized a sum of Rs. 46,419,180 out of its General Reserves and Share Premium Account, which has been applied for the issue and allotment of 15,473,060 fully paid Bonus Shares of Rs. 3/- each to the holders of the then existing Equity Shares of the Company in the ratio of one Equity Share for every Equity Share held.
Save for these capitalisations, the Company has not capitalized its reserves or profits at any time.
OPTION TO SUBSCRIBE
Save as stated otherwise in the Draft Offer Document, the Company has not given any option to subscribe for any Shares of the Company.
The Retail Bidders in the Book Built Portion and applicants in the Fixed Price Portion have an option either to receive the Share Certificate(s) or to hold securities with Depository. For details refer to paragraph on Option to hold Shares in Electronic Form with NSDL/CDSL on page _________.
PURCHASE OF PROPERTY
There is no property which the Company has purchased or acquired or proposes to purchase or acquire which is to be paid for wholly or partly out of the proceeds of the present Issue or the purchase or acquisition of which has not been completed on the date of issue of this Draft Offer Document, other than property:
(a) the contracts for the purchase or acquisition whereof were entered into in the ordinary course of the Company’s business, the contracts not being made in contemplation of the issue nor the issue in consequence of the contract; or
(b) in respect of which the amount of the purchase money is not material.
REMUNERATION OF MANAGING DIRECTOR / WHOLETIME DIRECTORS / MANAGER
Remuneration of Mr. B.G. Balakrishna – President and Chief Executive Officer – Indian Operations
The Board at its meeting held on May 3, 2000, has appointed Mr. B.G. Balakrishna, President and Chief Executive Officer – Indian Operations, as Manager within the meaning of Section 269 of the Act for a period of two years beginning from May 3, 2000. The Company entered into an Agreement with Mr. Balakrishna on May 3, 2000, which inter-alia provides for
Remuneration of Mr. S. Parthasarthy, Managing Director
The Board at its meeting held on December 21, 1998 had appointed Mr. S. Parthasarthy as the Managing Director of the Company for a period of five years with effect from January 1, 1999. Mr. Parthasarthy resigned as the Managing Director with effect from April 1, 2000 because of his intention to relocate to the US to head the operations of the subsidiary of the Company. Mr. Parthasarthy however continues to be the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company.
The Company paid a remuneration of Rs. 0.97 million during the year 1998-99 and Rs. 1.25 million during the year 1999-2000 to Mr. Parthasarthy for the services rendered by him in his capacity as the Managing Director.
INTEREST OF PROMOTERS AND DIRECTORS
All the Directors are interested to the extent of fees, if any, payable to them for attending meetings of the Board or Committee thereof as well as to the extent of other remuneration, disbursement of expenses payable to them under the Articles of Association. The Directors are also interested to the extent of shares, if any, already held by them in Aztec or that may be subscribed by and allotted to them out of the present issue.
The Directors may also be regarded as interested in the shares that may be held by or that may be subscribed by and allotted to them by the companies in which they are interested as Directors and/or members.
All Directors may be deemed to be interested in the contracts, agreements/arrangements entered into or to be entered into by Aztec with any company in which they hold Directorships.
No Director of Aztec is interested in the appointment of any of the Managers, underwriters, Registrars and Bankers to the Issue. No Director of Aztec is interested in any property acquired by Aztec within two years of the date of the Draft Offer Document or proposed to be acquired by it.
In 1996-97, the Company purchased certain Intellectual Property Rights for a consideration of Rs. 7.7 million from Mr. S. Parthasarthy, a Promoter and a Director of the Company. Mr. Parthasarathy is also entitled to a remuneration of USD 150,000 in his capacity as an employee of Aztec Software Inc., a subsidiary of the Company. In 1998-99, the Company paid Rs. 0.25 million and in 1999-2000 Rs. 0.33 million to Mr. M. Chandrasekaran, a Director of the Company towards consultancy fees.
REVALUATION OF ASSETS
The Company has not revalued any of its assets since its inception.
CLASSES OF SHARES
The Authorized Capital of the Company is Rs. 127.5 million, which is divided into 42.5 million Equity Shares of Rs. 3/- each.
The Shareholders of the Company at their Extra-ordinary General Meeting held on May 11, 2000 have passed a resolution for increasing the Authorized Capital of the Company to Rs. 127.5 million, which is divided into 42,500,000 Equity Shares of Rs. 3/- each.
PAYMENT OR BENEFIT TO PROMOTERS OR OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY
Save as otherwise stated in this Draft Offer Document, no amount or benefit has been paid or given within the two preceding years or is intended to be paid or given within the two preceding years to any Promoters or Officers of the Company except the normal remuneration for services rendered as Directors, officers or employees of the Company.
MAIN PROVISIONS OF THE ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION OF THE COMPANY
TABLE 'A' TO APPLY
Article 1 provides
The Regulations contained in Table 'A' in the First Schedule to the Companies Act, 1956 referred to hereinafter as thereto so far as the same are applicable to a Public Company as defined in the Act, shall apply to this Company in the same manner as if all such Regulations of Table 'A' are specifically contained in these Articles, subject to the modifications herein contained.
DIRECTORS
Article 27 provides
The Directors of the Company are the following as on adoption of these Articles of Association:
(a) Mr. S. Parthasarathy
(b) Mr. K.B. Chandrasekhar
(c) Mr. M. Chandrasekaran
(d) Mr. Sunil Gulati
(e) Mr. Somshankar Das
Article 25 provides
Article 30 provides
Article 34 provides
The Directors of the Company for the time being shall subject to provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Rules framed thereunder be paid a sitting fee of such sum as may be determined by the Board from time to time for every meeting of the Board or of any Committee of the Board attended by them in addition to all traveling and halting expenses incurred by them in attending and returning from such meetings of the Board or of any committee of the Board.
SHARE QUALIFICATION
Article 28 provides
No share qualification is necessary for any individual for being appointed as director of the Company.
DIRECTORS AND THEIR CONTRACTS WITH THE COMPANY
Article 37 provides
Subject to the provisions of the Act, the Directors shall not be disqualified by reason of their office as such Director from Contracting with the Company either as a vendor, purchaser, lender, agent, broker or otherwise, nor shall any such contract or arrangement entered into by or on behalf of the Company with any Director or with the Company or partnership firm in which any Director shall be a Director, Member, Partner or otherwise interested be avoided, nor shall any Director so contracting or being so interested in any contract or arrangement be liable to account to the Company for any profits realized on such contract or arrangement by reason only of such Director holding the office of fiduciary relation thereby established but the nature of the interest must be disclosed by him at the Meeting of the Board of Directors at which the contract or arrangement is determined if the interest then exists, or in any other case at the first meeting of the Board after the acquisition of the interest, provided nevertheless that no director shall vote as a Director in respect of any contract, or arrangement in which he is so interested as aforesaid and if he does, his vote shall not be counted but he shall be entitled to be present at the meeting during the transactions of the business in relation to which he is excluded from voting although he shall not be counted for the purposes of ascertaining whether there is the required quorum of Directors present. A general notice that any Director is a Director or a Member of any specified firm and is to be regarded as interested in any subsequent transaction will be sufficient disclosure under this Article and after such General notice it shall not be necessary to give special notice relating to any particular transaction with such company or firm.
Article 38 provides
Nothing in Article 37 shall apply to any contract/arrangement entered into between this company and other company where any of the Directors of this company or two or more of them together hold not more than 2 percent of the paid up share capital of the Company.
POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE MANAGING DIRECTOR
Article 46 provides
Subject to the provisions of the Act, the Directors may from time to time entrust upon the Managing Director/ Manager for the time being such of the powers exercisable under these presents by the Board of Directors as they may think fit upon such terms and conditions and with such restrictions as they may think expedient and they may confer such powers either collaterally with such restrictions or to the exclusion of and in substitution for all or any of the powers of the Board of Directors in that behalf and may from time to time revoke, withdraw, alter or vary all or any such powers. The Managing Director/Joint Managing Director/ Manager may exercise all the powers entrusted to them by the Board of Directors jointly or severally in any manner as they may deem fit.
Provided that the Managing Director/ Joint Managing Director/ Manager shall periodically report to the Board in respect of all actions taken by it under this Article at periodical intervals.
BORROWING POWERS OF THE BOARD
Article 23 provides
The Board may from time to time at its discretion borrow and secure the repayment of any sum of money for the purposes of the Company, provided that the Board shall not, except with the consent of the Company in general meeting, borrow moneys where the moneys to be borrowed by the company (apart from temporary loans from the Company's bankers in the ordinary course of business) will exceed the aggregate of the paid-up capital of the Company and its free reserves, that is to say, reserves not set apart for any specific purpose of the Company.
Article 24 provides
Subject to the provisions of Article 23 above, the board may raise or secure the repayment of such sum or sums in such manner and upon such terms and conditions in all respects as it thinks fit by the issue of bonds perpetual or redeemable, debentures or debenture stock or mortgage or charge or other security on the whole of the undertaking or any part thereof on any property of the Company (both present and future) including its uncalled capital for the time being. Any bonds, debentures, debenture stock or other securities issued or to be issued by the Company shall be under the control of the board which may issue them on such terms and conditions and in such manner and for such consideration as it shall consider to be for the benefit of the company.
FURTHER ISSUE OF SHARES
Article 3 provides
3.1 Where at the time after the expiry of two years from the formation of the Company or at any time after the expiry of one year from the allotment of shares in the Company made for the first time after its formation, whichever is earlier, it is proposed to increase the subscribed capital of the Company by allotment of further shares either out of the unissued capital or out of the increased share capital then:
3.2 Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-clause (1) thereof, the further shares aforesaid may be offered to any persons (whether or not those persons include the members referred to in clause (a) of sub-clause (1) hereof in any manner whatsoever.
3.3 Nothing in sub-clause (c) of (1) hereof shall be deemed:
3.4 Nothing in this Article shall apply to the increase of the subscribed capital of the Company caused by the exercise of an option attached to the debenture issued or loans raised by the Company;
To convert such debentures or loans into shares in the Company.
To subscribe for shares in the Company (whether such option is conferred in these articles or otherwise)
Provided that the terms of issue of such debentures or the terms of such loans include a term providing for such option and such term:
ALLOTMENT OR DISPOSAL OF SHARES
Article 4 provides
Subject to the provisions of Section 81 of the Act and these Articles, the shares in the Capital of the Company for the time being shall be under the control of the Board of Directors, who may allot or otherwise dispose of the same to such persons on such terms and conditions whether at par or at a premium or (subject to the provisions of the Act) at a discount and at such time as they may, from time to time think fit and with the sanction of the Company in the General Meeting to give to any person or persons the option or right to call for any shares either at par or premium during such time and for such consideration as the Directors think fit, and any issue and allot shares in the capital of the Company on payment in full or part of any property sold and transferred or for any services rendered to the Company in the conduct of its business and any shares and if so issued, shall be deemed to be fully paid shares. Provided that option or right to call of shares shall not be given to any person or persons without the sanction of the Company in the General Meeting.
DEMATERIALISATION OF SHARES
Article 6 provides
DIVISION & SUB-DIVISION OF SHARES
Article 11 provides
The Company may by ordinary resolution:
ISSUE AND OFFER OF SHARES TO EMPLOYEES, DIRECTORS, ETC.
Article 12 provides
Subject to the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956, SEBI regulations in this regard and any other provisions in law in this regard, the Board is hereby authorized to issue shares or debentures (whether or not convertible into shares) for offer and allotment to such officers, employees and workers of the Company as the Board may select or the trustees of such trust as may be set up for the benefit of the officers, employees and workers in accordance with the terms and conditions of such scheme, plan or proposal as the Board may formulate. Subject to the consent of the stock exchanges and of SEBI, the Board may impose conditions that the shares in or debentures of the Company so allotted shall not be transferable for a specified time period.
TRANSFER AND TRANSMISSION OF SHARES
Article 14 provides
The instrument of transfer shall be in writing and all the Provisions of Section 108 of the Act, and of any statutory modification thereof shall be duly complied with in respect of all transfers of shares and the registration thereof.
NOMINATION
Article 15 provides
(ii) if the nominee elects to be registered as holder of the share(s), himself, he shall deliver or send to the Company, a notice in writing signed by him stating that he so elects and such notice shall be accompanied with the death certificate of the deceased shareholder;
(iii) a nominee shall be entitled to the same dividends and other advantages to which he would be entitled to, if he were registered holder of the share(s), except that he shall not, before being registered as a member in respect of his share(s) be entitled to meetings of the Company.
Provided that the Board may, at any time, give notice requiring any such person to elect either to be registered himself or transfer the share, and if the notice is not complied within ninety days, the Board may thereafter withhold payment of all dividends, bonuses or other moneys payable or rights accruing in respect of shares, until the requirements of the notice have complied with.
LIEN
Article 18 provides
The Company shall have a first and paramount lien upon all the shares (excluding fully paid up shares) registered in the name of each member (whether solely or jointly with others and upon the proceeds of sale thereof for all moneys whether presently payable or not) called or payable at a fixed time in respect of such shares. Such lien shall extend to all dividends and bonuses from time to time declared in respect of such shares. Unless otherwise agreed the registration of transfer of shares shall not operate as waiver of the Company's lien, if any, on such shares. The Board of Directors may at any time declare any shares to be wholly or partly to be exempted from the provisions of this clause.
SELLING AGENTS
Article 48 provides
Subject to the provisions of the Act, the Board may appoint any firm or body corporate as the sole selling agents of the company for such area and on such terms and conditions as the Board may deem fit from time to time.
SECRECY
Article 51 provides
No member shall be entitled to inspect the Company's books, works, establishment without the permission of the Board, nor require discovery of any matter which is or may in the nature of trade secret, mystery of trade or secret process, which may relate to the conduct of the business of the Company and which in the opinion of the Board will not be expedient in the interest of the members of the Company to communicate to public.
INDEMNITY
Article 54 provides
Subject to provisions of Section 201 of the Act every Director, Managing Director, Manager, Secretary or Officer of the Company or any person (whether an Officer of the Company or not) employed by the Company and any person appointed as Auditor shall be indemnified out of the funds of the Company against all liability (including all costs, losses and expenses) incurred by him as such Director, Managing Director, Manager, Secretary, Officer, employee or Auditor by reason of any contract entered into or act or deed done by him in the discharge of his duties or in defending any proceedings whether civil or criminal in which judgement is given in his favour or in which he is acquired or in connection with any application under Section 633 of the Act in which relief is granted to him by the Court. Nothing herein contained shall apply to the attorney of the Managing Director of the company, unless such Attorney is or is deemed to be an officer of the company, unless such Attorney is or is deemed to be an officer of the Company. Subject to the provisions of Section 201 of the Act, no Director or other officer of the Company shall be liable for any acts, receipts, neglects or defaults of any other Director or officer or for joining any receipt or other act of confirmity, or for any loss or expense happening to the Company through in-efficiency or deficiency of title of any property acquired by order of the Directors for or on behalf of the Company, or for the insufficiency of any security in or upon which any of the monies of the Companies shall be invested, or for any loss or damage arising from the bankruptcy, insolvency or tortuous act of any person, company or corporation with whom any moneys, securities or effect be entrusted or deposited for a loss occasioned by any error or judgement or oversight on his part or for any other loss or damage or misfortune whatever which shall happen in the execution of the duties of his office or in relation thereto, unless the same happens through his own willful misconduct or neglect or dishonesty.
D. MATERIAL CONTRACTS AND INSPECTION OF DOCUMENTS
The following contracts (not being contracts entered into in the ordinary course of business carried on by the Company or entered into more than two years before the date of this Draft Offer Document) which are or may be deemed material have been entered or to be entered into by the Company. These contracts, copies of which have been attached to the copy of this Draft Offer Document, delivered to the Registrar of Companies, Karnataka at Bangalore for registration and also the documents for inspection referred to hereunder, may be inspected at the Registered Office of the Company situated at #23, 3rd A Cross, 18th Main, Koramangala Block 6, Bangalore 560 095 India, from 10.00 a.m. to 3.00 p.m. from the date of this Draft Offer Document until the date of closure of the Subscription List.
A. MATERIAL CONTRACTS
B. MATERIAL DOCUMENTS
PART III
DECLARATION
We, the Directors of the Company, hereby declare that no statement made in this Draft Offer Document shall contravene any of the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the rules made thereunder. All the legal requirements connected with the said issue as also the guidelines, instructions etc. issued by SEBI, Government and any other competent authority in this behalf have been duly complied with.
SIGNED BY THE DIRECTORS
S. Parthasarathy
K.B. Chandrasekhar
M. Chandrashekharan
Sunil Gulati
Somshankar Das
Date:
Place: Bangalore